Shoot.
In the tv show he's "just" The Deep who demanded the price of admission from Starlight, lying straight to her
Shoot.
And as you can see, I deleted my post even before your answerThe whole topic is marked Spoilers.
Looks more like a psychotic Bradley Cooper too me.The chap who played Homelander (awesome character by the way) looked and sound very much like Chris Pine. It was very unnerving.
I'm mildly curious, I know that this is a pretty extreme show, I'm just curious to know if the show is as unabashedly offensive as the comic, or if they did the smart thing and modified it to be less fucked up, like how every adaptation of Mark Millar's work has had to do to make the story adaptable. I know The Boys comic has a reputation for being extremely sexist, among other things, so I figured that if Amazon was adapting it they'd pull a "Kick-Ass" and change a so fucked up its basically unadaptable story to make it so its somewhat less problematic. I'm just curious if they ended up doing that.
All the articles Ive seen talk about how extreme the show is, but no one really goes into if its as bad as the comic or if they did changes to make it more palatable to an audience bigger then the hardcore fans of the writer (to be clear I know this show is too offensive for me personally to ever watch, I'm just curious about the adaptation vs the comic).
It was fairly toned down from the comics. If the comics were a 10 on a 1-10 scale for sex/violence this would be around a 7. There are some pretty violent and graphic scenes, but still not as extreme as the comics.
The non-consensual oral sex still occurs to Starlight, but in the comics she was forced by like 3 or 4 members I believe and in the show it is one (which actually was someone not involved in the comic)
I think the main reason the violence level is lower is that in the comics the Boys have access to "Compound V" from the start. The CIA knows all about it already and the Boys use it on themselves to gain powers to fight the Supes and they have some pretty brutal fights because of it.
Where as in the show Compound V isn't found out until later and none of the human characters try it. (It's later said that the failure rate for adults to use it is pretty high).
No, this neat idea isn't in the comics. I have to say that I like this, because in the comics heroes don't do absolutely nothing to deserve their fame. They don't rescue anyone, they don't fight anyone. Their adventures are told by comics books, which are implied to be re-telling of real stories. In-universe it'sCool concept ( i don't know if it's also a storyline in the comics) is how Homelander used Compound V to create Supervillains so the Seven have someone worthy to fight (and boost ratings).
I was actually thinking he reminds me of Michael Fassbender. like. a. lot.The chap who played Homelander (awesome character by the way) looked and sound very much like Chris Pine. It was very unnerving.
Looks more like a psychotic Bradley Cooper too me.![]()
Yeah, but this one is actually kind of doing it right, as well as doing it without outright trampling an existing franchise where it doesn't belong imhoHaven't we seen enough nihilistic superhero stories after Zack Snyder burned the DCEU to the ground? Apparently not.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.