• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

the plot thickens...

Have you ever been watching a TREK episode, or movie, and thought of a cool way to take the plot/story, but they didn’t, and you thought, after seeing how they went with theirs, yours would have been better??? It has been bantered about before, but the moment Jennifer was ‘killled’ by the Borg, I always thought she should have appeared on Voyager…

Or when Kirk and company beamed up the airforce pilot? Why not take him into the future and have him join the show as ‘one of us’.

What about you? Any plot twists you would have taken that they didn’t?

Rob
 
I'd have liked to have had Shelby hang around for a little while, maybe as Riker's XO for a couple more episodes while Picard recovered and recouperated.
 
I'd have liked to have had Shelby hang around for a little while, maybe as Riker's XO for a couple more episodes while Picard recovered and recouperated.

I would have gone the entire way and killed picard and have Riker take over. I think juggling up the cast like that can make a show fresh, and, more realistic...

Rob
 
but the moment Jennifer was ‘killled’ by the Borg, I always thought she should have appeared on Voyager…
If you are referring to Jennifer Sicko, she was blown all to shreds along with her ship. I don't think the Borg were too interested in assimilating during that particular battle for some reason.

Along with keeping Shelby around, maybe instead of having it because Picard needs rest have him remain as Locutus for a while longer and stretch BoBW Pt2 out into an arc. This would have allowed the writers to come up with a better way to destroy the Borg ship other than having it blow up because the Borg all were regenerating at once. Like surge suppression technology is new to them.

But then, TNG didn't exactly do arcs, so the plot had to be wrapped up in two episodes. Shame.
 
Yep. I've done a lot of Star Trek rewriting in my head. :D I'll limit myself to my Big Three Demands:

Borg
- Cool it with them after First Contact. Rescind the whole Borg Queen notion (it was probably necessary for the movie), and institute strict instuctions that nobody is ever allowed to be assimilated and then de-assimilated ever again; have the Borg permanently assimilate a main character (I would have done that rather than introduce Seven on VOY - have Paris or somebody become a recurring Borg character who is with the Collective, not on the ship); and not allow the Borg to lose fights with the Feds any more often than one time out of ten.

The Borg lost credibility the way they were kicked around and turned into jokes, and all they have is their credibility. Oh, and no Borg dissenters or any of that other crap. The Borg work best when kept very simple and straightforward. They should be used sparingly and when they appear, they should be more terrifying because of that.

Sisko - I'd put him on a different character arc as of "Rapture" (mid-S5). By telling the Bajorans to stay neutral in the war, on orders from the Prophets, Sisko sided with his role as a Bajoran religious figure over his duty as a Starfleet officer. He advised the Bajorans to go against Federation interests, on orders of alien beings who very well may have been in cahoots with the Dominion - or at least Starfleet would have to be very gullible, if not stupid, not to worry about that possibility.

Rather than have Starfleet be weirdly complacent about the commander of a key outpost in time of war doing something that could be interpreted as either moronic or treasonous, Starfleet should have pushed back, telling Sisko that he needs to choose Starfleet or the Bajorans. They can't afford divided loyalties. The shootin-war that breaks out not long after "Rapture" would have back burnered this story but it would have returned as of mid-S6 and should have been a central theme till the end of the series.

And there's no need to worry that the story would have been screwed up by having Sisko booted from command of DS9 - since that would have antagonized the Bajorans, Starfleet would not have been able to do that. But having hands tied by a bunch of religious fanatics and a rogue Stafleet officer should not have sat well with Starfleet - I wanted to see a lot more drama on that score.

Dukat - Making him a true believer of the paghwraith was silly. It would have been far more in character for him to cynically treat the paghwraith as just more aliens to be manipulated in his grand schemes of power. And very true to the character that he would assume he could "handle" them. Having Dukat be more in control of the situation and thinking how to turn it to his advantage, combined with Sisko who is losing the backing of Starfleet yet adamantly convinced he is on the right path, could have made the final showdown between them more than just silly video-game level nonsense. It would have been cynicism, represented by Dukat, vs faith, represented by Sisko.
 
VOY "Fury" -- I'd start by substituting a more likely plot -- should have ended with the death of Kes from old age. Creating a character whose life span is only about 9 years and then not playing that story out was lame.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top