• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Squire Of Gothos

Mendon

Lieutenant Commander
Red Shirt
The Enterprise crew is again confronted by a being of enormous power. This particular run-in is unique for two reasons, however: the antics of this individual are deliciously chaotic, and we're treated to a nice little twist at the end. By virtue of these strengths, The Squire Of Gothos manages to escape the pits of been there, done that. Still, comparisons can certainly be made to Charlie X, where the omnipotent being of the week was likewise trapped in childhood, but the execution here is far different. In Charlie X, the guest star's youth is known from the beginning, however, and this is made central to the drama, detailing Charlie's difficulties in entering not only human society in general, but adulthood more specifically. In The Squire Of Gothos, our guest star's youth is revealed in a twist ending. Although each character is retrieved by their parents in virtually the same manner, Charlie's retrieval bears a note of tragedy, as he fails to attain his goals of joining humanity, while Trelane's comes as nothing short of a relief. The two episodes form an interesting case study in how divergent approaches to similar material can bear far different results.

As an aside, I like to play with the idea that Trelane might be Q's child from Star Trek: Voyager, and that the father that coddles him at the episode's close would therefore be Q. :)
 
I love the performances in this one: especially Trelane.

Unfortunately the last scene ruins it for me. Three words spring to mind: Deus, Ex and Machina...
 
Deus ex machina, like any other narrative device, can be used well or poorly. For me, this was a pretty terrific example, because it manages to surprise, but also makes perfect sense in the context of what has previously occurred. In fact, I think the more satisfying deus ex machina is what edges this one out over Charlie X for me.
 
Also, if one is not allowed to use Deus ex machina, how can one write a story about deities? If gods are prominently on display for most of the episode, should they suddenly disappear in the final act?

...Really, that might have been worth an episode. What if one relied on gods for most of the story, and in the end they failed to deliver, no explanation given? Oddly enough, even DS9 didn't really try that one.

Timo Saloniemi
 
Well, you could argue that "Who Mourns for Adonais?" was a failed-god episode - that is, when we first meet Apollo, we don't know whether he is truly omnipotent or has any vulnerabilities. He does just give up in the end; to himself he remains godlike, and his late comrades who "cast themselves upon the wind" didn't have their godhood challenged before doing so, presumably. They were, as judged by his monologue about them, just tired of living, and he himself probably was too.
 
What was the machine in the mirror for if Trelane didn't really need it towards the end? Was it akin to a toddlers walking harness?
 
Didn't they explain in one of the novels that Trelane was a Q? It's been a while, but I thought I had read that somewhere...
 
Sure they did - but it doesn't fool anybody. His parents weren't Q: no Q would stoop to manifesting as a disinteresting midair blob of green ectoplasm and speaking platitudes, and least of all apologizing for what one of them had done.

Some other critter we've seen before or since, perhaps (might be one of Apollo's folks). Perhaps some sort of a Q mongrel adopted by parents from another species. But not Q born of Q.

Timo Saloniemi
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top