
And most importantly, will Kate finally get to meet The Thirteenth Doctor?!
Is it really that big of a spoiler if I correctly guessed what the video was about before I clicked on it?The Dr Who Flux FB page MAY have given away a big spoiler in their post today while posting a video from last season.
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=3114156545528427
Ditto.I am dreading this one. And no, I don’t think everything’s getting wrapped up here.
Another thing that may not have been mentioned here: The color of the Doctor Who logo on social media has gradually shifted from orange to blue in recent weeks. Orange, as in this whoniverse, vs blue, as in the new one...
Hard disagree. I loved his "scourge of scoundrels" line.Easiest test to check just HOW bad a writer Chibnall is? Not even able to give a certaiin character a decent final line.
You mean Eustacius Jericho? That's a pretty damn memorable name.Last thought: Oh, man. Why do we have to keep Dan? Couldn't the old guy get a memorable name and stay in the TARDIS, instead?
That annoyed me, too. Hopefully she'll get more to do in her next appearance (rumored to be in one of the specials).There is something very "odd" (for want of a better word) about the Chibnall-era of Who. It seems to be defined by "tell, don't show". For example, in tonight's episode we have Kate saying she is leading the human resistance. But, what exactly does that mean? We don't see her do anything before the Doctor arrives. We don't see her leading other people as part of a campaign. She just says it. And because of this, I am not sure why she was in the episode. As much as I love the character, I am not sure what exactly she contributed here. Bit like Captain Jack in the last Dalek special.
That, too, greatly bothered me. It's as if they ran out of money for special effects after doing the Flux and the destruction of the Daleks and Cybermen. I would've preferred dropping the Daleks and Cybermen altogether in order to give more weight to the Sontaran attack against the Lupari.The Sontarans say they killed on the dog-aliens protecting Earth, almost as a throwaway line, with a brief description of what they did. But not even a hint of a battle shown.
I feel, though, that while BF has been making fairly standard, unexciting plot-driven stories as of late, more driven by era-specific nostalgia than actual good storymaking, I will excuse them cause they're tie-in media, and they can't be allowed to innovate (the most meaningful time they ever did anyway was with the Sixth and Eighth, and outside that with Torchwood due to RTD's direct hand behind the scenes). Hell, even they can still pull the occassional masterstroke - just this month, the Ninth Doctor Adventures includes Monsters of Metropolis, and its a legitimate gem, and serious contender for the best audio of the Ninth and indeed the year (certainly one of the best five, IMO).There is something very "odd" (for want of a better word) about the Chibnall-era of Who. It seems to be defined by "tell, don't show". For example, in tonight's episode we have Kate saying she is leading the human resistance. But, what exactly does that mean? We don't see her do anything before the Doctor arrives. We don't see her leading other people as part of a campaign. She just says it. And because of this, I am not sure why she was in the episode. As much as I love the character, I am not sure what exactly she contributed here. Bit like Captain Jack in the last Dalek special.
The Sontarans say they killed on the dog-aliens protecting Earth, almost as a throwaway line, with a brief description of what they did. But not even a hint of a battle shown.
It reminds me of the finale of last series where the Doctor was trapped in the Matrix for most of it and the Master explained everything about the Timeless Child.
At times it comes across as a bad Big Finish story, except some of them feel more visual than the current tv episodes.
I wasn't even trying to be "funny", I literally didn't remember the name. Still enjoyed the character more than Dan, though. The more I think about it, the more ticked off I am that he was offed.You mean Eustacius Jericho? That's a pretty damn memorable name.
Way too little, and as an expsense over other, uninteresting storylines.Yeah, I would've liked to have seen more of him but I'm okay with what we got.
The other thing that comes to me from reading your and Csalem's posts is how rushed the entire conclusion seemed. For weeks the most ardent Chib fans have said that the reason the early episodes had such haphazard plotting and too many plotlines going at the same time was because he knew exactly what he was doing (lol) and that it would all make sense at the end.That annoyed me, too. Hopefully she'll get more to do in her next appearance (rumored to be in one of the specials).
That, too, greatly bothered me. It's as if they ran out of money for special effects after doing the Flux and the destruction of the Daleks and Cybermen. I would've preferred dropping the Daleks and Cybermen altogether in order to give more weight to the Sontaran attack against the Lupari.
From Tecteun's perspective, yes, but The Doctor barely knows her because of her stolen memories.BTW, not a single Tecteun reference. Not saying she should have been a focal point, but... I dunno, not even a glimpse of a subconscious sense of loss for the Doctor? That woman's her oldest acquaintance by Chibnall's accounts!
So is she dead now, or is the lady Doctor getting a special before she goes?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.