Okay, I've finished watching all six of the Hammer Dracula movies they marathonned t'other night, and I was not very impressed. Their Frankenstein movies are more interesting, because each one was a new variation on the premise, a different type of experiment that Victor Frankenstein was exploring. Dracula pretty much just has the one shtick over and over and over. Also, the Frankenstein movies rode on Peter Cushing's charisma. Only two of the Lee Dracula movies have Cushing in them, and they were the most entertaining of the lot. I wasn't that impressed by Lee in the role, since only 2-3 of the movies made any real use of Lee's greatest asset, that stentorian and sepulchral voice. Most of the time, Dracula was given no personality beyond being a ruthless predator, and that got kind of boring, especially with no recurring hero to root for, just a succession of random priests and random horny young men. Oh, yeah, and the religious piety of many of the films got a bit tiresome, particularly in Dracula Has Risen from the Grave, where the lead character was an atheist who had to embrace God at the end, and in Taste the Blood of Dracula, where the very confusing climax seemed to have Dracula defeated by the church he was in, even though it hadn't been a problem for him to occupy it before.
I did really like Peter Cushing in Dracula A.D. 1972, though. When he starred in Amicus's Doctor Who movies, he played a doddering, elderly scientist loosely based on the Doctor at the time, William Hartnell, but after seeing him in this, I think it would've been cool to see him play a more Pertwee-like version of the Doctor. I also think I might like to track down Hammer's The Brides of Dracula, which has Cushing's Van Helsing but not Lee's Drac.