According to Star Trek Movie Memories Gene Roddenberry angrily phoned his lawyer and wanted 15 minutes of TUC's more militaristic aspects edited out of the film.
I could be mistaken, but weren't those scenes all part of the longer international release?I can see where Paramount would do something like that just to get the movie cut down to 109 minutes the theatrical was.
Interesting how fast and easy Meyer dropped in those scenes just five months later for the video release---
No double-dipping back then, a longer cut right off the bat, first release.
I could be mistaken, but weren't those scenes all part of the longer international release?
I could be mistaken, but weren't those scenes all part of the longer international release?
Was there really a longer theatrical release internationally? Certainly not in Australia. We got it a few weeks after USA, and had no "West reveal" scene until the VHS came out.
The theatrical version has never actually been released commercially on home video or DVD.
I still swear that the West reveal was in the cut I saw in the theaters... It's certainly within reason that my memory is flawed, but I really remember his scenes being in the cut I saw in the theaters...
I've just watched TUC and read that Roddenberry said he considered parts of the film apocryphal. Which parts did he mean specifically? I thought the film was great and an important entry into Star Trek canon.
Either add something substantive to the discussion or bugger off, please.Among the worst of all Trek films. Total crap. Best to forget it ever happened.
I added an equal amount of substance to the post prior
Okay, fine...poorly written, poorly executed. Ignored established Trek lore (Klingon blood is suddenly bright pink? News to TNG). Trite scripting and an overly dependent concept based on the political situation of the day (making it immediately dated and disposable).
In Trek V we were chums with the Klingons...now we're bitter enemies again? This movie was TEH SUXOR! And it had the stink of Nick Meyer all over it. How many movies has he directed again? He got kinda lucky with Khan. He did NOT recapture it with VI.
Okay, fine...poorly written, poorly executed. Ignored established Trek lore (Klingon blood is suddenly bright pink? News to TNG). Trite scripting and an overly dependent concept based on the political situation of the day (making it immediately dated and disposable).
In Trek V we were chums with the Klingons...now we're bitter enemies again? This movie was TEH SUXOR! And it had the stink of Nick Meyer all over it. How many movies has he directed again? He got kinda lucky with Khan. He did NOT recapture it with VI.
I could be mistaken, but weren't those scenes all part of the longer international release?I can see where Paramount would do something like that just to get the movie cut down to 109 minutes the theatrical was.
Interesting how fast and easy Meyer dropped in those scenes just five months later for the video release---
No double-dipping back then, a longer cut right off the bat, first release.
Okay, fine...poorly written, poorly executed. Ignored established Trek lore (Klingon blood is suddenly bright pink? News to TNG). Trite scripting and an overly dependent concept based on the political situation of the day (making it immediately dated and disposable).
In Trek V we were chums with the Klingons...now we're bitter enemies again? This movie was TEH SUXOR! And it had the stink of Nick Meyer all over it. How many movies has he directed again? He got kinda lucky with Khan. He did NOT recapture it with VI.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.