Thank you, finally. I am tired of the feeling that I am the only person who feels not only that this episode is bad, but it is embarassing.
William Campbell, brilliantly cast as Trelane, is horribly cast as the most non threatening Klingon ever.
The writing is on par with a mediocre episode of Three's Company. Trek can be funny, look at A Piece of the Action. In that episode the writers gave a reaon for the crew to act as they did and hence the humour of the situation. In Tribbles you have "the best crew in the fleet" in a situation where they are risking interplanetary war. How do they deal with it, bad puns.
Please people, tell me I am not the only person embarassed by this episode.
Roddenberry had been away when "I, Mudd" and "The Trouble With Tribbles" were produced on Gene Coon's authority, and when GR got back he was not amused. Apparently he felt the humour was overdone and he didn't care much for those episodes.
The only episode of Star Trek I find embarrasing is The Changeling.
The only episode of Star Trek I find embarrasing is The Changeling.
The only episode of Star Trek I find embarrasing is The Changeling.
The only episode of Star Trek I find embarrasing is The Changeling.
"And the Children Shall Lead" for me.
"The Trouble With Tribbles" is an amusing episode, but not a truly funny one. It has some nice moments, but again it's not hilarious. I do prefer it over the embarrassment of "I, Mudd."David Gerrold's contributions to STAR TREK are way overrated, in my opinion - TROUBLE with TRIBBLES, in particular. But what can you do about who had Gene's "ear" at what time? Like how John Logan with his head rammed up Brent Spiner's ass gave us NEMESIS. Lots of people love that installment, too and rail on about how wonderful that is. The humour in the TRIBBLES episode is just lame, that's all. If it were actually "funny," it would rock. But as it is, it's just cheesey. It's a lot like VOYAGE HOME, in that regard. Nicolas Meyer, for someone who's reputed to be the rebel of STAR TREK, with Oh, such a complete DISS-regard for it's Traditions, and all, the humour of STAR TREK IV is surprisingly neutered and stale. The idea of little fur ball parasites causing Kirk and company alot of grief is interesting and I can see how girls, especially, would think they were cute, but, uh ... this episode does nothing for me.
Whether or not it's overrated, I can well appreciate having seen the show too many times. The many years of watching Trek have made me feel the series is overrated by die hards. It's a fun show which I enjoy much more than the later TV incarnations as none of the other series had the Trinity. But the 60's had plenty of other shows that I can enjoy just as much, if not more, since I don't have them so ingrained that a half second in the whole episode has replayed in my head.But anyway, getting back to "Tribbles", I agree that it's overrated. I don't find much in it funny any more, but I may have just seen it too many times. The barroom fight, starting with the exchange that sets it off, is still funny to me. I guess Kirk buried almost to his chest in the tribble pile is funny enough, too.
I agree, to the extent that it's often rated as one of the two or three best (and sometimes the very best). I'd put it in the top twenty.
Tribbles marked the decline of TOS. All of the best episodes were before Tribbles; the worst (except for Alternative Factor) were after. Before Tribbles, most of the episodes were good; after, there were more bad than good.
From what I understand the idea of Koloth being a recurring villain was floated and Gene Coon liked the idea, but Roddenberry wasn't for it. Apparently his reasoning was in a vast galaxy where the Enterprise was crossing fantastic distances it beggared belief that Kirk could keep running into the same adversary over and over again.
And yet it was okay to keep running into parallel Earths.
...in a vast galaxy where the Enterprise was crossing fantastic distances it beggared belief that Kirk could keep running into the same adversary over and over again.
This also ties into why TOS wasn't one to revisit places and characters it had encountered before (save semi-recurring crew characters aboard ship). The idea was the Enterprise was going forward, not backwards.
And with this in mind this was one of the things I didn't care for in TNG because I felt it was counter to the idea of the starship going into new territory.
If you look at it in production order, "Journey to Babel", "Obsession", "Return to Tomorrow" and "The Ultimate Computer" all were made after "Trouble..."
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.