I've been interested in seeing Hugo, is it really that bad?
It's actually very good. Both honour early filmmaking in their own ways, Hugo perhaps more technically, as it tends to be as much about George Milliers, one of the pioneers of silent film, as it is about Hugo. The Artist does it by being a silent film about silent films.
I disagree. I think it wasn't very good. The story lacks focus, and it feels very much like a vehicle for Scorsese (DRINK), to show how much he LOVES movies. The last 30 minutes feels tacked on...
Yes, I know what your opinion about it is. You've been very vocal about it everytime it's been mentioned. I wanted to give him a different opinion and point of view for him to be able to make up his mind about it.