On the Kasidy situation: I believe it is always right to deliver medical supplies to those who need them. I also believe, however, that if you're going to engage in criminal activity as a matter of conscience, it is unfair to involve others without their knowledge, even if you feel their stance on the matter is unreasonable.
On the Kira Meru issue, I don't see that as her moral dilemna. She was under duress. Any moral responsibility in that case is Dukat's. I would say "She did what she had to do," full stop. I would feel the same way whether she had a family or not.
On the Dax/Tandro situation, I believe that cheating, or participating in someone else's cheating, is never the right thing to do. So, Dirty Old Man.
As for Kira bombing civilians, I believe that a member of an occupying nation who lives on occupied land is supporting that occupation. They are not innocent victims of whatever resistence they may encounter. (I say this, mind you, with no clear idea of how much choice Prin had. Was he bound to the family he served, with no ability to find employment elsewhere? I would consider people without freedom of movement an exception here, as they are oppressed themselves.) I'm also a pacifist who favours non-violent resistence techniques. I would say that, as a limited moral relativist, I support Kira's actions, but I wouldn't say they were right for me, and I would encourage oppressed people to use non-violent tactics first.
Bilby: crime for profit motive is never the right choice, especially when you have a family who might be threatened.
Bashir's parents: if Julian had serious problems that could be solved with genetic enhancement, Federation law would have allowed the procedure. They risked Julian's mental and physical health for their own peace of mind.
Odo allowing innocent people to be executed: Odo failed to meet his own moral and professional standards here. I don't know enough about the situation and the pressure he was under to judge him. (We can't get an objective picture of the situation from the distorted flashbacks of a man with a guilty conscience.)
Bashir and Bareil: Bareil, an adult with no mental health problems, refused to lose any more of his individuality by submitting to further procedures. Forcing them on him would have been completely and absolutely wrong. (I haven't seen the episode in awhile. Did Bareil ask Bashir to take the action of removing life support, or did they simply allow him to die? Either way, Bareil's wishes were paramount and I think it was right to respect them.)
Kira in Progress: the people on that moon had been fully informed of the consequences of staying, and were still determined to stay. They should have been allowed to do so. (I still wonder why the Bajoran government didn't settle the moon and farm it. It was such a nice moon, and the planet itself still had poisoned soil and crop shortages. Was the energy they gained so tremendous and long-lasting that it was really more beneficial than settlement, or was the Bajoran government just really short-sighted?)
Sanctuary: I also wonder why the Bajoran government turned away an entire people of farmers who were willing to help make Bajor self-sufficient. Of course, I don't know what kind of population density Bajor had. I don't think it's wrong to turn away refugees if you truly don't have room/resources for them, but if you do, I feel you must welcome them. Turning away refugees they can afford to take is one of the worst things a nation can do.
Keiko vs. Winn: The way you've posed this question doesn't address the fact that Winn wasn't acting in good faith, but using her religion as a tool. I'll address Keiko's part in the matter. Keiko didn't know that Winn wasn't sincere until well into the dispute, and I think she should have worked harder to find a compromise. Especially since there was nothing in Bajoran belief about the wormhole that was inconsistent with the science she was teaching. (Nothing that the viewers got to hear about, anyway.) Keiko struck me, in this episode, as just as fundamentalist and unreasonable as Winn.
Rom's assassination attempt: if Rom's attempt had been made where it wasn't illegal, I would acknowledge his right to follow his culture's rules. I'd also encourage the Ferengi to reconsider those rules.
Worf and Kor: Absolute power and such.
Tom Riker: This stumps me. It's not an episode I particularly enjoy, so I haven't seen it in quite awhile. I guess my answer would be "I don't care."
Garak: I feel that, by Cardassian standards, he was a moral man. I don't agree with Cardassian standards, though. I find him fascinating and attractive and safely fictional; I wouldn't actually want to be around someone like him in RL.
Dukat: Evil. I feel that, by both Cardassian standards and mine, Dukat was immoral. He cheated on his wife, he raped Bajoran women, and he was more concerned about his own power than the good of the state or his family. His attitude to the Bajoran people was the classic "White Man's Burden" load of bullshit. I believe his interaction with Ziyal was tainted with incestuous subtext. (I should make clear that I don't think he touched her or anything. SUBtext. Not text.)
Section 31: a symptom of the only thing a true moral relativist can condemn: hypocrisy. If the Federation practiced what it preached, Section 31 wouldn't exist. As I believe that people
should practice what they preach, I obviously feel it shouldn't exist.
Genocide, etc... challenged Roddenberry’s vision which helped reinforce his ideas and made DS9 stronger as a Star Trek series.
Where hypocrisy and corruption is revealed and examined, it can be eradicated.