The final decision on the movie's reference title...

[MacGyvr]

TofuTrek: It may look like Star Trek, but it ain't Star Trek.

 

[Praetor]

JJTrek for me.

Star Trek fans, why so uptight?
You just got a film from Kid Dyn-o-MITE!

I lol'd.

 

[Gaith]

"The Future Begins" is a tagline, not the title. "XI" it is. Alternatively, in a nod to the new/parallel universe, ST' could work, though that's complicated by calling the original Spock "Spock Prime".

 

[Gepard]

ST' could work.

That's so geeky it's fantastic.

 

[Oso Blanco]

What about Star Trek Lite?

 

[THE CHEBB]

ST2009XI: Electric Boogaloo?

That my friend would be the sequel - ST2009XI.2: Electric Boogaloo which would be filmed back to back with ST2009XI.3: The Final Reckoning...I'll make sure to invite ya to the set...

 

[Brutal Strudel]

Check the sig.

 

[ATimson]

Alternatively, in a nod to the new/parallel universe, ST' could work, though that's complicated by calling the original Spock "Spock Prime".

Wouldn't that make this ST, and TOS ST'?

 

[TrekGuide.com]

"Trek 2.0"

 

[Gaith]

Alternatively, in a nod to the new/parallel universe, ST' could work, though that's complicated by calling the original Spock "Spock Prime".

Wouldn't that make this ST, and TOS ST'?

Well, in math, the secondary point/line/whatever takes the prime (') designation. So Old Spock should be plain Spock, and every other character in this film should be prime, and the universe should be prime. Thus TOS=ST, and Trek XI=ST'.

 

[The Wormhole]

If I could make a suggestion - STINO

 

[Rii]

I sticking with nuTrek, stuff y'all.

 

[Skywalker]

If I could make a suggestion - STINO

I thought for sure you'd suggest ST0001.

 

[Sector 7]

Let's see, we have:

ST:TMP
ST:TWOK
ST:TSFS
ST:TVH
ST:TFF
ST:TUC
ST:GEN
ST:FC
ST:INS
ST:NEM

So maybe:

ST, ST:STAR or ST:STR
It could be shortened to 'STR' when we're talking about the movies.

J.

I like this idea. It's exciting!

But ST11 implies it's a follow-up to NEMESIS--which completely misrepresents the whole reboot agenda of the new movie. And more distance we put between this film and the old sequence, the better!

QFT!

Technically, that's correct. But conceptually the whole raison d'etre for this movie is to make a break from the previous sequence. Treating it like just another sequel misses the point.

The premise of a "reboot" depends on the audience willing to ignore or forget what was in the previous incarnation,

They did. Most of the people seeing ST09 were already ignoring what was in the previous incarnation.

What about Star Trek Lite?

Star Trek Right is closer to the truth!

 

[EnsignRicky]

We are a strange lot. All this ado over something the rest of the world wrote off as Star Trek XI five minutes after it was first announced. A system that has worked well enough for the last four number deprived movies and looks to continue into the next one. Infinite diversity in infinite combinations indeed.

 

[Quest_techie]

NeuTrek

 

[NiteTrek]

Call it Star Trek: TOS2

 

[Praetor]

ST2009XI: Electric Boogaloo?

That my friend would be the sequel - ST2009XI.2: Electric Boogaloo which would be filmed back to back with ST2009XI.3: The Final Reckoning...I'll make sure to invite ya to the set...

Why, thanks.

Check the sig.

Ooh, I missed that.