• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Star Wars problem

I think the success of Rogue One has already proven this isn't true.
Maybe but we still got to see Darth Vadar and Peter Cushing and Leia. Also the movie is basically just fan fiction in trying to explain away the open port on the Death Star and show how the alliance got that info. It was intresting fan fiction for sure but it still relies a lot on the Classic movies to be popular. Maybe it's more acurate to wonder how successful the movies will be the more they move away from having to do stuff that ties into the classic movies.

Jason
 
I mean, it had Tarkin and Vader and was heavily reliant on OT iconography and organizations (Empire and Rebels).
I really don't think people give a h**k about the the First Order and the Resistance in that way or to that degree.
The only reason that audiences care about the Empire and the Rebels is because the Original Trilogy was so well executed. If the Sequel Trilogy maintains a high level of quality and proves at least as entertaining to at least as many people, people will care about the First Order and the Resistance to the same degree. After only one film, it's really unfair to expect the Sequel Trilogy to be as beloved as the Original Trilogy. The Original Trilogy was not one film, it was three, and the original film alone was utterly groundbreaking. People who weren't alive at the time can't really appreciate just how monumentally revolutionary the original Star Wars film was when it was released. Give the Sequel Trilogy time to catch up.
 
The only reason that audiences care about the Empire and the Rebels is because the Original Trilogy was so well executed. If the Sequel Trilogy maintains a high level of quality and proves at least as entertaining to at least as many people, people will care about the First Order and the Resistance to the same degree. After only one film, it's really unfair to expect the Sequel Trilogy to be as beloved as the Original Trilogy. The Original Trilogy was not one film, it was three, and the original film alone was utterly groundbreaking. People who weren't alive at the time can't really appreciate just how monumentally revolutionary the original Star Wars film was when it was released. Give the Sequel Trilogy time to catch up.
I agree and I was including all of the original movies and not just the first one. I think the new characters have also been well done but I still feel they are sort of working with a safety net by having so many familiar stuff in the films. I'm not really thinking about the episode 8 or 9 but more about future stand alone movies or even this idea of going back in the past even way before the prequels.
Also I think something is going to give by having so many "Star Wars" movies. "Star Wars" use to be a franchise that stood above everything else because almost nobody disliked them and you could even be open about liking them even if you were"cool" or "mainstream" or whatever term so called normal people want to use to describe themselves.
With so many movies though I feel like it will get to a point were it's just another franchise among a slew of them. A "Star Wars" movie will feel about as special as the latest reboot of "Halloween" or "Terminator."

Jason
 
The only reason that audiences care about the Empire and the Rebels is because the Original Trilogy was so well executed.


Which part of the SW audience are you talking about? I'm a fan of "THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK", but I've never given "REBELS" a second thought. And as far as I'm concerned, the Original Trilogy was about as well executed as the Prequel Trilogy - well written, but with some flaws. At the moment, I'm not that impressed by the Sequel Trilogy. But I believe Rian Johnson can finally get it on track.
 
He said "the Rebels" not Rebels.


My mistake.

Speaking of "the Rebels", one of the reasons why I'm a little off with the Sequel Trilogy is that Disney is basically retreading old ground by trying to remake the main narrative of the Original Trilogy, but with new characters and a few changes.

The studio and Lucasfilm should really consider trying to stop sucking on the "Original Trilogy" teat. It's getting old.
 
Last edited:
One of the reasons why I'm a little off with the Sequel Trilogy is that Disney is basically retreading old ground by trying to remake the main narrative of the Original Trilogy, but with new characters and a few changes.
I really wish that hadn't happened as well. I'm still in for TLJ.
 
I like the characters from both the OT and the ST, thus far. I feel like they are real people, in a real place have identifiable struggles. I'm engaged with their struggle and want to see the heroes succeed.

For me, in the PT, the "downsides" are the characters. And that might not impact others the same way, but it impacts me. I don't find Anakin to be a fully fleshed out character, save for brief moments. So, the PT fails to engage me on a character level.

That will always be the difference for me, and it's a big gap.
 
I like the characters from both the OT and the ST, thus far. I feel like they are real people, in a real place have identifiable struggles. I'm engaged with their struggle and want to see the heroes succeed.

For me, in the PT, the "downsides" are the characters. And that might not impact others the same way, but it impacts me. I don't find Anakin to be a fully fleshed out character, save for brief moments. So, the PT fails to engage me on a character level.

That will always be the difference for me, and it's a big gap.


One of the main reasons why I enjoyed the PT so much was the characterizations. For me, they were complex, ambiguous and interesting.
 
... Also the movie is basically just fan fiction in trying to explain away the open port on the Death Star and show how the alliance got that info...

Have to disagree on this technical point.

Produced by non-official sources for pure enjoyment and no profit = fan fiction.
Produced by official sources, released as 'canon', and makes money =/= fan fiction.

Just because you don't like or agree with something that Lucasfilm puts out doesn't make it fan fiction. If it did, the entire PT would be 'fan fiction' by Lucas in my book. Now if I actually claimed that, I would be laughed off the boards and rightly so. Same principle applies with Rogue 1. Personally, I thought retroactively plugging one of the biggest plot holes in the entire SW 'verse was a fairly clever move, but it wasn't the entire motivation for making that movie.
 
Last edited:
I mean, it had Tarkin and Vader and was heavily reliant on OT iconography and organizations (Empire and Rebels).
I really don't think people give a h**k about the the First Order and the Resistance in that way or to that degree.
Of course people aren't going to be as into the new characters, very very few characters ever reach the iconic level of characters like Luke, Leia, and Han and honestly I find it kind of unfair to critisize the new movies for not being at that level. But I think it's pretty clear from the reactions people have to Daisy Ridley, John Boyega and Oscar Isaac at places like Celebration and the comic-cons that people do give a fuck about Rey, Finn and Poe. Since TFA came out I've seen just as plenty of merchandise with them on it, so obviously there is at least some level of interest there.
My mistake.

Speaking of "the Rebels", one of the reasons why I'm a little off with the Sequel Trilogy is that Disney is basically retreading old ground by trying to remake the main narrative of the Original Trilogy, but with new characters and a few changes.
That was a one time thing for TFA, which they did on purpose to try to ease fans back into this version of the Star Wars, it does appear that they'll be moving away from that with The Last Jedi and EPIX.
 
Last edited:
Of course people aren't going to be as into the new characters, very very few characters ever reach the iconic level of characters like Luke, Leia, and Han and honestly I find it kind of unfair to citizens the new movies for not being at that level. But I think it's pretty clear from the reactions people have to Daisy Ridley, John Boyega and Oscar Isaac at places like Celebration and the comic-cons that people do give a fuck about Rey, Finn and Poe. Since TFA came out I've seen just as plenty of merchandise with them on it, so obviously there is at least some level of interest there.

That was a one time thing for TFA, which they did on purpose to try to ease fans back into this version of the Star Wars, it does appear that they'll be moving away from that with The Last Jedi and EPIX.
Exactly so.

Though, @JD, you spelled "citizens" when I think you meant "criticize." Just a head's up.
 
Oops, I'll fix that. I misspelled it and I just clicked on the first option in the spell check without actually reading it.
 
That was a one time thing for TFA, which they did on purpose to try to ease fans back into this version of the Star Wars, it does appear that they'll be moving away from that with The Last Jedi and EPIX.

I disagree. TFA poisoned the well as far as originality and distinction from the OT in the ST.
-We now have a new Evil Empire and a new Rebellion, complete with the new Rebellion being underdogs and the new Empire being the big guys. (remember that the Republic fleet AND place of government was destroyed).
-We also have a kid who is strong in the force that is being trained in a remote location by a self exiled Jedi Master.
-And to top it off, we a have an Evil Emperor expy as well
-Not to mention so many other same-y things like Kylo being the bad guy who answers to the Emperor and has a destiny intwined with our Jedi hero.

If you care at all about originality, Star Wars is a husk of its former self.
BUT Rian Johnson will make as good a movie that can be made from the dregs of TFA because he's a talented guy.
Colin Trevorrow however is a hack of the highest order so IX will be as bad if not worse than TFA.
 
If you care at all about originality, Star Wars is a husk of its former self.
The OT lifted from many sources, including 1930s serials, samurai movies, and westerns. And also, there's also NNUTS to consider (Nothing New Under The Sun). There's no such thing as true originality, all the stories have been told, everything's a regurgitation in some manner or another.
 
The OT lifted from many sources, including 1930s serials, samurai movies, and westerns. And also, there's also NNUTS to consider (Nothing New Under The Sun). There's no such thing as true originality, all the stories have been told, everything's a regurgitation in some manner or another.
You're just playing Devil's Advocate. My last post shows you just how uninspired the ST is.
The PT didn't feel a need to hew so close to the OT in story.
TPM also parallels ANH, but it's much less of a beat for beat copy than TFA.
 
I disagree. TFA poisoned the well as far as originality and distinction from the OT in the ST.
-We now have a new Evil Empire and a new Rebellion, complete with the new Rebellion being underdogs and the new Empire being the big guys. (remember that the Republic fleet AND place of government was destroyed).
-We also have a kid who is strong in the force that is being trained in a remote location by a self exiled Jedi Master.
-And to top it off, we a have an Evil Emperor expy as well
-Not to mention so many other same-y things like Kylo being the bad guy who answers to the Emperor and has a destiny intwined with our Jedi hero.

If you care at all about originality, Star Wars is a husk of its former self.
BUT Rian Johnson will make as good a movie that can be made from the dregs of TFA because he's a talented guy.
Colin Trevorrow however is a hack of the highest order so IX will be as bad if not worse than TFA.
The stuff you're talking about is just the basic surface elements, what really matters is how the smaller elements play out, and we still don't know how happen in TLJ or EPIX.
And I call bullshit on the whole idea of Star Wars ever having had any originality to begin with. The OT was great, but there was barely an original idea in it. Pretty much every element of the movies, especially ANH, can be tracked back to an earlier source. Don't get me wrong, I love the movies, they're a blast, but to suddenly hold them up as a paragon of originality is ridiculous.
 
The stuff you're talking about is just the basic surface elements, what really matters is how the smaller elements play out, and we still don't know how happen in TLJ or EPIX.
And I call bullshit on the whole idea of Star Wars ever having had any originality to begin with. The OT was great, but there was barely an original idea in it. Pretty much every element of the movies, especially ANH, can be tracked back to an earlier source. Don't get me wrong, I love the movies, they're a blast, but to suddenly hold them up as a paragon of originality is ridiculous.
As I already stated, as an example- TPM paralleled ANH without being a straight up ripoff like TFA.
TFA sets the stage for an underdog rebellion facing a big bad empire AGAIN when they could have done ANYTHING, storywise.
 
One of the main reasons why I enjoyed the PT so much was the characterizations. For me, they were complex, ambiguous and interesting.

Ummm.. yeah.... Riiight.

meesaoffensive.png



As I already stated, as an example- TPM paralleled ANH without being a straight up ripoff like TFA.

It was more original but the execution was worse. Pick your poison.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top