• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Summer Glau joining Dollhouse for at least 2 episodes

The current claims he's made are that he plans to merge the storylines of TSCC and T5.

He's going to have John jump back in time and end up in 2011 days before Judgment Day. Judgment Day in the films is in 2005, in TSCC it's in 2011. He has also said he is considering bringing in characters from the series.

It was in an interview that was posted on TerminatorFiles. Interestingly, the Save the Sarah Connor Chronicles website reported on the 26th that Warner Brothers is working on a D2DVD film.
 
The current claims he's made are that he plans to merge the storylines of TSCC and T5.

He's going to have John jump back in time and end up in 2011 days before Judgment Day. Judgment Day in the films is in 2005, in TSCC it's in 2011. He has also said he is considering bringing in characters from the series.

It was in an interview that was posted on TerminatorFiles. Interestingly, the Save the Sarah Connor Chronicles website reported on the 26th that Warner Brothers is working on a D2DVD film.

Yes, that is what I heard and most likely I wouldn't like it but I leave it up to the execution of the story IF that happens.

I'm just over backward timeraveling. We are in the Future War, its something I was glad to see the storyline get to. Now lets explore things in the 10yr gap till Kyle goes back to '84. Lets have those plasma/laser rifles in the next film and all sorts of glorious war fare with the 'nators.
 
^ He believes that the Future War was the reason why the film was so ill received from one of the interviews he did. He's going back to the chase style of the previous films.
 
^ He believes that the Future War was the reason why the film was so ill received from one of the interviews he did. He's going back to the chase style of the previous films.

The 'chase style' fits Future War. The Terminators are still chasing Connor and the Resistance. The only difference is the setting. Merging the two still has you in a "future present(2011)" vs our present of the first 3 movies.

It was the execution some had issue with not the Future War itself. I don't know what interview that is and maybe the ONE exchange did represent that. I don't see posts en masse indicating the setting was the issue.
 
^ He believes that the Future War was the reason why the film was so ill received from one of the interviews he did. He's going back to the chase style of the previous films.

The concept wasn't wrong. It was the execution.

This is almost as funny as Uwe Boll claiming BloodRayne flopped because the video game studio didn't back it enough with commercials and tie-ins.
 
^ He believes that the Future War was the reason why the film was so ill received from one of the interviews he did. He's going back to the chase style of the previous films.

The 'chase style' fits Future War. The Terminators are still chasing Connor and the Resistance. The only difference is the setting. Merging the two still has you in a "future present(2011)" vs our present of the first 3 movies.

It was the execution some had issue with not the Future War itself. I don't know what interview that is and maybe the ONE exchange did represent that. I don't see posts en masse indicating the setting was the issue.
I recall one being the MTV interview he did (he also plugged Supernatural) and there is another on TerminatorFiles where he specifically mentions that the Future War is harder because there is no defined enemy on the battlefield, all the Terminators are faceless. That's one of the reasons he wants to introduce the chase feel of the originals, use time travel again, and have a new model terminator chasing Connor.

I think that it was titled "Putting the FUN back in the franchise" or something like that, but there have been a few interviews with him since.
 
^ He believes that the Future War was the reason why the film was so ill received from one of the interviews he did. He's going back to the chase style of the previous films.

The 'chase style' fits Future War. The Terminators are still chasing Connor and the Resistance. The only difference is the setting. Merging the two still has you in a "future present(2011)" vs our present of the first 3 movies.

It was the execution some had issue with not the Future War itself. I don't know what interview that is and maybe the ONE exchange did represent that. I don't see posts en masse indicating the setting was the issue.
I recall one being the MTV interview he did (he also plugged Supernatural) and there is another on TerminatorFiles where he specifically mentions that the Future War is harder because there is no defined enemy on the battlefield, all the Terminators are faceless. That's one of the reasons he wants to introduce the chase feel of the originals, use time travel again, and have a new model terminator chasing Connor.

I think that it was titled "Putting the FUN back in the franchise" or something like that, but there have been a few interviews with him since.

That comment(McG's) doesn't make sense to me, "No defined enemy"?
Terminators=enemy
Resistance=heroes

How does having just one Terminator vs a Connor somehow make things more defined? :wtf: How is it hard to convey the difference exactly?

I had plenty of FUN with Salvation, saw it twice in theaters.

For all the posters about the net everywhere who scream in pain against rehashing plots and remaking movies I'd like to hear some outcry over this. McG just wants to tweak the old tired plot we've been give three times, read in countless novels/comics and watched for 2 seasons on TV.
Where are the voices screaming for originality and freshness now??
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top