So I wonder how Trek will handle social media, for instance? The Internet was very new the last time Trek mentioned it.
Any other things it didn't predict?
Any other things it didn't predict?
Social Media was a fad of the early 21st Century that came to an end after people realised it was slowly eroding society, which, had it continued, would've brought about the downfall of civilisation.
But early on Data would state "accessing" and briefly look to the side, and then recite information. I took that to be him remote accessing the ships computers.Data needed a big honking cable stuck into his head
In a only a few years this is going to cause a significant problem for us, at least in terms of employment. My take is that Humanity deliberately stepped back from what you're referring to. This is why we see engineers on the enterprise, and really people at all.Realistic industrial-style robots and other hardware/software automation.
Regarding Data, that's an interesting take, and if it's what you prefer to think, I'm all for a good retcon or No-Prize. But I'm pretty sure what they were *trying* to depict was him "listening to the voices in his head": either referencing the memories of the colonists or searching an internal database. As for the second, you may be right about it causing problems for a while, but you can't stuff the genie back in the bottle. Our real answer has to be based on making the new robotic productivity work for all - not on trying to ignore it's an option. I've always preferred to assume that humanity as depicted in Star Trek lacks robots because they had a Sky net-like event and it scared hell out of people. I don't really believe *that*, either, though, because aliens would either have them or *be* them, and humans would be forced to have them, too, to compete - in trade, or in battle.But early on Data would state "accessing" and briefly look to the side, and then recite information. I took that to be him remote accessing the ships computers. <snip> In a only a few years this is going to cause a significant problem for us, at least in terms of employment. My take is that Humanity deliberately stepped back from what you're referring to. This is why we see engineers on the enterprise, and really people at all.
Something like that is the usual explaination as to why there no overt genetic engineering, there was the Eugenics Wars and Humanity stepped back from changing ourselves.I've always preferred to assume that humanity as depicted in Star Trek lacks robots because they had a Sky net-like event
Not to mention that it's kind of cowardly for people "boldly going" to be not have bothered to conquer their own boogeymen.Isn't it kind of lazy to play the "once bitten, twice shy" card for everything they don't do?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.