• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Special Editions Turn Twenty

Anakin's appearance as a Force Ghost is another matter, because that's the idealized, youthful appearance of him. So it makes sense that Hayden plays that version.
It makes sense if you force that justification on it, yeah. Shaw's Anakin ghost made sense just fine for decades.
 
Why does Luke know who the hell he is?

What no one mentions is how terrible the sound mix of Star Wars is in the SEs. EVERYTHING beeps and boops.
 
Considering how often they've gone back to fiddle with it, I'm surprised it isn't much worse actually. The last few revisions sound like they only bothered to make the audio decent enough for the average living room TV setup. I don't expect they even bothered to go back to the masters for the new sound mix, just plugged it into a second or even third generation track.
 
I would assume there is footage of Anakin Skywalker from the Clone Wars, that Luke eventually found.
 
Still, it kind of raises the question, if Anakin's ghost is younger, why isn't Obi-Wan's?
The logic is that Anakin reverted to good person he was before he was Darth Vader. Obi-Wan was a good person right up until he died, so that's what he looks like. From a mythological standpoint, I think that actually makes a lot more sense.
From a logical standpoint it makes even more sense as Shaw looked (and was) about a decade older the Guinness, which of course shouldn't be the case. If we proceed on the assumption that his immersion in the dark side prematurely aged him (at least outwardly) then it makes even less sense for Shaw. Also, the version of Anakin that looks like Shaw never had hair...or limbs. So then it becomes much less a "true self" image and more of a "what if". As in "what if he was never evil and lived to 80."

That said, I fully expect that if ghost Kenobi shows up in the new films it'll be McGregor, in which case it's flexible as to how a force apparition manifests. Probably the simplest way around it is that the image is at least partly subjective from the POV of the one seeing them.
 
Last edited:
If you look at the camera angles used in the Vader unmasking scene I imagine from a technical viewpoint it would be very easy to do this. Maybe Lucas had this idea all along and had Richard Marquand shoot it that way, and for some reason didn't follow through. On the subject of the quality of the CGI, many of the space battle scenes in 'A New Hope' still stand up and the Mos Eisle scenes can be given a 'fresh coat of CGI paint' especially the Jabba scene. Jedi is the one that needs the most work in my opinion. I'd have a CGI Rancor monster and maybe revisit the speeder-bike chase.
There are also a number of deleted scenes from Empire and Jedi which I think were good character moments that I'd put back in such as C3P0 tricking the Stormtroopers into encountering the Hoth monsters (with the previous scene establishing that the rebels have the creature also inserted). The longer scene with Luke and the others in the sick bay as well as the fate of Lando's computer aide Lobot. On Jedi the scene of the Imperial Officer who Vader encounters in the opening scene, raising objections during the battle to using the Death Star and the little battle Han & the rebels have when they first try to enter the shield generator.
 
Because they showed the most restraint. But making Luke scream is unacceptable and a good example of something that clearly wasn't "the original intent" or "what we would have done if we could" made even more of a good example by the fact that it was removed in later revisions.
 
It makes sense if you force that justification on it, yeah. Shaw's Anakin ghost made sense just fine for decades.

I never understood putting Christensen's Anakin in the force ghost because when Anakin was turned into Vader, he was a teenager. Shaw's Anakin was more adult, which made better sense at the time.
 
Having the option I'll always watch the SE over the OE, don't care what them Star Wars hippsters think.:nyah::ouch:
 
In all honesty, I actually enjoy Jedi Rocks. It is kind of a catchy tune.
I just watched a clip of the two back to back, and I like the Jedi Rocks song better, but the original scene is a better scene. In the original the old song was just a part of the setting as they're showing Jaba's thrown room, but the Special Edtion basically turned it into a music video in the middle of a Star Wars movie. I can see where it might seem like kind of a fun idea, but it was really unnecessary.
 
Not to mention Sy Snootles and the other guy singing into camera, and the funky music downplaying the Jabba vs Oola sequence. (Was that his intention? Who knows.)
 
Not to mention Sy Snootles and the other guy singing into camera, and the funky music downplaying the Jabba vs Oola sequence. (Was that his intention? Who knows.)
If so, then it was a bit of a strange choice to film new footage of her in the rancor den. Perhaps part of it was to increase the tonal contrast rather than mitigate it?

As for the singing into camera thing, if you look there are little floating devices around the stage which one can assume are holo-recorders. I take those shots as POVs. They're rare in Star Wars movies but hardly unprecedented.
 
John Williams' music at the end of ROTJ is much better than the original but, quite possibly, the ten year old me would've preferred the original. But there again, that ten year old kid didn't realise what a kiddie movie ROTJ really is.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top