I think it's because Riker can be a bit of a dick.
He has his nose in the air with subordinates (Lower Decks is a good example). He beds women regularly. He is all talk when it comes to his career ambitions. He can be abrupt and abrasive at times. He's insecure and over-compensates by taking himself too seriously. He was an insubordinate ass to Jellico during a crisis situation. He took the wrong side in the Admiral Pressman incident aboard the Pegasus.
And for all this, he's my favorite TNG character, because he's a real, relatable, flawed officer who also kicks ass at his job. Just like a real person would be.
About the only thing you forgot was the him on the fence about his Imzadi BS, which was an unflattering position at best, & downright wrongful at it's worst. It's bad enough that the guy has passed over Deanna in any number of ways, but then when it looked like Tom Riker might have a shot to rekindle that love, what's he do? He torpedoes that shit.I think it's because Riker can be a bit of a dick.
He has his nose in the air with subordinates (Lower Decks is a good example). He beds women regularly. He is all talk when it comes to his career ambitions. He can be abrupt and abrasive at times. He's insecure and over-compensates by taking himself too seriously. He was an insubordinate ass to Jellico during a crisis situation. He took the wrong side in the Admiral Pressman incident aboard the Pegasus.
About the only thing you forgot was the him on the fence about his Imzadi BS, which was an unflattering position at best, & downright wrongful at it's worst. It's bad enough that the guy has passed over Deanna in any number of ways, but then when it looked like Tom Riker might have a shot to rekindle that love, what's he do? He torpedoes that shit.
As we all now know, after all the years of beating around the bush, Riker does FINALLY end up with Deanna, & they live tropely ever after, BUT frankly, when Tom 1st comes back, & wants to rekindle, he's shot down because of Will's claim that he too would break her heart. Tom can't reconnect with Deanna because of the implication of Will's transgression against her, even though Will manages to move past it with her & rekindle later on himself.
In retrospect, it all comes off as very self-serving. Every time I see them now, I'm reminded that Tom should probably have been the Riker she better deserved, because he didn't do any of the shit to her that Will did, which took them years to get past & finally reunite
What I've noticed is the discussions are always at least starting off negative about the characters most of the time I mean just look around here. Very critical of Troi, Geordi, Worf, even Picard.
He's always been one of my favorite characters in TNG. A decisive man of action instead of preachy, long-winded speeches.
Kor
I'd argue that in some ways, Tom has undergone growth that Will never will even understand. He's had time to reflect on what matters to him, & has an appreciation for Deanna that younger Will never wrestled with similarlyI understand your point, but isn't part of the issue that Tom hasn't 'grown up' yet, and proves this by (once again) jumping ship at the first opportunity?
He's undergone completely different character growth. It's not sensible to assume that Tom is just a stunted or paused Will. He's not Will 1.0. Those 8 years happened for both of them. Tom is a living embodiment of a different timeline. Neither of the Rikers are the same man who left Deanna, & if Will could grow, to be a better man than he'd been, then So could Tom.He hasn't undergone the character growth that Will has. He hasn't (such as it was) reconciled with his father, and he's still that hungry, ambitious Shelby-esque career officer he was at the start.
That's not how I see it. I see it as Tom gets shut out by Deanna, & turns immediately to the only other thing he valued in his life.... and how well did that work out for him?And as I say, Tom does ultimately prove himself to be that younger, immature Riker. He doesn't waste any time moving on at the end of the episode.
I'd argue that in some ways, Tom has undergone growth that Will never will even understand. He's had time to reflect on what matters to him, & has an appreciation for Deanna that younger Will never wrestled with similarly
He's undergone completely different character growth. It's not sensible to assume that Tom is just a stunted or paused Will. He's not Will 1.0. Those 8 years happened for both of them. Tom is a living embodiment of a different timeline. Neither of the Rikers are the same man who left Deanna, & if Will could grow, to be a better man than he'd been, then So could Tom.
That's not how I see it. I see it as Tom gets shut out by Deanna, & turns immediately to the only other thing he valued in his life.... and how well did that work out for him?
In truth, Will drove Tom out, by being pretty unsympathetic & conflictual, & that drove a wedge between Tom & Deanna, because Tom felt he had no ability to stay there as long as Will was there, which is what he told her & why he pursued other avenues for his future. Deanna interpreted that as Tom being like young Will had been, prioritizing his career over her, (Prompted largely by Will's warnings no doubt) but that might not have happened if Tom had felt comfortable & welcome on the Enterprise (a thing Picard actually instructed them to do, & they didn't)
The fact that both Will & Deanna treat Tom as if he's a previous version of Will, is about the worst disregard they could've shown him, because it doesn't account for any of his individual life experience & wisdom, & that disregard sends Tom spiraling down a path of ruin, quite frankly, always trying to prove he's not just some lesser version of the real Riker
Personally, I think I'd have liked Tom better as a person than Will. The one thing that dude needed was some hard won humility
(BTW, over the years, I've really come to appreciate Frake's performance in that episode. All of those nuances are in there)
I think Tom offered more potential for interesting story telling & acting variety than Will did. I too would've preferred Tom to Will as a performer.Oh definitely, Frakes acted his arse off making the two of them the same, but distinct. I always got the impression one of his bigger regrets was that DS9 didn't bring Tom back one more time -- he often used to talk about it -- I suspect he quite enjoyed the challenge.![]()
I notice in my journeys through Star Trek fan groups that second only to conservatives is the community dislike of Will Rikers’ character. Why is this?
Can you share some insight to why you and others have such a critical view?
I think Tom offered more potential for interesting story telling & acting variety than Will did. I too would've preferred Tom to Will as a performer.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.