remember the famous motto
are we alone in the universe
are we alone in the universe
up!"
I don't see how the branches of time being the same follow from the existence of alternate universes.If alternate (parallel) universes exist, then the same branches of time must already exist in every universe. We just choose different branches to follow.
Please elaborate on this conditional argument. If branches of time exist, then why does it follow that their outcomes already exist?If these branches do exist, then the consequences of choosing that specific branch must already exist.
I can certainly agree with that. Even if the only decision we can make is to be "asleep" to our movement through the universe (our pre-laid rollercoaster ride through existence) or to be awake for the ride, that is still a non-deterministic universe, regardless of our inability to jump the tracks.This is not pre-determinism, because WE choose the branches of decisions.
I'm not getting the connections, not that I disagree, I just can't understand the logic. I'm afraid I needed more.Therefore all time must exist simultaneously.
Every moment in time (past, present and future) all exist at the same time.
If alternate (parallel) universes exist, then the same branches of time must already exist in every universe. We just choose different branches to follow.
If these branches do exist, then the consequences of choosing that specific branch must already exist.
This is not pre-determinism, because WE choose the branches of decisions.
Therefore all time must exist simultaneously.
Every moment in time (past, present and future) all exist at the same time.
Also, if we liken alternate universes to space bubbles, then they would have to be separated by a distance to keep them from interfering with each other? Then wouldn’t the distance between them be Subspace? Literally the space between space.
Just a theory.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.