• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Nature of the Universe, Time Travel and More...

  • Thread starter Will The Serious
  • Start date
I certainly have noticed how cars are all looking the same.

On the boat design network, the question was asked what the next ten years in boat design would look like. I commented on the increasing abilities of AI, and that coupling the power of instant custom designs and automated manufacturing, we were likely to start seeing all kinds of wild designs, when the architect's experience and influence were removed from the process. I was yelled at for potentially endangering people's lives with my comments. Essentially, they said, "Shut the :censored: up!"

I didn't realize naval architects were so sensitive.

-Will
 
If alternate (parallel) universes exist, then the same branches of time must already exist in every universe. We just choose different branches to follow.

If these branches do exist, then the consequences of choosing that specific branch must already exist.

This is not pre-determinism, because WE choose the branches of decisions.

Therefore all time must exist simultaneously.
Every moment in time (past, present and future) all exist at the same time.

Also, if we liken alternate universes to space bubbles, then they would have to be separated by a distance to keep them from interfering with each other? Then wouldn’t the distance between them be Subspace? Literally the space between space.
Just a theory. ;)
 
I like the way you think, but I don't quite follow.
If alternate (parallel) universes exist, then the same branches of time must already exist in every universe. We just choose different branches to follow.
I don't see how the branches of time being the same follow from the existence of alternate universes.

If these branches do exist, then the consequences of choosing that specific branch must already exist.
Please elaborate on this conditional argument. If branches of time exist, then why does it follow that their outcomes already exist?

This is not pre-determinism, because WE choose the branches of decisions.
I can certainly agree with that. Even if the only decision we can make is to be "asleep" to our movement through the universe (our pre-laid rollercoaster ride through existence) or to be awake for the ride, that is still a non-deterministic universe, regardless of our inability to jump the tracks.

Therefore all time must exist simultaneously.
Every moment in time (past, present and future) all exist at the same time.
I'm not getting the connections, not that I disagree, I just can't understand the logic. I'm afraid I needed more.

-Will
 
If alternate (parallel) universes exist, then the same branches of time must already exist in every universe. We just choose different branches to follow.

If these branches do exist, then the consequences of choosing that specific branch must already exist.

This is not pre-determinism, because WE choose the branches of decisions.

Therefore all time must exist simultaneously.
Every moment in time (past, present and future) all exist at the same time.

Also, if we liken alternate universes to space bubbles, then they would have to be separated by a distance to keep them from interfering with each other? Then wouldn’t the distance between them be Subspace? Literally the space between space.
Just a theory. ;)

here is a i guess theory lol lol

what if every single dream we have had since we were on earth when we all sleep are the unlimited infinity alternate earths in the multiverse

and or what if every single thing we think of in my minds about anything and everything since we were put on earth are also the unlimited infinty alternate earths in the multiverse
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top