• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Domestic Box Office run is ending, International is kicking in.

Status
Not open for further replies.
You do what they do in TV shows. Make part of the show as cheaply as possible - a bottle show or near to it - and save the budget for later when you need it.

Start on the ship set with only the regular cast. Have them go somewhere, beam some down to an Earth like planet. Have them get in trouble. Have them deal with it while something happens on the ship.

So far, you've saved on expensive guest stars, used existing ship sets and natural environments. You haven't hired Idris Elba, spent a fortune on the Yorktown design and effects, the swarm, destroying the Enterprise and a huge planetary set, and you're still at about the same point of the film. Use plot and acting to get you there, then use the savings to pay for a more spectacular final act. It still doesn't need to be quite as over the top as Beyond.

Save even more by seeing which cast members would accept reduced salaries in exchange for % points...




I'm sorry ?

Beyond was (surprisingly, given that Pegg wrote it) stylistically identical to the previous two. No improvement whatsoever...

Nailed it. They could easily do a tense 'balance of terror' type movie that would be like, say 'crimson tide' that would absolutely rock for 100 million.
 
Deadpool was made for $58 million, and it had a few big sequences. I don't think a budget cut for Star Trek 4 would mean the end of big setpiece action, just a reduction in big setpiece action.
 
I wonder how much money Beyond could have saved if they had cut the Yorktown and the Swarm and filmed more of the movie on the planet of Altamid. The planet scenes were the best bits in the movie, so they could have saved money and made a better film.
 
The biggest problem in budget cost reduction for ST4 are actors salaries. The cast salary renegotiations raised Beyond's budget $10 to $15 million. Chris Pine's went from $600,000 for ST09, to $1.5 million for STID, to $6 million for Beyond. And that's Pine alone, not counting Zachary Quinto (whose on equal pay grade) and Zoe "GotG" Saldana and the rest of the crew/cast. You do the math. And to think there was talk of bringing back Chris "Thor" Hemsworth for ST4! :rofl:
 
Well, seeing as it's certainly NOT on the bomb list for the summer, I'd say we'll know pretty soon.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/gal...ce-bombs-of-2016-so-far/ss-BBw5PYX?li=BBnb7Kz Exhibit A.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainm...sers-at-the-box-office-this-summer/ss-BBvRbYY Exhibit B.
I'd say Paramount should recognize that if their marketing had been better and they hadn't pulled the first trailer because of a small segment of the public and released the film in May, it might've done better.
 
Well, seeing as it's certainly NOT on the bomb list for the summer, I'd say we'll know pretty soon.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/gal...ce-bombs-of-2016-so-far/ss-BBw5PYX?li=BBnb7Kz Exhibit A.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainm...sers-at-the-box-office-this-summer/ss-BBvRbYY Exhibit B.
I'd say Paramount should recognize that if their marketing had been better and they hadn't pulled the first trailer because of a small segment of the public and released the film in May, it might've done better.
Funny how according to that one list Suicide Squad is a loser. It cost a bit less than Beyond but has made almost $600 million. I bet Paramount wishes Beyond was as big a loser as that.

But you do have a point regarding the marketing. For a time after the first trailer dropped, I forgot that Beyond was being released this summer at all thanks to Paramount keeping things quiet earlier in the spring.
 
They must have pulled the trailer from the theater I first went to see TFA at. I mean... WTF? I wanted to see that trailer!
 
We didn't get it either.

Then again, we also got Star Wars nearly a day before everyone else. It's a bit of a wash really.
 
Pretty soon?

Don't think so. Paramount is in big trouble. Those troubles need to be solved first before they greenlit another movie. Could take years.

And how on earth could they release Beyond in May when Lin was working on the movie until July...
 
Nailed it. They could easily do a tense 'balance of terror' type movie that would be like, say 'crimson tide' that would absolutely rock for 100 million.

I know that, you know that. However the moronic suits at Paramount don't understand such basics of filmaking.
 
And how on earth could they release Beyond in May when Lin was working on the movie until July...

He was working on it till July despite needing to get the print out to cinema's that month as it released in July?

They did some post reshoots in March so I assume by May at the latest it would of been complete no way July that seems insane. We all know the early production of STB was a total mess and again another failing of Paramount. The July date was a big reason why the film suffered.
 
Well, seeing as it's certainly NOT on the bomb list for the summer, I'd say we'll know pretty soon.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/gal...ce-bombs-of-2016-so-far/ss-BBw5PYX?li=BBnb7Kz Exhibit A.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainm...sers-at-the-box-office-this-summer/ss-BBvRbYY Exhibit B.

Like BJWagner said, one list has Suicide Squad branded as a loser even though it was made for $175 million and has passed the $600 million mark worldwide. Paramount would wish for Beyond to be such a 'loser'.

As for having ST4 news pretty soon I highly doubt it. Viacom and Paramount execs don't have only Beyond's trouble to think about. If you look at the above "10 biggest box office bombs of 2016" list, three of the ten bombs are Paramount movies (Zoolander 2, Whiskey Tango Foxtrot and Ben Hur). 2017 doesn't look so good either. That will mean changes, budget cuts and cancellations all over the board.
 
I really wouldn't mind seeing a smaller budget movie with this cast, writers and team behind it. I loved Beyond, but I kept thinking how there was so much you could've cut to save money if needed.
 
I really wouldn't mind seeing a smaller budget movie with this cast, writers and team behind it. I loved Beyond, but I kept thinking how there was so much you could've cut to save money if needed.

As much as I enjoyed the film, you can't deny in parts they were going for some seriously OTT action scenes in this. The saucer flip is a perfect example, it was brilliantly entertaining but could have easily been written out if needed. A tense sci fi thriller is what is needed next, not another ridiculous blockbuster if the budget is inevitability going to be reduced, or if the film even happens at all, which to be honest you've got to question considering beyond is going to seriously struggle to score a meaningful profit at this stage.
 
The list of box office bombs is wee bit premature. There is another film which looks more likely every day as a bomb - Kubo and the Two Strings. It is sitting at $19 million with a $60 million budget.

Suicide Squad is haning in there and, regardless of its flaws, is staying in the top ten, while Star Trek Beyond is no longer in the top ten. One thing for certain is that the film domestically will not reach $185 million.

The board at Viacom has signaled their confidence in Paramount's leadership. The plan for a turnaround was persuasive and was a contributing factor for this continued vote of confidence.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/paramount-pictures-chief-gets-vote-of-confidence-from-viacom-1472240286

It looks like Paramount will be expanding their animation and television departments.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top