• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The King Kong Extended Edition 3 Disk set

Flying Spaghetti Monster

Vice Admiral
Admiral
What do you all think? I found a brand new copy for 5 bucks. I'm of two minds of the film in general. 1) It's exactly what I expected.. a long adventure with all kinds of action, that I knew exactly what would happen and am along for the ride. and 2) It's PJ's vanity project, not only bloated but really not worth it.

The three disk set is cool though. His commentary is always insightful. My favorite aspect is to see the deleted scenes that are unfinished... a look at the strange greenscreen sets.
 
I defend this movie from time to time...but it really is too long. I don't know crap about making movies, but I really wonder when directors make 4 or 5 hours of movie...they do know what 2 hours is don't they? I mean...they've gone way beyong a good running time for a movie about a giant gorilla, do you need to see them swat giant mosquitoes for 4 minutes? Doesn't everyone know that people don't want to wait any more than 30 minutes to see the main attraction?
 
It's a high adventure movie that I wish they made more of. Just the visit to Skull Island alone would have made a good movie without the New York climax. However I would have trimmed A LOT of the begaining of the movie in New York. Like the whole scene with the invetors could have been shortened considerably.
 
No movie about a giant monkey should ever be 3 hours.

Also, I found the relationship between the girl and Kong to be too sweet. I was worried I was about to see the most inappropriate sex scene of all time. I preferred how in the original, she liked Kong the way a person might like their cat but she was still scared of him.

There is some cool stuff in the movie though. But I just skip to those scenes when I pop in the DVD.
 
An Extended Edition!?!

Oh, God...pure torture.

King Kong, The Phantom Menace, The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, Spider-Man 3...even the masters can make really, really shitty movies.
 
An Extended Edition!?!

Oh, God...pure torture.

No kidding. The original might have been a decent movie had they edited it back to about 80 minutes or so. That's pretty much the length that the story deserves.

Plus I kept expecting Kyle Gass to wander into various scenes with his guitar.
 
Curious:

Which of those "vanity projects" do you own on DVD?

Just one.

Me, too. ;)

LOL--Me too!

A longer movie? Really, what this film needs is a "shortened" version rather than a longer one. Wouldn't it be nice to have an edited down version of some of these films.

When I was watching Kong the first time, I cared more about what happened in New York at the start of the movie than anything that was going on by the time they got to the island. Jackson, it seemed, wanted to make too different movies and perhaps should have done so. A King Kong movie, and then a companion piece about New York in the 30's.
 
King Kong Extended was a better film than the theatrical cut, it had a lot more monster action in it. I enjoyed the movie, but it's absolutely WAY too long. The first half of the movie is just ridiculously slow; the worst offender of all is all the screentime devoted to the relationship between Jimmy the annoying kid and the XO who mentors him; WHO CARES?

It would have made a brilliant 2 hour movie; cut out the endless character scenes and put in the extra monster scenes.

It's a shame he didn't make this before LOTR. If you go through all the bonus features you get a good sense of the original movie, it would have been a leaner action movie akin to the Mummy.

Adrian Brody's character was a heroic explorer instead of an actor searching for Skull Island. The movie opened with them searching for a map to its location in some country, action scene ensues. And it obviously would have been shorter!

I love every single bloated second of the LOTR movies, but that's because its my favorite book of all time. They earned the right to be 3.5 hour movies. But King Kong? The characters don't deserve so much attention.
 
I like the Extedented Edition. I don't care that it's longer than necessary.
if i want to watch it, I make sure I have enough time for it.
If the execution is good, and in this case it is, I have no problems to watch all these little side stories as well as the main story.
It's a little like reading a book.
What happens when you cut a story down to it's essentials you can see in the Potter movies. Those are very enjoyable movies, but most fans miss the side stories that expand the universe significantly.
If you care only about monkey action watch the theatrical cut or fast forward to the "good parts".
Me, I have the time to enjoy everything about it.
 
I loved it. The extra scenes made it that much better. Its still a tad long, and I still prefer the original in places, but overall I loved the original cut, and the extended is even better.

I especially loved the ceretopsian and water creature sequences - nice nods to the original.
 
Well, this was five dollars and well worth it. The new creatures in the film were worth it. But hwat makes this film worth it is the endless behind the scenes stuff. It's almost as if the LOTR special editions were the story of Peter Jackson and company and what they are doing and how they make films and the KK EE is just a continuation from those disks. You get to see the the origins of the project preLOTR and then the development using post LOTR tech. It's almost liek you can watch the behind the scenes stuff of the LOTR films and this one in sequence.

I got a little emotional in the feature with the first visit to NY. I liked the scenes about visiting the ESB but also the scenes where they meet Fay Wray. When they report her dying it's genuinely emotional for Jackson. If it was me doing the documentaries, I would have added one thing to that part, something I remember seeing when I was in NY when Fay Wray died, that, at night, they lit the ESB a bit differently in tribute to her. I think a shot of that would have been a good button to end that part of the documentary.

The documentaries here are of the same quality of the LOTR ones, and its interesting to see how they did it. Most interesting is their duplication of NYC in NZ... and how they used LOTR's MASSIVE technology to make crowds and cars, and how they wrote a NEW program to create the buildings in the city..

What is so interesting for me is that I like the movie but I don't think it entirely succeeds... Kong after a while looks too animated, too obviously CGI. but he still looks good (odd, with LOTR, WETA trounced ILM in creating effects...LOTR vs TPM.. but then with Transformers, ILM trounced WETA... Optimus Prime vs KK) but I enjoy watching commentaries for films that are not perfect.

I like comment in there that KK is a truely cinematic story, told only in film and the epitome of that medium in its different eras, and, though a sound story, is not based on any particular book.

I still don't quite know if I know the allure that this story is to Jackson, though he does go into a lot of depth on that. But I think I understand why he made it, what the allure is, in one particular shot that really almost sells me on the whole project. It's my favorite shot of the film, from the music to the look of it, to the fact that you know wht's going to happen next, but in a good way, because its like aforeboding, like you've come this far and destiny is unavoidable. The shot I'm talking about has Kong racing first climbing the ESB and the camera starts in close and eventually pans out almost a mile to show the majestic building being lit by spotlights. The music in the film is lit by spotlights. It's beautiful.



The film is an odd thing: the story is exactly the same as the old version, but longer. One of the reasons that it is so much longer is that they wanted to have the same things happen in it but not ahve the reason for these things happen be so clear cut. Denham knows of the island but he doesn't know what's there, whereas in the original he knows what's there and where to find it (which isn't dramatic). There are many moments like that, things that they decided to make a little more gray for this film.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top