Season 1 Review
Those of you who are familiar with my Voyager reviews already know the formula, but if anybody new has joined in when I started Enterprise then this is how it works; first I analyse the review scores I gave this season, then I judge the writing staff, then I tell you what I would have done differently, then some fun numbers.
I'm going to shake things up with Enterprise by changing the background colour for the graphs, just like The Wire changes the cover of the theme song each season. Yup, I'm just like The Wire; intelligent, funny and highly-realistic.
Ooooooh, grey...
For any Enterprise fans who didn't read the Voyager thread and who weren't put off by my style of reviews, this is how the above graph works: The thick blue line represents the scores for individual episodes between 0-10, the green line (which is difficult to see in this graph) represents the average score for the season, and the red line is a trend-line which shows whether my interest in the show went up or down as the season progressed and how steeply. What is striking about the trend-line in this graph is how level it is, no season of Voyager was as balanced as this, so Enterprise's first season was very consistent in quality. The average score for the season is judged out of 25 episodes (
Broken Bow is counted as one) and the result is 5.16, slightly above average. That may seem low, but only two seasons of Voyager managed to beat it (1 & 4) so it is not a bad position to be in.
This graph is designed to show how many of each score was awarded. What you'd expect to see is some form of bell-curve around the average score for the season, but in this case no episodes were awarded 4 and only one was awarded 5, which is unusual. 6 was the most awarded score with a total of seven episodes, no episode scored 0 and no episode scored a perfect 10.
9 episodes were below average, 1 was average and 15 were above average.
Best episode:
Shuttlepod One
Worst episode:
Acquisition
The Writers
If you haven't been bored away by the graphs above, the purpose of this section is to judge the writers individually and see who I considered to be the weakest links in the writing staff. It started out on Voyager as an attempt to judge Brannon Braga as a writer because of how controversial he is in the Trek community, but I quickly started doing it for all the writers. I only score a person based on the teleplays they are credited for because I believe a good script can overcome a bad story and a bad script can ruin a good story. The two writers from Enterprise that I included in the Voyager graphs were Braga and Mike Sussman (Phyllis Strong and André Bormanis both wrote for Voyager but didn't write enough episodes to be included) and here are their scores:
Braga: 5.417 out of 36 episodes
Sussman: 4.667 out of 6 episodes
Those of you familiar with this feature in the Voyager thread know that I only include writers who wrote at least five episodes over the run of the show. However, since Enterprise only ran for 4 seasons I've decided to cut that number down to three, otherwise the graph wouldn't look as good. Since Rick Berman and Brannon Braga were always credited together they will be treated as one person with the name B&B, naturally. Similarly, Maria & André Jacquemetton wrote their three episodes together so they'll be credited as Mr & Mrs J, and Judith & Garfield Reeves-Stevens wrote all their episodes together so they'll be credited as Mr & Mrs R-S when the time comes.
Things aren't normally this complicated, I can assure you.
The best writer this season is André Bormanis with a score of 7, but that is only based on two episodes so there's still a good chance he is going to screw that up. Up next are B&B with a score of 6.2 out of five episodes, so they're off to a pretty good start. Next is Fred Dekker who only wrote these three episodes in season 1 to get a score of 5.333 (and his bar is light-blue because that is his final score). Up next are Phyllis Strong and Mike Sussman who are writing partners for this season, they earned 4.8 out of five episodes. The Jacquemettons scored 4.667 based on their three episodes. The worst score this season is for Chris Black who only scored 2.5, but that is only out of two episodes so he has a good chance to recover over the next two seasons.
What Would TheGodBen Do?
The year is 2001. UPN want a new Star Trek series so B&B are hired to create it. They do all the work; they come up with the concept, they come up with the characters, they come up with the spaceship... but the hard work gets the better of the both of them and they run away to Florida. UPN needs a new head writer, so they use their time machine to bring me back from the future in order to run the show. What would I have done differently?
I would have preferred for Enterprise to remain closer to Earth; I want to see more of Starfleet, I want to see the human colonies in the Alpha Centauri system, I want to see more of the boomers. As a prequel series, Enterprise gave us a one-off opportunity to explore the gap between now and TOS, and as a Trek fan all my life that would have been far more interesting than exploring some more aliens-of-the-week. All we get from this season is
Terra Nova and
Fortunate Son, neither of which went deep enough into human society. I want to know more about the Vulcans; if they've been in space for thousands of years, how come they're not more advanced? Why are they so interested in human affairs? What is the nature of their conflict with the Andorians? Where are the Tellarites? Who are the Denobulans?
Basically, I wanted this first season to be more like the fourth season but without all the fanwanky bits. This first season isn't bad, but it isn't taking advantage of the premise as it should be (Voyager thread readers will probably remember that line

). I'm reminded of DS9; back in the first season they did alien/anomaly-of-the-week type stories and the show didn't go anywhere, but in season 2 they started to explore Bajoran society and their relationship with the Cardassians, that is when the show got interesting for me. I wanted more universe building, the galaxy would still be out there to explore deeper in later seasons.
I did not want the Temporal Cold War. Time travel can be great fun, but by the final seasons of DS9 and Voyager time-travel was being used badly and lazily, and
Endgame not only took the cake, but it ate it and vomited it all over our faces. I was hoping that Enterprise, being a prequel series, would have escaped the clutches of time travel technology, but instead they made it the central story-arc for the show. Time travel stories in particular have to be crafted, if you just throw the story together randomly as seems to have happened with the TCW then it wont work.
No Klingons, it opened a small continuity issue and it wasn't worth it for what we got. No Ferengi, it opened a small continuity issue and it
certainly wasn't worth it for what we got. No Risa, I didn't want to see Hoshi get laid that much.
(I warned you I'd be uninsightful.)
Statistics
Disappearing Aliens: 11
Archer Abuse: 13
Captain Redshirt: 12
Transporter: 4
Nipples Ahoy!: 6
Season 1 Average: 5.16
Voyager Average After 1 Season: 5.867
In Summation
Enterprise is a good show, it has a good setting with good characters and it is very skilfully produced, but right now it is taking its brilliant premise for granted by doing the same old Trek stories. There's some good character stuff going on, but too often the characters are being led by the plot rather than the other way around. There's something special here, the writers just need to find a way to get at it. Unfortunately, if my memory serves me correctly, season 2 will not find it and the good stuff that they did manage to find for the first season is about to dry up.