Yes, but policies can change when new people are in charge. Although of course it's pure speculation that this decision has anything to do with canon or continuity.
Did you change your mind over the weekend, Christopher? Last I recall you were telling me that it is contradictory to say that the film writers wanted their creative freedom. You said I was contradicting myself because the novels are never canon.
*sigh* I didn't change my mind, and there's absolutely no conflict between what I said to you and the statement above. In both cases, my point is that the people in charge of the franchise are the ones who
define what canon is. You said that they might be "locked in" by what the novels did if they decided to treat the novels as canonical, but that's self-contradictory, because if they did decide to treat the novels as canonical, then it's
the novels that would get changed to fit the next movie, not the other way around.
But of course, that's just disputing a logic error, and it probably has no real meaning anyway, because we now know that this decision was
not made by the filmmakers. So I don't know why I'm wasting my time trying to explain this again.