My main problems were with the beginning and end. First off, why does Fry not know about Parade Day? He's been living in the 31st century for over a decade now. The "other characters explain an odd future custom to Fry" trope is outdated. (Although I suppose it's possible that Fry has always happened to be off-planet or in terrible danger every time Parade Day rolled around.) And second, the very ending was weak, just kind of fizzling out in the last moments. And yeah, Bender kinda got out of death way too easily.
And that's part of the problem. I don't like it when they make Fry too stupid. It's sacrificing characterization depth for a cheap joke. It's the same problem that's befallen Homer Simpson and reduced him to a caricature of himself.
And it doesn't address what I said already -- that if it were just Fry being so amazingly stupid that he didn't remember such a thing as Parade Day when he'd seen the parade go by right outside the building for ten years running, then surely Bender or Leela or the Professor or Hermes would've responded to his stupidity with anger or impatience, rather than just taking his ignorance in stride and answering the question. This is not exactly a group known for its polite restraint. It's the reactions of the other characters that make the exchange feel like something that belongs nine or ten years earlier in continuity, at a time when the people around Fry would've expected him to be unfamiliar with their customs and in need of explanations.
I am quite forgiving to continuity when it comes to cartoons though.
I am quite forgiving to continuity when it comes to cartoons though.
Well, it depends on the cartoon and the precedent it's set. If it's something like The Simpsons, you don't expect continuity. But Futurama, while still being loose about it, has generally managed to acknowledge the passage of time and allow its characters to grow, and that's one of the things that's given the show its own identity and character. So I don't like it when they fail to live up to that (like when they did a movie that was explicitly set in 3008 or '09 but still had Cubert and Dwight the same preadolescent age they'd been in episodes set 5 or 6 years earlier).
Classic Simpsons had just as good continuity as Futurama.
Futurama does generally have more continuity than some other cartoons that just ignore all history for the sake of humour (such as Family Guy), but it's never been perfect either.
They've had plenty of minor continuity issues, even in the pre-cancellation episodes.
And I'm sure they've probably had similar issues as this episode where Fry should have been aware of something in the future, but wasn't. Surely not as bad as missing an annual parade right outside their window for over a decade, of course, but it's not without precedent either.
They have tried to keep it consistent, but when it gets in the way of a good joke or episode, they have ignored it for the sake of entertainment.
At this point, I'm chalking a lot of Fry's stupidity up to "freezer burn." Niven, Pournelle, and Barnes posited it in The Legacy of Heorot -- the colonists who were frozen for the time it took to reach their new home planet suffered some minor neurological damage from the time spent in cold sleep. Fry spent a millennium in cold sleep. His brain has some "freezer burn," and that manifests as a kind of dementia, not unlike the kind brought on by minor strokes. Fry's probably not aware of his neurological problems -- for all we know, he's experienced the parade multiple times, only it's yet to register because of his condition -- but it's also not something he can overcome because the degenerative damage has been done.Just because an oversight has happened before, that doesn't make it all right to do it again. One should always strive to do better. And as I said, it's less acceptable at this point, when Fry has been in the future for over a decade, than in the original series when it had only been 1-4 years.
I thought this week's episode was pretty good. I liked all of the parodies/references, and it was solid throughout.
And was I the only person who actually put on 3D glasses?I guess it says a lot that I actually had 3D glasses within reach of me, but I was disappointed that it didn't look very good.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.