And nobody thinks about the poor turtle that has to carry the earth around.
Watch the video by CoolHardLogic I posted earlier.Even if earth was flat you can't say it's flat. What about mountains and canyons and oceans. Maybe they don't think space is real but how about air and the sky that it fills up? Also how do they explain the sun?
Jason
I somehow feel like you missed my point, as you seem to be trying to disagree by saying the same thing I was saying. Which is fine. We're both geniuses, and I declare victory.They would argue it was all a hoax like the moon landings. Why give nutters more publicity anyway?
Monsters are usually the things that are most likely to kill and/or eat you. So there are any number of sea creatures that could be considered sea monsters. Add in a bit of embellishment or panic-borne exaggeration, get the story told by numerous people who add in their own refinements, and that's how the stories get passed along.Please tell me though that sailors at least believed sea monsters were real. Be nice if one myth was true.
True.^No, auntiehill is absolutely correct about this. Cats just do things like that. There are some places in my apartment where I never put anything above floor level. It's just going to end up there anyway.
I came across this article the other day, discussing why Trump's supporters don't care that he lies:
https://blogs.scientificamerican.co...ence-of-blue-lies-may-explain-trumps-support/
The idea is that there's something called "blue lies" -- somewhere between white lies, which are told to help others ("My, what a... lovely tie!") and "black" lies, which are told to hurt others. Blue lies are meant to help members of your own group and hurt members of other groups. .
Just fly high enough in an airplane and you can see the curvature of the Earth.
Even if it's one of the smaller planets of the solar system.
One of those people is Scott Adams, who has a frankly laughably stupid notion about gravity.Also gravity. They just don't understand how it works, because they lack the concept of what spacetime and a gravity well is.
...
I think some people just can't do that.
I threw my copy of The Dilbert Future into the recycling bin. I didn't want to give it to a charity shop in case someone's brain became infected with its memes.What if, says Adams, instead of gravity being an attracting force, it is merely the doubling in size of all objects every second – we wouldn’t perceive it as increase in size, because we’d be increasing along with all the other objects. Okay, this wouldn’t give us the usual acceleration of gravity at about 9.8 meters per second per second, but let’s let him slide on the math and assume he meant an increase in size at a rate that would give us the proper acceleration. How, he asks, would we be able to tell the difference between this and gravity the way we perceive it now? He gives us one answer, in the motion of planets around the sun, which should be bumping into each other all the time (and bumping into the sun, too). Luckily, he tells us, the universe is expanding, which allows all these objects to grow into it. How convenient that the rate of expansion in the universe is just enough to counterbalance the ‘gravitational’ increase in size of all objects.
One of those people is Scott Adams, who has a frankly laughably stupid notion about gravity.
http://www.insolitology.com/rloddities/dilbert.htm
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.