• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The biggest flaw

There's a difference between knowing the orientation of a spacecraft with respect to the galaxy's "disk" and maintaining the spacecraft's orientation such that it matches that of the galactic disk. Why bother keeping the ship oriented based on that useless standard? The orientation of your ship relative to that of the galactic disk means nothing when you're traveling from star to star, or within a star system.
The point is one can suppose the tendency of ships to line up is a matter of traffic customs, widespread practices to make sure that one ship does not unintentionally ram the other. Given that the majority of ship encounters at least begin with non-hostile intentions that seems reasonable; at least, it's no less reasonable than the widespread agreement on what are hailing frequencies and how to transmit visual signals.

The comments abouts planetary orbits, solar systems, and even the galaxy having preferable directions are to answer the people who insist there can't possibly ever be any non-arbitrary directions in space so how do you tell up from down. There are non-arbitrary directions, obvious to any people able to seriously contemplate travelling in space. There's local north and south and even a Galactic North and South.

(Finally I'd like to note that the Original Trek, when it did have multiple ships in the same shot, didn't bother making them line up with any particular rigor, probably because they were straining the effects processing just to have two ships in the same shot at all.)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top