I suppose this sucks the fun out of the proceedings but:
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/IdiosyncraticEpisodeNaming/LiveActionTV
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/IdiosyncraticEpisodeNaming/LiveActionTV
Fascinating. I didn't realize so many shows used naming conventions.I suppose this sucks the fun out of the proceedings but:
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/IdiosyncraticEpisodeNaming/LiveActionTV
Friends used "The One With ...".Fascinating. I didn't realize so many shows used naming conventions.
The title of every Seinfeld episode should have been "Still About Nothing."Friends used "The One With ...".
It's possible. Some glass was pretty brittle back in the day.I don't think it's supposed to be that easy to fall through a window by breaking the glass.
They would have had to hire Jim Steinman.Every episode of La Femme Nikita's first season had a single-word title, all the second-season episodes had two-word titles, and so on. If the show had lasted longer than 5 seasons, the episode titles wouldn't have fit on the screen!
Star Trek had some good ones, too. I miss that.Not really a naming convention, but there was a vogue for flowery, pseudo-poetic or pseudo-literary episode titles in TV dramas of the 1960s. Naked City was especially infamous for those.
It's a bit cheesy how they film the news right outside of Brit's office. Has the unintended effect of giving the Daily Sentinel too small a sense of scale. TV studios are big spaces, they don't film the news in the office next door.
It just seems like this show's own brand of "Do more than four people work at this newspaper?" to me. Having a TV station should make it seem like a big operation, but running the newspaper and TV station out of three adjacent rooms makes it seem far too Mayberry-scale.
So now they're on "Ralph Hanley"...did they ever change it back, or did he stay "Hanley" for the rest of the series?
I'm not familiar with that story first-hand, but one moment strikes me as something that they probably tore right off the page--the Joker getting in a quick soliloquy about Batman's utility belt when he's supposed to be choking on gas.This 2-parter is an adaptation of "The Joker's Utility Belt" by David Vern Reed and Dick Sprang, appearing in Batman #73 in 1952. It's close enough that by modern standards, they'd probably be entitled to story credit.
Glad it wasn't just me. I'm not sure what we're supposed to think is happening in that scene. Were they supposed to be hidden in the pedestals? Or the statues themselves? If so, it's not conveyed very well...you'd think there'd be some debris.It's always seemed to me that the scene in the Hall of Fame was written with the assumption that the statues would actually be the actors holding really still, and that the henchmen would actually look like the famous comedians. It's a case where there's a pretty distinct mismatch between the script and the production.
Wouldn't it seem conspicuous to anyone that a Pagliacci performer would wear a rubber clown mask instead of just make-up?the Pagliacci encounter where the Joker debuts his belt
You know any other Ralph Hanleys? Yeah, I was just commenting about what was on in the background at the moment. I know the reason for the switch, I was just wondering how long it stuck (which you answered). Had to verify that "few episodes" comment, as they were only on the fourth...hadn't realized the first season was an uber-short mid-season replacement affair.Are you talking about The Greatest American Hero? They changed Ralph's surname from Hinkley to Hanley after John Hinckley, Jr. shot President Reagan, but they changed it back at the start of the second season. So it was only Hanley for a few episodes.
...which point out the anomaly that most of the dialogue and narration in this episode seems to have been written under the assumption that "Boy Wonder" was Robin's actual superhero name, rather than a descriptive epithet.
Robin's Holy Exclamations usually go by me without much notice, but Dick's "Golly G-minor!" got a good belly laugh out of me!
Yay, it's the Giant Lighted Lucite Map of Gotham City!
Doesn't he use his own newspaper to maintain that reputation?Not much to say about this one. The plot revolves around the Hornet's reputation as "the most masterful criminal of our time"...a reputation that he somehow manages to perpetuate despite not actually committing any crimes.
That's an interesting observation. I wonder if details like that contributed to the Hornet making less of an impression. I remember when Next Generation first came on the air, I loved the new dynamic of the captain staying on the bridge where he should be, while the younger first officer did all the beaming down-- then I found out that people were complaining, and they phased out that aspect of the show.A minor thing that bugs me a little about the show in general...granted, it's Bruce Lee doing the driving, but there's something unsexy about a hero who sits in the back seat....
That could only go so far...where are the actual crimes? Show me the stolen money!Doesn't he use his own newspaper to maintain that reputation?
Certainly watching it side-by-side with its sister show, Batman...if the latter was what audiences were looking for, TGH must have seemed pretty underwhelming for its more straight-faced and less colorful/OTT approach. Like I said upthread, I think this show would have worked a lot better in the b&w era. I like its potential more than its execution.That's an interesting observation. I wonder if details like that contributed to the Hornet making less of an impression.
Too bad Ahnold didn't take note.And George Sanders is rather chilling, pardon the expression, in his more vengeful moments. He's not playing for laughs the way so many of the Bat-villains do -- he's deadly serious.
Might such instantaneous and extreme changes in temperature also have effects on the inanimate objects in the room? Drink-chilling and baked Alaska jokes aside, how can Freeze even eat food that was prepared at normal temperature and then thrown into a -50 degree zone?I probably also wondered how the areas could be heated and chilled so instantaneously
To be fair, though, they wouldn't have seen his presence in the beginning of the previous episode the as plot set-up that it proved to be.And Batman and Robin were off their game here. They should've realized that Freeze's "Strike one/Strike two" theme in the skywriting taunts, combined with the diamond theme of his crimes, pointed toward Paul Diamante.
The Green Hornet
"Crime Wave"
Originally aired September 30, 1966
Not much to say about this one. The plot revolves around the Hornet's reputation as "the most masterful criminal of our time"...a reputation that he somehow manages to perpetuate despite not actually committing any crimes..
Batman
"Instant Freeze"
Originally aired February 2, 1966
So here we have our first Mr. Freeze, who has a normal skin tone. This villain not only has an unseen past with the Caped Crusader, but a Batman-involved origin, to boot! And the episode takes place in July, well out of sync with when it aired (or was likely shot).
Isn't it convenient that Alfred always seems to be in the study when the Batphone rings?
Batman puts a lot of effort into developing an anti-cold (Bat-)pill...couldn't he just work on a protective suit?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.