I had the same feeling. Her appearance in superman really turned me off to the character. She definitely doesn't think much or respect her cousin. I figured she wouldnt be so crass in her own movie than i saw the trailer. Lol
I had the same feeling. Her appearance in superman really turned me off to the character. She definitely doesn't think much or respect her cousin. I figured she wouldnt be so crass in her own movie than i saw the trailer. Lol
Depends on the character/ franchise.
I'm sure when Spider-Man Brand New Day premieres in August, it'll probably make very good box office and probably get close to if not over $1 billion dollars worldwide at the end of its run.
The garbage culture is being well represented in this thread.
The alternative is to go back before MeToo when actresses were objectified, sexually abused, and banned from their profession if they didn't play along. All Milly said is people still feel they can make comments over others bodies. What she left out is that men are commented on like that too, but it doesn't dominate the conversation as much as it does women. There are pages of this thread discussing Milly's attractiveness, but I don't recall people discussing Corenswet the same way when Superman debuted.
She didn't say "Christian Dads"--she referred to a specific type of social media user who uses the term "Christian dad" to describe themselves because using that term by itself, apparently without a photo, seems to be code for the specific type of misogynist that she is speaking out against.
Yeah, I wasn't claiming that was an exact quote, but obviously the reference was not to one specific individual, so I added the s. I think it was sufficiently clear.
Imagine people thinking they can say what they want!
Transformers made huge money at the box office and they were mediocre movies at best. If that's the quality and style of film we need for a sequel then I politely say "no thank you".
Spider-Man is a brand in its own right at this point - which is why the current projections are an opening weekend of $228m. The ups and downs of the super hero genre seen to make no difference to it.
You work really hard at this, don’t you?
And so proud of it, too.
People feel they have ownership over women's bodies.
And, yes, just imagine people saying what they want??!!?? Which is the comment I was responding too.
Hollywood is violently allergic to any sort of straightforward and earnest (super)hero; it needs to taint shining beacons with insincerity, vulgarity and a myriad of other mundane vices, either because of its worship at the altar of "relatability" or because its own character is suspect (i.e., "No person is really that good, so no fictional person will be ether."). Perhaps a bit of both?
Given Gunn's Superman was the most upright and upstanding version of the character since Christopher Reeve and Richard Donner's interpretation, I'd say you need to update your data set.
I don’t completely disagree with Ragitsu; the obsession with putting blood on these characters’ hands is an example of a desire to sully them. But drinking or saying swear words is NBD, and it’s kind of pearl-clutchy to regard it as such.
Hoechlin was a magician. Hell, the whole show was magic.
See also: Peter Parker, Steve Rogers.