DigificWriter, I think the point was not list the *best* couples/relationships, not all you can think of.![]()
Hee. However, the couples I listed aren't ALL of the couples that I could think of; they're just my favorites.

DigificWriter, I think the point was not list the *best* couples/relationships, not all you can think of.![]()
My vote would be for Aeryn Sun and John Crichton on Farscape. They had great chemistry.
Right. Plenty of actors have chemistry, it's their job. It's the writing for romantic couples that usually is deficient. Crichton and Aeryn had a dramatic tension that stemmed from the characters inherent qualities rather than any contrived nonsense keeping them apart. They simply had been raised in such divergent societies that to maintain a relationship would be a feat of sheer willpower.It is not just the chemistry of Ben and Claudia.
I loved that, too. It was a cross between the plot-dependent type of relationship (everything being so up in the air and chaotic with the plot that it interfered with their domestic bliss) and a genuine character-based conflict (Juliet being paranoid that Sawyer would never love her more than he loved Kate - I fully buy the notion that Sawyer did love her and not Kate, but understood why she could never accept that.)Although I will say that I really enjoyed the brief relationship we saw from Sawyer and Juliet in Season 5 of LOST.
Merits special mention as, yes, the FIRST Star Trek romance that didn't make me laugh, bore me, or set my teeth on edge.Nyota Uhura and Spock
In Farscape's case, it helps that the actors had a lot of control over what was going on. They would regularly change scripts and plot points mid-shoot because the actors didn't feel that their characters were being portrayed correctly within the script.My vote would be for Aeryn Sun and John Crichton on Farscape. They had great chemistry.
I expected this to be the first post, and it was.
The thread may now be closed.
Right. Plenty of actors have chemistry, it's their job. It's the writing for romantic couples that usually is deficient. Crichton and Aeryn had a dramatic tension that stemmed from the characters inherent qualities rather than any contrived nonsense keeping them apart. They simply had been raised in such divergent societies that to maintain a relationship would be a feat of sheer willpower.It is not just the chemistry of Ben and Claudia.
Any dramatic tension that emerges from who the characters are is going to be superior to contrivances of plot, but it requires planning and care, and it's so much easier to just throw ridiculous excuses into the characters' paths instead, rather than go to the effort to create entire social structures behind those characters that explain who they are and why they can't just have sex and then be happy together.
Damn, I miss Farscape all over again now.
Merits special mention as, yes, the FIRST Star Trek romance that didn't make me laugh, bore me, or set my teeth on edge.Nyota Uhura and Spock
When she made out with the Doctor's mentally unstable clone right in front of him?The Doctor and Rose (they never got it together and the Doctor is generally asexual but they had great chemistry anf their last scenes together had great poignancy)
Doctor/Master (any incarnations will do, though I particularly like Davison/Ainley and Tennant/Simm) (you can't tell me that they are not a couple, because they SO are)
Joy
WTFDoctor/Master (any incarnations will do, though I particularly like Davison/Ainley and Tennant/Simm) (you can't tell me that they are not a couple, because they SO are)
When she made out with the Doctor's mentally unstable clone right in front of him?The Doctor and Rose (they never got it together and the Doctor is generally asexual but they had great chemistry anf their last scenes together had great poignancy)
Crichton and Aeryn
Sheridan and Delenn
There aren't any others of any consequence whatsoever compared to them.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.