which forums? there's people on many forums who, in my opinion, can be bastards. even this one.
which forums? there's people on many forums who, in my opinion, can be bastards. even this one.
which forums? there's people on many forums who, in my opinion, can be bastards. even this one.
Helen Raynor was shaking after reading the forums? If it was after her Dalek 2 parter, I'm not surprised. Also explains why her next story was much better.
I've seen plenty personal insults for Chris Chibnall...
What's wrong with "42"? It succeeds at exactly what it's trying to be -- a season 5 "base under siege" story.That particular honour still belonged to "Fear Her" at the time her episodes aired, though "42" later surpassed it.
When nothing is real and nothing is fixed, it can go anywhere. The Maybe is a hell of a place to live. As well as being the best place in the world.
What's wrong with "42"? It succeeds at exactly what it's trying to be -- a season 5 "base under siege" story.That particular honour still belonged to "Fear Her" at the time her episodes aired, though "42" later surpassed it.
Still, Raynor struck me as attracting a lot more personal attacks than any other writer of bad Doctor Who episodes, and her Dalek two-parter wasn't the worst story the revived DW has yet produced. (That particular honour still belonged to "Fear Her" at the time her episodes aired, though "42" later surpassed it.)
Still, Raynor struck me as attracting a lot more personal attacks than any other writer of bad Doctor Who episodes, and her Dalek two-parter wasn't the worst story the revived DW has yet produced. (That particular honour still belonged to "Fear Her" at the time her episodes aired, though "42" later surpassed it.)
Which strikes me as odd - while none of them are what you might call "classics," I liked both "Fear Her" and "42" far, far more than Raynor's Dalek two-parter (her Sontaran piece was great, though).
Still, Raynor struck me as attracting a lot more personal attacks than any other writer of bad Doctor Who episodes, and her Dalek two-parter wasn't the worst story the revived DW has yet produced. (That particular honour still belonged to "Fear Her" at the time her episodes aired, though "42" later surpassed it.)
Which strikes me as odd - while none of them are what you might call "classics," I liked both "Fear Her" and "42" far, far more than Raynor's Dalek two-parter (her Sontaran piece was great, though).
"42" was ok - I hated "Fear Her" and still do. I think the problem was that she was using the Daleks, and yeah, they've had their share of crap stories over the forty-five years of Who, but they are still kind of a big deal - a crap Dalek story was always going to attract more negative attention than a crap monster of the week story.
Which strikes me as odd - while none of them are what you might call "classics," I liked both "Fear Her" and "42" far, far more than Raynor's Dalek two-parter (her Sontaran piece was great, though).
"42" was ok - I hated "Fear Her" and still do. I think the problem was that she was using the Daleks, and yeah, they've had their share of crap stories over the forty-five years of Who, but they are still kind of a big deal - a crap Dalek story was always going to attract more negative attention than a crap monster of the week story.
Which would be fair enough, if people restricted their attacks to the work itself.
To be fair, though, I have seen a lot of venom spewed at Russell T Davies personally rather than professionally, though I presume that this has more to do with his greater public visibility as the (ex-)showrunner of Doctor Who - though I'm not unmindful of the fact that every now and then, one runs into some fairly disgusting bits of homophobia against the man.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.