The bottom line is that if a man appears on the flagship of The Federation without contest via advanced technology, someone would be researching every scrap of data they have on the guy in order to ensure that he isn't A) a genuine threat and/or B) an otherwise harmless fake. "Berlinghoff" comes from a time when technology is all-around superior and his Earth is either already at or close to the "one world government" stage. Anyone even mildly invested in this task would have a computer search through historical as well as contemporary records (assuming the computer isn't intelligent enough to spit out "anomalous" results originating from the past in the first place). Barring an absence of information stemming from a lack of registration or a deliberate erasure, it is likely that an entry would have betrayed him.
This is how I've always viewed it. The time pod already had a program to leave for that spot where the 1701-D finds it. The real time traveler was actually going to study them there, which could explain how the imposter might've known some things about them, if there'd been some open/available files on them around the podOne of the reactions that came back in that thread was that possibly he wasn't able to really program the pod, and only could follow a preprogrammed itinerary, and hence couldn't select his destinations.
Who knows if this guy was anyone important enough to even have centuries old photographic records of anyhow. I'd think not.
Possibly not. He did take his clothes, & he most likely did hold him hostage though. So the result is the same. He would've had to abandon him back in 22nd century New Jersey though, which if he was planning on returning to that time, it would be a bit dangerous to leave that guy around back there. So, he 'd have been better off if he'd eliminated him altogether.Another possibility is that he killed the owner of the pod before he'd truly intended to.
Though, is it ever explicitly stated that he killed the original owner?
Yeah, but in a couple hundred years no one is going to be bothering to keep that record around if I'm nobody, & if I were to just show up, having been some total insignificant from 200 years earlier. It's at least believable I could get by a few days without anyone tracking my identity down, with nothing to go on but my mug... especially if I had some stolen documents to bootIf you apply for a driver's license or a general identification card, you'll get your photo taken during the process; that photo is then disseminated to multiple databases. Whenever your license or ID is renewed, a new photo is taken; over the course of an individual's life, there will be several such means of visual identification assigned to their name and one or more of them will be persisting on governmental digital storage somewhere. The development of facial recognition software is progressing quickly today...imagine how much more improved it will be in two hundred or so years with alien technology in the mix.
Yeah, but in a couple hundred years no one is going to be bothering to keep that record around if I'm nobody, & if I were to just show up, having been some total insignificant from 200 years earlier. It's at least believable I could get by a few days without anyone tracking my identity down, with nothing to go on but my mug... especially if I had some stolen documents to boot
Even if he was confronted with a photo of him of the 22nd century, he'd have shrugged his shoulders and said, 'Interesting, a guy from 400 years before my time had a strongly resembling face. Have you ever seen a picture of Arik Soong and compared it to that of his 24th century descendant dr. Noonian Soong? Or compared the pictures of Tom Paris and Nick Locarno?'
They'd still need a DNA scan to be sure.
And if, in the future, changing your face becomes trivially easy, that would probably be no longer be a useful means of identification either.
I always got that impression with the dialogue, "Oh, this is a time pod, and it is from the twenty sixth century. At least that's what the poor fellow said. You see, he decided to travel back to the twenty second century, that's my time, and he had the misfortune of meeting me. His clothes fit quite well, don't you think? Took me weeks to figure out how to work this thing." He took the time traveler's clothes and then had to figure out how to operate the machine, presumably without the assistance of the traveler (cause he was dead ["poor fellow"].Another possibility is that he killed the owner of the pod before he'd truly intended to.
Though, is it ever explicitly stated that he killed the original owner?
I always got that impression with the dialogue, "Oh, this is a time pod, and it is from the twenty sixth century. At least that's what the poor fellow said. You see, he decided to travel back to the twenty second century, that's my time, and he had the misfortune of meeting me. His clothes fit quite well, don't you think? Took me weeks to figure out how to work this thing." He took the time traveler's clothes and then had to figure out how to operate the machine, presumably without the assistance of the traveler (cause he was dead ["poor fellow"].
Maybe.Cheeriest murderer ever?
I always got that impression with the dialogue, "Oh, this is a time pod, and it is from the twenty sixth century. At least that's what the poor fellow said. You see, he decided to travel back to the twenty second century, that's my time, and he had the misfortune of meeting me. His clothes fit quite well, don't you think? Took me weeks to figure out how to work this thing." He took the time traveler's clothes and then had to figure out how to operate the machine, presumably without the assistance of the traveler (cause he was dead ["poor fellow"].
I mean if he went through that whole effort, he might as well have killed him.I didn't think Rasmussen stated that he explicitly killed the pod's former owner. It could be that he simply left the time traveler stranded after their encounter, then...possibly in a space and/or time period from which escape might be nearly impossible.
Why? Not everything has to be connected. Neil Armstrong's and Buzz Aldrin's ancestors didn't help the Wright brothers build their plane.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.