• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Artist (new silent film)

The Lensman

Commodore
Commodore
I'm surprised I haven't seen any threads recently about this film. It's been out since November, had a somewhat wider release near me in December, and it looks like wins at Golden Globes have gotten it an even wider release.

The Trailer in case you haven't seen it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8K9AZcSQJE

I loved the hell out this film. It is, for me, a perfect film. There is nothing in this film that I have a problem with on any level. No complaints, or nits....nothing. The actors, down to the last extra, were perfectly cast and fit the period. The music was awesome and the story was straightforward and relied purely on the actors ability to carry it off without being heard. Even the dog was awesome!

The movie covers the years 1927-1932 and charts the fall of George Valentin and the rise of Peppy Miller. It's a movie about movies, the only antagonist is "progress", there's no action, explosions or sex. The movie has a fairly small scale, but you don't really notice it because the story and acting is so good. Silent film is a more personal experience than "talkies" because you have to fill in more on your own.

The actors "sound" however you want them to. (One reason some silent actors didn't last into the talkie era wasn't because they had "bad voices"....it's because their voice rarely matched how each person imagined it). You don't need to read lips, but what the actor says is rarely exactly what's on the intertitle. Plus the music, when well done, and it is here, creates an almost dreamlike feeling that you don't notice that you miss until it's gone.


As someone said, the movie is a silent movie that's aware that it's a silent move.....but it's also aware that the audience is aware of it too. A lot of silents had a somewhat leisurely pace, but this one does not...for a silent. There's a lot of amusing moments, several heartbreaking ones but it always seems to hold your attention. With solid writing and especially solid acting, no scene goes on too long and there's three musical montage sequences that help keep your attention.


There's some play on words and meaning, especially when you see actors "talk" about talking.
In one amusing sequence, Peppy says she's popular because "the audience can hear me." Of course you have to read this on an intertitle. :)

And a lot of nice scene construction, as the world has to help convey to the audience what's going on, what people are thinking or feeling. You may or may not even notice these things, but they are definitely there to help a modern audience not used to silents get the story beats.

(Mild Spoilers Follow)

When George and Peppy have a moment in George's dressing room, there's a poster in the background for one of his movies called "The Thief Of Her Heart". Or when George has fallen on hard times, he leaves an auction hall, almost getting hit by a car (the world no longer stops for George) and walks across the street. In the background is a movie theater called "The Lonely Star".

Or when George is watching his last silent movie, and career, bomb, the last scene of his movie is him sinking in quicksand, and as he disappears the words "The End" fade in. (This is one of the most heartbreaking scenes in the movie)

Any time you see George walking on a flight of stairs, he is always walking downwards, never up. Peppy is always walking upstairs, never down. There's a memorable scene where they pass each other on the stairs, to symbolize their new status.

There's also some nice music\montage sequences. One shows Peppy's rise in fame by showing us a series of movie credits. At first Peppy is little more than a part of group of dancing girls and her name is listed as such at the bottom. With each new credit sequence, her name get's higher and higher.

Or after George strikes out on his own to film his own movie, there's another nice musical montage. Ditto for once Peppy has hit the big time with the song "Pennies From Heaven" playing.


Now when the movie was originally released here in the states, you could only find listings for L.A. and NY. In December, it seemed to be getting wider distribution, playing at theaters known for "art house" type films. Here in Houston, from Dec. until this week, it was playing at only two theaters. Both of which showed "art house" type films. Now, post Golden Globe wins, it's showing at about ten or so theaters. In fact the one just down the street is showing it.

What commercials I've seen don't advertise the fact that it's silent. And people have walked out of it, though not in the times I've seen it. I think Ebert commented on it, and I read an article about some audience members in the UK doing so. So I'm not sure how long it will be in such a wide release.

The movie is an awesome movie, and it has been one of my greatest pleasures to watch an actual silent movie on the big screen. Although one of the original two theaters here had no more than fifteen people in it when I saw it there a couple of times. But the one more centrally located, in a bit more sophisticated area, was always packed (even though the cinema is much smaller).

I've seen the movie nine times so far, (and may make it ten tonight), and as I said, it's been an awesome to experience a silent on the big screen. But more importantly to experience it in a THEATER....with other people around. The first time I've really given a shit about that aspect over it being on a big screen.

Now one of the showings I went to was less than pleasant, as that whole group just did not seem to understand how a silent works and didn't seem to understand that they weren't supposed to laugh at certain scenes. And despite an awesome musical score, munching popcorn was much, much, much more noticeable. At the aforementioned "less than pleasant" showing, one of those "less than pleasant" moments came when the old coot in front of me sat down with nachos!

There's are at least two scenes where there is absolutely NO sound at all. Nothing. You get really aware of just how loud even quiet things are in a movie theater. LOL!

There's also a couple of scenes that feature sound. And they both grab your attention big time. The first is a scene with George at his make up table taking a drink. He set's his glass down and you can hear it. In fact, he can hear it....and he's puzzled by this. More and more ambient sound starts pouring in as he knocks over items on his table. You can hear his chair, his dog bark, people outside....the only thing not making a sound is.....George.

George wakes up in a cold sweat, the whole thing having been a dream.

The very end of the movie. It's somewhat jarring...a sort of "back to mundane reality, and you didn't even realize you'd feel this way because you've been listening to music for an hour and half" kind of thing. Realizing that George has a talent for dancing, and since musicals were big in the early '30's, George and Peppy do a dance number...When they finish, you hear them breathing. Cut to John Goodman and the director...you hear them breathing.

Finally Goodman taps the director on the knee and he yell's "CUT!!" and then Goodman says a few things and then, with two words, you find out why George would not speak on film. As they go for another take of the dance scene, you hear no music, but all the noise and mundane chatter that goes on on a movie set.

The dreamlike quality of this world is now gone and George has gotten a second chance at fame, in this new noisy and less magical world.

Some of the final words being "Quiet Please!"

fade to black, roll credits.

If you love silent film, you'll probably love this. But you DON'T have to be a fan of silent film to love or even enjoy it. I took a buddy who only went because I kept mentioning the film. He admitted he thought it was going to be dull, but ended up really enjoying the film.

The movie is a throwback, and yet despite that, it feels fresher than the most recent "CGI sploshin fest". It has it's darker moments, but it never let's the darkness overwhelm the movie. In the end, you'll probably walk out feeling glad you saw it.

As I told my friend before he went "It won't end up being your favorite movie, but you will enjoy it!"
 
I saw it a while back at a SAG screener. This is a very special movie. Something that doesn't come along very often. Everyone should see it.

It's a MUCH better love letter to film that Hugo.
 
I saw this today; I really enjoyed it. I'm not sure many people today have the attention span for a silent film, but I just adored it. The lead has a great Gene Kelly/Douglas Fairbanks vibe to him, and I really enjoyed the story. I highly recommend it, especially to anyone who is a film buff.
 
Well I do not know much about this film at all...but I watched the trailer, 1st time I saw in full, seeing only bits on tv before; and...it left me with chills! This is a taker.
 
The lead has a great Gene Kelly/Douglas Fairbanks vibe to him...
Or maybe John Gilbert?


I took away more of a mix of Fairbanks and Gilbert.

Fairbanks for the obvious reasons (the Zorro footage) and Gilbert for the way George's career evaporates.

And there's the obvious nod to Valentino with "Valentin".

Professor Zoom is right about this movie being something special. Go see it if you can. Put aside any misgivings about it being a silent movie......trust me. So many people complain about Hollywood not doing anything new, etc, etc....well this feels new and fresh.

No surprise that it's not a Hollywood film.
 
I finally saw this on Saturday ... only took a few months to get to Omaha. Sigh. Anyway, it was a *very* small crowd ... as in, we started with five, and ended with three. Two complained about 10 minutes or so in "Why aren't they talking? We have to READ the movie? Why don't they just talk?" and stormed out.

I thought it was pretty much fantastic, and am glad I got the chance to finally see it, after hearing about it for so many months.
 
I really want to see it, but all the theatres in my city are booked up with 3-D sequels, so I'll either wait for the Blu-ray in a couple months, or the inevitable reissue when it wins Best Picture at the Oscars. I get the feeling they're planning a Slumdog Millionaire scenario with this - the film only gets a limited release before the Oscars, then cashes in after it wins big with a reissue.

I finally saw this on Saturday ... only took a few months to get to Omaha. Sigh. Anyway, it was a *very* small crowd ... as in, we started with five, and ended with three. Two complained about 10 minutes or so in "Why aren't they talking? We have to READ the movie? Why don't they just talk?" and stormed out.

Some morons in the UK even managed to demand their money back because they somehow missed the part about the film being silent or were too stupid to appreciate it. For their sake I hope this thing wins Best Picture and we get a flood of silent movies, just to annoy the dummies. (That and it would be a great push-back against 3-D. And if you don't think someone isn't already figuring out ideas for a 3-D silent...)


Alex
 
It's strange because without the Golden Globes and the Oscars the film might have been forgotten in its own country.
It did well with 1 500 000 spectators, something like that, but it's not great. The 2nd most succcessful French movie of all time (Intouchables) was also released in 2011 and it sold 18 000 000 tickets.
 
I just saw this last night with my 2 brothers, and one brought his girlfriend.

In the theatre were my 2 brothers, his girlfriend, and myself. That's it.

One one hand, it was nice having the theatre all to ourselves, nobody talking or annoying us. On the other hand, it was such a shame because the movie was so enjoyable and magical. I really hope it does well at the Oscars and gets more attention, it's very deserving.

(And was it just me, or did Peppy remind anybody else of, like, Chase Masterson's younger sister or something?)
 
It's strange because without the Golden Globes and the Oscars the film might have been forgotten in its own country.

Which can be said for many films that do well at the Oscars and Globes. The problem is the movie is not 3-D or sci-fi/action so in North America ticket buyers aren't interested. (The fact The Help did so well for a few weeks last year was an anomaly). Thankfully no one makes movies like The Artist expecting to make money at the box office anymore; they anticipate their profit coming from doing well at the awards shows and the associated spike in Blu-ray and DVD sales later, and maybe a reissue too like what happened with Slumdog Millionaire which was never a box office hit until after it won at the Oscars because no one had ever heard of the movie before then.

Now that it's up for Best Picture and several of the big awards I'm hoping it cleans up, if for not reason it would appeal to my inner luddite to see a silent defeat a 3-D movie. I'm sure some clueless wonders out there will probably complain about The Artist getting a best screenplay nomination, clearly revealing they have no idea how movies were made before Al Jolson piped up.

Alex
 
Thankfully no one makes movies like The Artist expecting to make money at the box office anymore;

I don't think they made The Artist to make money at the American box office but to make money at the French box office. Don't forget that we're culturally very insular, the French cinema is a real industry with a particular public.
The fact that it does well at the Oscars (10 nominations, wow) is a surprise.
 
Two complained about 10 minutes or so in "Why aren't they talking? We have to READ the movie? Why don't they just talk?" and stormed out.
I saw similar morons when I first saw "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon". Idiots couldn't be bothered to read the subtitles.
 
Two complained about 10 minutes or so in "Why aren't they talking? We have to READ the movie? Why don't they just talk?" and stormed out.

.

Oh, man, that is so stupid. And sad. They probably bitched because it was black and white, too!

I think this was my favorite movie of the year. Simply marvelous.
 
Hmm... interesting. Guess what came out today on Blu-ray of all things. The very first Best Picture Oscar winner from 1927 - Wings. A silent film. Coincidence? I think not! And this was in the New Releases rack at Wal-Mart - we're not talking some obscure Warner Archive release you special order. Of course it's always possible the ordering office at Wal-Mart thought it was the 1990s sitcom...

Alex
 
Hmm... interesting. Guess what came out today on Blu-ray of all things. The very first Best Picture Oscar winner from 1927 - Wings. A silent film. Coincidence? I think not! And this was in the New Releases rack at Wal-Mart - we're not talking some obscure Warner Archive release you special order. Of course it's always possible the ordering office at Wal-Mart thought it was the 1990s sitcom...

Alex


Niiiice! I saw they were releasing it....is it only on blu-ray? I've got a couple of copies I made off TCM a few years ago (even made my own DVD case).
 
I saw a commercial for this on TV and was impressed that it was in black and white-- I had no idea it was silent. Very impressive. Unfortunately, it's only too easy to believe that the contemporary audience would avoid it or walk out on it. I hope this movie opens a few minds, but that's probably a vain hope. Everything these days has to have a billion-dollar budget and photorealistic special effects-- and now be in 3D, I guess.
 
Ten people at my showing. Four left. "Where's the colour? Is the projector broke?"

1. Cinema tickets cost £7 or more
2. The film was advertised as black and white/silent
3. The information is freely available online
4. There was a sign on the fucking cinema door!
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top