You know, speculating as to what surprise I want is kind of besides the point.
I want to be surprised without conditions.
In the context of the movie, it will either work or it won't. If it works well, I'm happy ;-)
Please don't get me wrong, I'm not saying I'll boycott it if some connection to FG isn't included. I've had many preconceived ideas about what
should happen in Trek not manifest and I've never let my being wrong become reason to hate Trek or its producers for not doing it "my" way like some do.
FG is too obscure to establish the main bad guy on.
But they don't have to
establish the character as being FG. I just mean they may allude to FG in some way - perhaps his access to a time/communication device as scene on ENT - as an Easter egg for those who'll recognize the link.
Exactly, Therin.
Neon signs pointing to the fact we're seeing a continuation or closure of the FG arc are not necessary but including that info, even subtly, for anyone paying close enough attention to find would be a nice touch.