I'm not so sure the US will be around by then, we might be a third world country by then.
Right. Just because we won't be top dog anymore doesn't mean we'll be a Third World country. Though some people might feel like it's the same thing.

I'm not so sure the US will be around by then, we might be a third world country by then.
*snip*
*snip*
All of your points of issue ignore the rapidly closing gap between developing and developed nations and the corresponding increasing correlation between population and national power.
By 2100 Turkey's population will outstrip that of any EU member and be coupled with a similar level of development. Conversely, Russia's will fall significantly over the same period.
Culture plays a huge role in development that you are totally overlooking.
Culture plays a huge role in development that you are totally overlooking.
No, I'm not. That's why I'm assigning the United States and the European Union, separately, equal footing with China in 2100, when merely in terms of GDP China will almost certainly surpass both the EU and United States combined.
The structural advantages are very much meaningful across a generation or two. But they didn't save the United Kingdom from being eclipsed by a rising Germany, and they won't 'save' Germany from being eclipsed by Turkey over the course of the next century either.
Personally, I don't think all ex-Warsaw Pact country are ready to join the EU (in fact, I think that the accession on Bulgaria and Romania was premature), but in general terms 50 years of Soviet domination is nothing compared to the centuries of common social, cultural, and economic history.i don't think Russia'll ever join the EU. hell, they don't even like the ex-WarPac nations and Soviet republics joining the EU and NATO...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.