• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Hobbit: Battle of the Five Armies Grade/Discuss (Spoilers)

Grade The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies

  • A+

    Votes: 12 15.6%
  • A

    Votes: 14 18.2%
  • A-

    Votes: 13 16.9%
  • B+

    Votes: 2 2.6%
  • B

    Votes: 9 11.7%
  • B-

    Votes: 6 7.8%
  • C+

    Votes: 8 10.4%
  • C

    Votes: 6 7.8%
  • C-

    Votes: 3 3.9%
  • D+

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • D

    Votes: 2 2.6%
  • D-

    Votes: 1 1.3%
  • F

    Votes: 1 1.3%

  • Total voters
    77
  • Poll closed .
I think Lee Pace's ability to disappear into his characters is pretty awesome. Not a lot of actors can do that, and he's got a pretty distinctive face and voice which makes it even more impressive.
 
Meh, least favorite of the trilogy. Actually, least favorite of the six.

The Fellowship of the Ring - A
The Two Towers - B+
The Return of the King - A

An Unexpected Journey - B+
The Desolation of Smaug - A
The Battle of the Five Armies - C+

Smaug's destruction of Laketown was awesome, but his monologuing and take down by Bard were eyeroll-inducing and the whole thing would have been better as the climax to DoS. Christ, five minutes after a dragon older than shit shows up and napalms the town, he's dead and everyone has moved on to become peasant superheroes who can stand against 9 foot tall, platemail-armored orc warriors with just their shoddy farm implements, dirty rags and the power of heart. Lame.

I suppose it's better than when Saruman didn't even show up to be dealt with, but not by much.

Alfrid should have vanished from the movie after the confrontation on the beach. End of story. He was worthless, and NOT funny at all (my theatre was dead silent during his scenes).

Character motivations really fell flat by this third film, too. We go from the original trilogy where it's the end of an Age and everyone is fighting and dying with the fate of the entire world in contention...to the film where everyone is fighting for some gold, or a necklace, or bauble, or vague strategic objects, or really because the script said it was time to fight.

The Elves show up with an army because...some ancestor left a necklace in the treasure trove and...mumble, mumble, mumble, suddenly elves are all about throwing their lives away for trinkets that get one three second establishing shot and then are never mentioned again? Yeah OK, that's believable. The great stag or moose or whatever the fuck the elf king rode in on was ridiculous, too. People (myself included) laughed out loud when he rode up. The character/actor are cool, but his mount was dumb.

The humans, who just got buttfucked on national tv by a dragon, suddenly think yeah, we should totally storm this dwarven fortress because 5 seconds of negotiations broke down. Form ranks everyone and join the battle line!

Two armies of orcs show up, one using giant sandworms taken straight from Dune to sneak up to the fortress and surprise everyone...when they could have just come out INSIDE the fortress and won immediately, or wait ten minutes and let the elves and dwarves slaughter eachotehr and before moving in for the kill. Then the worms just vanish, because why would you want to use these creatures you can clearly control and which are each as big as Smaug himself to undermine the battlefield and easily annihilate the dwarves and elves?

Sauron wants the fortress as a strategic base of operations? Um, what? Since when? So he doesn't want the treasure? He wants the entire mountain which is never again mentioned in the LotR trilogy because: strategery?

Ignoring all of that, the movie just looked awful. Post Smaug burning Laketown, everything looked plastic like a poorly rendered videogame cutscene. The armies were straight out of George Lucas's playbook - green screen everything! CGI orcs! CGI dwarves! CGI elves! Make smaller versions of the trolls with more human-like features, tiny hands, and big heads! Why not?

Let's remove all tension from the 90 minute battle by having huge, armored trolls show up and then all somehow get one-shot, at the same time, by dwarven arrows, just as the dozen or so dwarven adventurers (who had removed their armor) come charging out of the fortress to help...because? The dwarven army they reinforced was shown to have NO ARCHERS, just ranks of pikemen and shield bearers! Who fired those arrows? It wasn't the elves, they were elsewhere on the battlefield...also not using their bows and instead charging in Leeroy Jenkin's style. Trolls, which in the LotR films are hard as hell to stop with arrow fire, even when Legolas gets involved, and are now wearing full plate armor, get taken out instantly in a wide shot as background action. Sigh. Whatever.

Maybe Billy Connelly could headbutt a few dozen more orcs and hop around like a freak, because what the battle needed is more comic relief. Old women and children taking out hardened orc warriors with ease? Yes! Thank you, please! All that's missing is a man in drag...wait a minute, you have that too?! Perfect!

There's so many things that just struck me as foolish, non-sensical, or pointless in this film, I could go on for pages...but I won't.

I'll leave off by admitting I actually found myself missing the overly-long endings from Return of the King after we got a single Bilbo says, "Later!" to the surviving dwarves and then goes home to find his things being auctioned off in the Shire, THE END. They went from too many endings to almost none at all.
 
<<
Two armies of orcs show up, one using giant sandworms taken straight from Dune to sneak up to the fortress and surprise everyone...when they could have just come out INSIDE the fortress and won immediately, or wait ten minutes and let the elves and dwarves slaughter eachotehr and before moving in for the kill. Then the worms just vanish, because why would you want to use these creatures you can clearly control and which are each as big as Smaug himself to undermine the battlefield and easily annihilate the dwarves and elves?>>

That is an interesting point. I can only assume they can only eat through "soft" rock and not through the hardened rock of the Lonely Mountain. Also, the point of Azog's attack was to tie down the allied armies until Bolg showed up. They were less concerned with taking the Mountain (which at that point was only held by a dozen Dwarves) than with eliminating these allied armies so that they don't exist for Sauron's true move in LOTR.
 
All of my problems with this movie are encapsulated in the moment where Azog (or whoever) captures confronts Thorin and co., and executes one of them in front of all the rest, where my immediate thought was: "Oh no, not...that guy. I don't remember his name or anything he's said or done up to now."

This is doubly reinforced when all the dwarves show up at the end to say goodbye to Bilbo and I remembered that most of them hadn't said a damn thing the whole movie, and I couldn't assign any names to faces for them either.

Same here, just seen it and I though it was a mess - what on Earth was the point of jamming in Alfrid as yet another filler character.
 
Is it wrong that I haven't been able to generate the enthusiasm to go see this yet?

I might try tomorrow. Guess I should ask the same question as last year--Would anybody be able to recommend a particularly good point somewhere near the middle of the film for taking a potty break should the need arise?
 
Is it wrong that I haven't been able to generate the enthusiasm to go see this yet?

I might try tomorrow. Guess I should ask the same question as last year--Would anybody be able to recommend a particularly good point somewhere near the middle of the film for taking a potty break should the need arise?
No need to worry it's much shorter than the other ones
 
Honestly, the movie seemed way to long to me. They never should have broken such a short book into three movies.
 
Is it wrong that I haven't been able to generate the enthusiasm to go see this yet?

I might try tomorrow. Guess I should ask the same question as last year--Would anybody be able to recommend a particularly good point somewhere near the middle of the film for taking a potty break should the need arise?

At the theatre we went to, they advertised an app called "RunPee" or maybe "PeeRun" which would give you potty break info for different movies. I kid you not.
 
Who are all these people who can't sit 90-120 minutes without urinating? :wtf: I remember back in high school I only went to the restroom two times in four years!
 
Alfrid was there for comic relief. The movie is relentlessly dark otherwise.

The problem is he did not necessarily need to be there at all, the Dwarves (especially James Nesbit's character whoever that was, I can never keep all the dwarves straight) are comedic elements in the films.
 
The Dwarves were dealing with their King going insane with dragon sickness. Not really the time for them to be doing pratfalls...
 
I saw it in 3D IMAX, and normally even a really mediocre movie is still totally worth watching in 3D IMAX, but I have to say, I was kind of ready for it to be over by the end.

Honestly, I kind of wish they never made movies out of either the Hobbit or the Lord of the Rings. Some of the movies were pretty good, but the books are just so amazing that I kind of think they should have left it as is. The way Middle Earth was to me in my head before I saw the movies was cooler than the way it was in the movies and now I can't help but picturing it more like it is in the movies.
 
What use was Gandalf in this? He stirred up the dwarves to go back to the old mountain and then didn't do much to help the situations he put in motion.
 
What use was Gandalf in this? He stirred up the dwarves to go back to the old mountain and then didn't do much to help the situations he put in motion.

Wans't the whole point of gettinfg the dwarves back in there to prevent darker forces to gain a beachhead there and Smaug becoming an ally of sorts?
gandalf didn't know which dark force was stirring, but he is usually right when having a hunch like that and more often than not it's even worse, so he acted accordingly.
Once the dwarves were in there he couldn't do much else than kick some orc ass and hope fo the best.
That and get the elves and men to the table with the dwarves of course which he admittedly failed because of their stubborness,
 
Yup, the whole situation was to deny Sauron the use of Smaug as a weapon or ally. Whether the Dwarves or Bilbe survived it was entirely secondary as long as Smaug died.

Say what you will about that Dragon, he was honest, they where all being used.
 
I thought I'd copy and paste my review from elsewhere just for fun or something.


So it starts with Smaug attacking Lake Town. I liked that it didn't start with another 8 minute flashback/prologue going over stuff we've already seen. The problem is that Smaug is dead within about ten minutes so it just makes you think "wait, why didn't they put this at the end of the last movie?" There certainly would have been time if they'd cut some of the pointless stuff from DoS (and there was a lot of it!)

The four dwarves that stayed behind don't do anything at all in the Smaug attack so having them stay behind was pointless (they get back to Erebor pretty quickly here.) Tauriel doesn't do anything but say "leave them behind!" every time someone gets left behind.

Bard escapes because for some reason there was a rope in his jail cell and Stephen Fry's neck is stronger than iron bars(!?) No one else tries to fight Smaug but him. The visual of Smaug dying is impressive.

Legolas is just standing on the shore after Smaug dies. I honestly can't remember what he was doing at the end of the last movie but I assume he wasn't just standing there watching people die.

Okay so the start was fairly spectacular, but the problem is where do you go from here? Because it turns out there isn't actually very much plot left at all. This is of course a result of diving the book into three movies and after Smaug is dead there's nothing left to happen but the battle of five armies. So we get stage setting for that. A lot of stage setting. And it isn't really all that interesting? I mean once you've seen a dragon die, discussions on the fair distibution of gold aren't very thrilling.

One of the ways the movie pads things out is by having Thorin do everything in slow motion. He starts talking in an EVIL VOICE just so that you get that he's evil now. In slow motion. He has a weird dream where he's supposed to be sinking into gold but it looks like Cadbury's Caramel advert. In slow motion. He decides to be good again after about four different characters give him the same "you have to be good again!" speech and walks in front of a sunrise. In slow motion.

Then there's the Sauron stuff which after two movies of build-up is done in one scene here. It's undeniably cool seeing Galadriel, Elrond and Saruman fighting the Nazgul...then Galadriel turns into the girl from The Ring to scare away Sauron. The one thing in Fellowship Of The Ring people complained about and they bring it back. Then Saruman says his "leave Sauron to me!" line from the trailer and in the trailer I thought that meant we'd see Saruman fight Sauron or meet with him...but no that's the end of the subplot. If I hadn't seen LOTR I would be wondering what the point of this was (and I have seen LOTR and I'm still wondering what the point of half of it was.)

Alfrid - Okay WTF were they thinking giving him so many scenes? I mean the I know the reason, I can just imagine Peter Jackson saying "he wasn't supposed to be in it so much but we liked the actor so we kept giving him stuff to do *chuckle chuckle*" on the commentary. They just repeat the same thing again and again by having characters idiotically trusting him to do something important and then he fails to do it. Why would they even trust him for a second? It would be like Eomer going up to Wormtongue and saying "okay I want you to look after Eowyn for me BUT DON'T PERV ON HER." Then the pay-off to all this is...Bard just lets him go. The greedy murdering coward who threatend to hit women and was happy to watch children die gets an "aww shucks, it's Alfrid!" ending. Hardly sticking to the spirt of the book, is it? And it's also Bard's last line in the movie which is completely bizarre. I actually like the actor as King Louis in The Musketeers so this is all on Peter Jackson.

Bilbo actually does something (meaning they stick to the book) when he steals the Arkenstone and manages to stop the elves attacking. It's probably the only useful thing he does in the movie.

Billy Connolly shows up and his voice is quite amusing. I really couldn't tell if he was CGI or it was a different actor playing his body. I think what must have happened is he filmed all his scenes three or four years ago (I remember him talking about the make-up in interviews so he definitely filmed some stuff) but they needed him back for reshoots and he was available because he's been ill. So they just drew over him with CGI in all his scenes for consistency? It looks weird. He kills orcs that are wearing helmets by headbutting them and it makes no sense.

The orcs have WERE WORMS and they use them to dig tunnels then we never see them again.

The battle starts off pretty good with the part where the elves jump over the dwarves. Then there's a lot of (too much) fighting in Dale (which I don't think happened in the book?) and Bard has to save James Nesbitt's daughters again because we haven't heard "Da" enough yet.

Then we end up with Thorin, Bilbo, Legols, Tauriel going off to fight boss battles in the snow stage with the CGI orcs. I don't mind giving Bilbo more to do in the battle because the more Bilbo the better, but he doesn't actually do anything useful. There were times in the final fight where I honestly ccouldn't tell which one was Bolg, which one was Azog and which were just lookalike orcs (there was a bit where Legolas threw Orcrist through an orc's head and I thought "oh, Bolg's dead" but then he was fighting Bolg again a minute later.) The problem with ending with one on one fights is that it makes the rest of the battle (which we've cut away from for a long time now) look pointless. Especially since...

The eagles show up and just wash over a load of orcs and it's almost like the ghost army just deleting all the orcs from Minas Tirith. Peter Jackson isn't good at ending big battle scenes. At no point do we even hear that the battle is ended. I guess we're just supposed to assume the eagles killed all the bad guys offscreen. Beorn shows up for a few seconds, which is pathetic. If you're going to introduce a guy that can transform into a bear at least have him fucking do something cool. Radagast also joins the final battle because...Radagat is a killer now? We don't see him doing anything anwyway. We don't even see the bats (BRED FOR WAR) and the eagles fighting each other!

Tauriel - It's funny that when the character was first announced everyone making the movie said she wouldn't just end up being a love interest or a damsel in distree when that's literally all she was here. She spoke to Kili for about five minutes in total over the two movies and we're supposed to think it's REAL LOVE because she cries when he dies? Enough to convince Thranduil to turn face AGAIN? (He already turned face once when he aided the dwarves during the battle but then he turned heel by threatening to leave agian for no reason.)

Legolas - Legolas and Tauriel travel all the way to Angamar which is I think hundreds or thousands of miles away just to look at some bats. At least it means Legolas isn't involved in the fighting as much as he could have been. A bat gives him a lift to the ice stage for some reason. He steers a troll by using his sword like a joystick in its neck. I don't actually mind the running on falling rocks as much as some people did because Elves are supposed to be light on their feet, but it looks kind of fake and silly. Thne there's the "GO FIND ARAGORN BUT I WON'T TELL YOU HIS NAME FOR SOME REASON" bit. Are they trying to set up a "Legoas and Aragorn!" spin-off series, but without Viggo because he hated these movies and would never return?

It's weird how the movie feels simultaneously too dragged out but also too rushed. We don't really get proper resolutions to several of the stories. We don't find out what happens to the Arkenstone after it being built up to be a big deal in all three movies. We don't find out who the new King Under The Mountain is (it's Dain by the way) after it being the reason the dwarves were doing all this for the last three movies. We don't find out what happens to the Lake Town people or if Bard becomes their new King (he does.) I KNOW some will say "DON'T WORRY HE'LL FIX THIS IN THE EXTENDED EDITION" but the EE shouldn't be there to "fix" things. We should see all the character and storyline resolutions in the actual movie. The EE should be for stuff like the Alfrid scenes that are fun but non-essential (except good stuff instead.)

Bombur still doesn't get a line. I thought after three movies of silence they were building to something but I guess not. James Nesbitt only gets about one line which is weird since he was presented as being semi-impotant in the previous two movies. Thorin kind of says the lines from the book to Bilbo when he dies so it's a nice scene but it's changed a bit and Gandalf kind of says the final lines from the book to Bilbo but the context is different so they don't really make sense?

There's a weird bit where Gandalf plays with his pipe for a minute while Bilbo just sits there.

The book ends with Balin and Gandalf visiting Bilbo and giving him a recap on everything that's happened since and I really think the movie could have used that to give more of a sense of closure but instead it ends with a "LOTR prequel!" moment.

Billy Boyd is a good singer.

TL;DR: making The Hobbit into three movies was a bad idea.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top