Maybe. All we know for certain is that there are three window-like openings on the front of the bridge area on the kelvin. It may be a viewer too, or maybe not. Seriously, you need to stop making these assumptions.
It's not an assumption.
This is a window:
Abrams made the Kelvin have a front facing window for a viewscreen. Now, given that a single view would be pretty useless on a starship, we have to assume that the Kelvin's bridge window, can turn into a viewscreen whenever it needed to (to see ships approaching from behind for instance).
Yes, it is indeed an assumption. those three things may indeed be windows onto the bridge. That doesn't mean they are also viewscreens. Technically speaking, a mondo viewer isn't required. Each person may have their own viewer. We don't know.
Also, the Kelvin is supposed to be much older than the ENT, they will look vastly different on the inside, just as they look vastly different on the outside.
We certainly don't know that those three windows are window/viewers.
Nope, it doesn't. There is still no evidence to support this.
If you honestly believe there's no evidence to support the argument that it's a window, then by all accounts there's no evidence to say it's a viewscreen.
Other than it being this big thing that shows an angled to the port view of the exterior and it not being a window. Which makes it pretty obvious what it IS. It the same thing we've seen on bridges since TOS.
The fact that it clearly looks like a window, and clearly DOESN'T look like a viewscreen seemingly doesn't matter to you.
To you, maybe it looks window-ish.
A window and a viewscreen should look pretty much exactly the same. That's the whole point of a viewer, no? But since this is not showing a 'window view'...
And please don't give me the angled view of the saucer. Fact remains, we have to shots, each with different VFX, with no way of knowing which is the correct one... although you'd imagine the one where the window is in line with the registry/saucer is the correct one (the Empire pic)
So you think the earlier image is correct rather than the newer, bigger pic? So what, they 'fixed it' to look wrong or something?
I know what a plasma screen is, I just didn't know what your point was. It's reflective is it? Ok... so because our televisions are reflective now, it means starship viewscreens can be hundreds of years in the future.... interesting.
No, it means Abrams has a hard-on for glare. Look how bright that bridge is.
As dangerous as a viewscreen reflecting anything on the bridge in the heat of battle.
I think that the bridge will darken for red alert, thusly solving the glare problem.
As bright as the bridge is, a window that shiney would look like a mirror. Nothing would be visible through it.
