Except it was "aural sensitivity."
Is that right? Meaning, have I been that wrong all this time?
I'd love to be wrong about this, but it sure struck me as an ick scene.
Yes (e.g.). But think about it. If you're a linguist, what needs to be especially keen at sensing things more than the other, your ears or your mouth? I don't believe that precise articulation and exceptional enunciation are best described by "sensitivity."