• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Pattern Of 9 Says Trek XI Will Fail

The Wormhole

Fleet Admiral
Admiral
Star Trek XI will be released in 2009. Let's take a look at other Trek movies released in years that ended in 9. Star Trek The Motion Picture, released in 1979. Though a financial success, it was a critical failure and remains to this day one of the more unpopular Trek movies with very few supporters. Then there's Star Trek V The Final Frontier, released in 1989. A financial and critical failure with even less supporters than TMP. This is the Pattern of 9, any Trek movie released in a year ending with 9 is doomed to fail. Hell, years ending with 9 aren't good for any movie with the word Star in its title. 1999 didn't have a Trek movie. It did however, have a Star Wars movie, Star Wars Episode I The Phantom Menace, which is quite possibly one of least popular Star Wars movies. And what do you know, Star Trek XI will be released in 2009. A year ending with 9. Therefore the Pattern of 9 is establised that Star Trek XI will fail. It has to fail. There's no other way of looking at it.

Also, let's take a moment to abbreviate these years to their last two digits. TMP in 79, TFF in 89, SWTPM in 99, and Trek XI in 09. How fitting that this movie be released in a year that abbreviated begins with a zero, given the love affair with the number zero that Abrams and his cohorts seem to have. I'm looking at the direction of the USS Kelvin's registry.
 
Inane rambling factor: 10

I tend to feel sorry for those nameless persons whose frail grip on reality is loosening based upon one solitary movie.

GO STAR TREK 2009!!
Long live Star Trek!!
 
Inane rambling factor: 10

I tend to feel sorry for those nameless persons whose frail grip on reality is loosening based upon one solitary movie.
Oh, come on. I kinda liked it.

And let's not get into frail grips on reality, shall we? Not even those of nameless persons -- it's just unnecessary.
 
Star Trek XI will be released in 2009. Let's take a look at other Trek movies released in years that ended in 9. Star Trek The Motion Picture, released in 1979. Though a financial success, it was a critical failure and remains to this day one of the more unpopular Trek movies with very few supporters. Then there's Star Trek V The Final Frontier, released in 1989. A financial and critical failure with even less supporters than TMP. This is the Pattern of 9, any Trek movie released in a year ending with 9 is doomed to fail. Hell, years ending with 9 aren't good for any movie with the word Star in its title. 1999 didn't have a Trek movie. It did however, have a Star Wars movie, Star Wars Episode I The Phantom Menace, which is quite possibly one of least popular Star Wars movies. And what do you know, Star Trek XI will be released in 2009. A year ending with 9. Therefore the Pattern of 9 is establised that Star Trek XI will fail. It has to fail. There's no other way of looking at it.

Also, let's take a moment to abbreviate these years to their last two digits. TMP in 79, TFF in 89, SWTPM in 99, and Trek XI in 09. How fitting that this movie be released in a year that abbreviated begins with a zero, given the love affair with the number zero that Abrams and his cohorts seem to have. I'm looking at the direction of the USS Kelvin's registry.

Yeah I came to this conclusion too after reading some pig entrails.

RAMA:rolleyes:
 
Since past performance is apparently a solid indicator of future performance, I've decided to crunch some numbers.

Star Trek (2009) will be the fourth Trek film released during the summer. I took the combined domestic gross of the previous three releases (TWOK, TSFS, and TFF) and divided them by their combined production budget. I calculated the average rate of return on a summer Trek movie to be 3.72. With an estimated production budget of $150 million, the summer ROR pattern indicates the new movie will gross over $550 million in the US.
 
More like the pattern of NEIN!

But thanks for playing. We'll send you a copy of the board game and a year's supply of Sombrero-Roni. :techman:
 
You know, now that I think about it....Could this be The Pattern that Abrams talks about in Fringe ?

Could there be a connection between Fringe and Trek XI ? :eek::eek:
 
1999 didn't have a Trek movie. It did however, have a Star Wars movie, Star Wars Episode I The Phantom Menace, which is quite possibly one of least popular Star Wars movies.

If I liked it, does that mean I will like the new Trek movie? :) (Hey, all kidding aside, I thought I read that Phantom Menace put up really good box office. Did it really not fare as well as the others??)
 
Wait a minute.
Nemesis released in 2002 was the worst box office.

Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home had the best box office - $109,713,132
 
1999 didn't have a Trek movie. It did however, have a Star Wars movie, Star Wars Episode I The Phantom Menace, which is quite possibly one of least popular Star Wars movies.

If I liked it, does that mean I will like the new Trek movie? :) (Hey, all kidding aside, I thought I read that Phantom Menace put up really good box office. Did it really not fare as well as the others??)


It did okay at the box office, I guess, but Phantom Menace was not a critical success by any definition of the word.
 
Wait a minute.
Nemesis released in 2002 was the worst box office.

Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home had the best box office - $109,713,132
You are right about Nemesis having the worst box office however when we are comparing box office records, we need to look at worldwide gross and not just in the U.S like you did.
You are semi right that TVH made most money in U.S. market(unadjusted for inflation) but if we look at worldwide gross. It is actually Star Trek: The Motion Picture who did the best, grossing $139,000,000 worldwide. Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home made little less circa $133,000,000 worldwide.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top