The Pegasus/Treaty of Algeron
- Thread starter indolover
- Start date
Star Trek III screwed things. The original idea for the heavies was Romulans with their Romulan Bird of Prey. But then, they changed it to Klingons, but kept the BOP concept and the cloaking device.
In TOS, the Romulans were nothing special until they got cloaking technology, which tipped the scales in battle. To prevent their technology from falling into enemy hands, they self-destructed their ships. But now that Klingons have the cloaking device, it hardly makes sense anymore. Also - where's the honor in tricking your enemy and hiding?
It's one of those things you just have to handwave. After all, if cloaking technology is everywhere, why doesn't everyone use it? Sure, the Federation signed this "treaty", but how come the Cardassians, Dominion, or Borg don't use it?
In TOS, the Romulans were nothing special until they got cloaking technology, which tipped the scales in battle. To prevent their technology from falling into enemy hands, they self-destructed their ships. But now that Klingons have the cloaking device, it hardly makes sense anymore. Also - where's the honor in tricking your enemy and hiding?
It's one of those things you just have to handwave. After all, if cloaking technology is everywhere, why doesn't everyone use it? Sure, the Federation signed this "treaty", but how come the Cardassians, Dominion, or Borg don't use it?
Presumably because the Federation got something from the Romulans in exchange for agreeing not to develop or use cloaks, something worth more to them than cloaking technology.
1) The Romulans had cloaking technology from the first episode of TOS onward and evidently they gave the Earthmen a run for their money during the war.
2) The Federation does have cloaking technology. We saw both cloaking suits and the cloaked holo-ship in Star Trek: Insurrection.
I always figured the power drain/consumption that a cloaking device would take up on a ships' systems made Starfleet realize it wasn't worth it, so they were always like "to heck with it" and didn't pursue the matter, and when drawing up treaties with the Romulans, were like "Yeah, whatever".
It's a better explanation than Gene Roddenberry's "our guys don't go sneaking around", if you ask me.
It's a better explanation than Gene Roddenberry's "our guys don't go sneaking around", if you ask me.
How is a cloaking device in the tiniest way dishonorable? It's the same as camouflage, ECM and crouching behind a rock. All very honorable tactics.
Because they never captured one intact. The Borg are (literally) stumbling boobs, who can't invent things, only assimilate.
I understand that. My point was, cloaking technology was their competitive advantage. With other alien races having it, they're no longer special.
I'd like to think that movie never happened.
I'd like to think that movie never happened.
As much as I love your thinking in regards to Insurrection, I hold tight to the mantra "if it happens on screen, it counts".
I see the Treaty of Algeron as something like the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, of the 189 parties to the treaty, only 5 of the parties "get" to have nukes.
The Romulans had some kind of advantage over the Federation at some point and slid the treaty under the Federation's nose to be signed. Did the Federation get anything at all in return, was there a package deal? We certainly never heard of anything.
The Federation's ability to penetrate the Romulan's cloak is hit and miss. In Unification, the Romulan warship trailing the troop transports was a complete surprise, even though the Enterprise was right on top of it.
Starfleet occasional couldn't detect the Romulans, the Romulans could always detect them.
And it isn't just a matter of the Federation and the Romulans, Starfleet is apparently not allowed to use a cloaking device in confrontation with anyone! The earlier protracted war with the Cardassian might have ended sooner, with fewer causalities on both side, and more advantageous for the Federation, if Starfleet had merely been permitted to employ a cloaking device during combat operations.
Voyager certainly could have used one.
It hard to see the Federation agreeing to a treaty that put them at such a disadvantage, unless they had no real choice in the matter.
It's simple, they could either fight a brutal bloody war to the death with the Romulans or they could agree not to develop cloaking tech (but still develop anti-cloaking countermeasures).
And we don't know what the Romulans gave up in return. They never use that super-powerful plasma torpedo the BOP in Balance of Terror again, maybe they agreed not to further develop THAT tech in exchange.
And we don't know what the Romulans gave up in return. They never use that super-powerful plasma torpedo the BOP in Balance of Terror again, maybe they agreed not to further develop THAT tech in exchange.
Then again it was said in TNG's Face of the Enemy that the Warbird couldn't cross into Federation space without being detected. So there must be pretty powerful sensors of some type that can see a Warbird Crossing the Neutral Zone into Federation space. Perhaps some that can detect the wake of a cloaked ship? There most likely is an arms race of sorts between sensor technology and cloaking technology.
Another take:
The Federation is surrounded by enemies hell-bent on using their military might to subjugate everybody, or destroy those they can't subjugate. The Federation perseveres nevertheless. It thus appears that Starfleet is an utterly dominant military force to begin with, and would not need to cower in front of any adversary.
But that in itself makes the Treaty of Algeron reasonable enough. Take the already nigh-invincible Starfleet and add cloaking devices, and the universe will stand no chance against the ruthless conquistadors of the Federation. Better to perish in hopelessly suicidal wars of Armageddon than to let that happen, then!
So the UFP can choose between having to fight a thousand species in the ultimate struggle of paranoia, and giving up cloaks as a goodwill gesture that really costs them nothing. It's not as if cloaking would really be needed to defeat the wussy Cardassians or Talarians or Tzenkethi, and if refraining from using it saves the UFP from the embarrassment of having to defeat a joint Cardassian-Talarian-Tzenkethi force, let alone from having to ward off genocidal attacks from a desperate Romulan Star Empire...
Timo Saloniemi
The Federation is surrounded by enemies hell-bent on using their military might to subjugate everybody, or destroy those they can't subjugate. The Federation perseveres nevertheless. It thus appears that Starfleet is an utterly dominant military force to begin with, and would not need to cower in front of any adversary.
But that in itself makes the Treaty of Algeron reasonable enough. Take the already nigh-invincible Starfleet and add cloaking devices, and the universe will stand no chance against the ruthless conquistadors of the Federation. Better to perish in hopelessly suicidal wars of Armageddon than to let that happen, then!
So the UFP can choose between having to fight a thousand species in the ultimate struggle of paranoia, and giving up cloaks as a goodwill gesture that really costs them nothing. It's not as if cloaking would really be needed to defeat the wussy Cardassians or Talarians or Tzenkethi, and if refraining from using it saves the UFP from the embarrassment of having to defeat a joint Cardassian-Talarian-Tzenkethi force, let alone from having to ward off genocidal attacks from a desperate Romulan Star Empire...
Timo Saloniemi
I guess it could be that Star Fleet felt as if the military advantage of the cloak could be defeated or mitigated with the Neutral Zone sensor net, and patrols. It also seems that it was more of a cold war situation with the Romulans, as long as the Balance of Power was maintained, nothing was going to happen along the zone. Stealing the newer cloaking device was just to maintain that balance.
-Chris
Three possibilities:
1. The Romulans had the advantage at the time and could dictate the terms of a treaty.
2. The Romulans agreed to give up something equally valuable as a concession that we just don't know about.
3. The Federation negotiators were a bunch of spineless appeasers who wanted peace at any price and agreed to a bad treaty.
1. The Romulans had the advantage at the time and could dictate the terms of a treaty.
2. The Romulans agreed to give up something equally valuable as a concession that we just don't know about.
3. The Federation negotiators were a bunch of spineless appeasers who wanted peace at any price and agreed to a bad treaty.
or 4. The Federation negotiators were under orders to indirectly provoke an attack from the Romulans so that the enemy could be crushed once and for all. Unfortunately, the Romulans turned out to be spineless appeasers who failed to violate the treaty despite the deliberate throat-exposing. 
Timo Saloniemi
Timo Saloniemi
Well in DS9 the season 7 opener with the Romulans and Bajorans facing off was over the Romulans trying to install plasma torpedoes in Bajoran territory without their permission so they may still use them.
or 4. The Federation negotiators were under orders to indirectly provoke an attack from the Romulans so that the enemy could be crushed once and for all. Unfortunately, the Romulans turned out to be spineless appeasers who failed to violate the treaty despite the deliberate throat-exposing.
Timo Saloniemi
mmm... far too Machiavellian for the UFP we've seen, but interesting.
Similar threads
