Are there any particular "inclusive," "PC," or "high-brow" candidates that should have been nominated this year that weren't? Because those authors would be the actual aggrieved parties. The discussion should be about which quality works are being unfairly excluded and their various merits.
Otherwise, the argument seems to boil down to: "Blah, blah, blah. All conservatives are evil, racist homophobes."
Otherwise, the argument seems to boil down to: "Blah, blah, blah. All conservatives are evil, racist homophobes."
