The Holy Trinity of Science Fiction - Round 2

[Mal]

Star Trek, The Foundation Series (Asimov), and...???

In our first round, we started with 64 candidates. This round, we move forward with only 13.

There have been debates on whether we should stick with just authors, with books, with movies. Whether a trinity should be pure, or have one from each. Whether money matters (answer: always ).

I cannot give you all the answers. Only options.

Please pick three from the list above to include in your holy trinity. The top vote-getters will move forward to our next round.

 

[nx1701g]

Um where's the list?

 

[Mal]

Um where's the list?

what list?

 

[nx1701g]

^ Misread. I think I clicked on the list before you had the poll up.

Sorry everyone.

 

[Australis]

Lensman series should still be on that list. Seriously.

However, this time I went with 2001 (shaped post-60s SF cinema and general 'look')

Dr Who (shaped SF storytelling, and if it's good enough for Harlan it's good enough for me)

Neuromancer (at the dawn of cyberopunk and a big influence on the net we use today.)

 

[Admiral_Young]

Doctor Who, Star Trek, and Dune to the third round we go!

 

[Pemmer Harge]

Dune again. Doctor Who, because it's British! And Babylon 5 because Star Trek really doesn't need my vote. I still think The Left Hand of Darkness is better than Star Wars, though, way better!

 

[Roshi]

HG Wells, Star Trek and The Twilight Zone. Though it would have been cool if you had separated the authors from their works.

 

[Starkers]

Star Trek, HG Wells and Dr Who.

 

[Mysterion]

Asimov, Clarke, and Heinlein.

 

[EEE]

Heinlein, Asimov & Trek... they got me hooked into a lifetime love of SciFi.

 

[Temis the Vorta]

Same three as before...

 

[Mal]

this round is done. head over here now.