• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Nature of the Universe, Time Travel and More...

i still wonder if the time travel theory from back to the future is true

a flux compassator and 1 21 jiggawats of electricity is what makes time travel
 
In this scenario, wouldn't it be incorrect to call it artificial? I mean, considering this nascent intelligence is fundamental to the Universe.

-Will
You are correct but in my view if that was the case we can't detect or know of this presence so we think we are creating something artificial via code. We don't know that we are being influenced by an external force to create the physical form that it wants.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Amazing that something like this made to make boom can also be used to help your heart. Ignore the title of the video it's a bit click baity but it's really interesting.

The pills are very small of course.
Reactors on the internet think Father Merrin (THE EXORCIST) had a tin of mints.

The Moon may have been hit:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

This can be simulated, however:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Pole flip of Earth

Photo contest

Not so standard candles

Robot
 
Last edited:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Apparently new data regarding the Expansion of the Universe, shows that the Universe's Expansion isn't accelerating according to Newer Scientific Data.
This conflicts with a older 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics Winner's hypothesis that the Expansion of the Universe is accelerating & introduced Dark Matter as one of the reasonings.
It seems that data proves that there WAS a acceleration to the speed of the Expansion of the Universe in the past.
But now it's mostly petered out and flat-lined so far & even has a ever so slight rate of deceleration to the Rate of Universe Expansion.
We won't know if the deceleration to the Rate of Universe Expansion will increase moving foreward or stay at it's slight down-ward slope, that will require more time to tell and figure out.

Those are some interesting findings IMO, that should generally change many findings & conclusions, especially about Dark Matter & Dark Energy's relevance to the cosmos and how it affected Universe Expansion rates.
 
Last edited:
I never did buy into the whole supernova-as-standard-camera deal.

Humans built nukes from the Davy Crockett up to the Czar Bomb.

Exploding stars likely have variable yields as well:

Not the band-

We all remember this:

Guess what

One of the arguments tech-brahs make to justify clogging LEO with megaconstellations that make amateur NEO hunting difficult) is how telescopes need to be put in space. But space science is being cut by Russell Vought types, while private launches increase.

Speaking of big space telescopes

Goddard and Marshall pushed for these.

Guess which two NASA Centers NewSpace/Vought types in the current administration want to kill?
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top