• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Struggling to read "The Romulan War"

While we're talking about the Rom War books, is anyone else surprised, given that the next novel comes out in just two months, that there's been nothing officially revealed to promote the release? No teaser interviews, no final cover art, no text excerpts - nothing? By the way, when I asked the Pocket reps at Comic-Con about To Brave the Storm, they told me that it apparently completes the main Romulan War story. So the Romulan War is TWO big books total - Raptor's Wing and To Brave the Storm - and that's it. I was kind of hoping for more. At least a book per year to cover the complete conflict. Thoughts?

I'm with you on this. Of course, it has always angered me how little attention the franchise and startrek.com pay to the books. I tried at one time to get a contest going to design patches for the rest of the NX fleet in honor of the space shuttle program ending and to generate interest in the 2 Romulan War books this year. It got nowhere. Fans and franchise just don't seem to appreciate Enterprise.

I'm all for promoting the next book and raising Enterprise awareness. I may not be a Martin fan, but his books have done much to increase my enthusiasm for this series. These books deserve readership because Ent deserves to be continued.
 
1) Though Travis had strong Space Boomer roots, he was also not afraid to stand against them in favor of starfleet and to tell the old-schoolers that times were changing and they should embrace it. In both the episodes where Travis faced an old warp 3 (I think) freighter, he tended to stand against them rather than for them. Archer made a tough call in the Maru affair and Travis saw the entire event unfold; I just can't see him completely turning his back on his CO after all they had been through together and Travis KNOWING it was a no win schenario. Travis was well aware that he owed Archer HIS life on many occasions.

Owing someone your life doesn't mean you need to always be willing to go to bat for them, especially if they've done something you find yourself having a great deal of trouble forgiving. I think what we saw was Archer finally doing something that pushed Travis's sense of morality too far.

Maybe he did witness a no-win scenario, but it's not like endless numbers of fans haven't said, "I'd at least try doing this rather than just giving up." And those fans had a lot less invested in the situation than Travis did.

From where he was sitting it probably felt a great deal as though Archer was turning his back on the Horizon as well...if it had been the Horizon instead, Archer would not have behaved differently (Disclaimer - I haven't read KM in awhile).

Anyway, there's a difference between believing someone behaved improperly and believing they behaved in a manner that will prevent you from being able to work well with them going forward.

As to the main topic, I didn't speed through these books as I did through, say, Destiny, but that by no means doesn't mean I didn't enjoy them. I didn't find them a struggle, but the RW books have to paint an even greater tapestry than Destiny, as they're showing us the Romulan side and the perspectives of people who are watching from the sidelines. To take any of that away would be to simplify the story and would, to my mind, be detrimental. Of course, that also means that some of the stories will prove less captivating than others, especially if you're reading about charactes who really don't have any significance to the greater arc.

We all know that during the Dominion War DS9 couldn't really have been at the forefront of every major situation that occurred, but we accept (for the most part) what we got because you couldn't expect the series to start hopping around the galaxy showing events unrelated to the main characters. I consider it a strength of the novels that they aren't inhibited in the same manner.
 
It was the Maru's destruction that angered Travis. The Horizon was destroyed by the Romulans who flew it into a star but the ship was only declared as "Missing" as its destruction never became known to the characters.

I just think Travis' anger was unjustified and seemed to go against the many times he stood behind Archer in morally ambiguous situations and when it was Starfleet or merchant marine. Archer didn't merit Travis turning his back on him and I still don't see these actions in line with the character. Hoshi, yeah I believe Hoshi would leave, but not Travis; he had a better sense of duty and loyalty.
 
...I liked The Romulan War: Raptor's Wing....
...So the Romulan War is TWO big books total - Raptor's Wing and To Brave the Storm - and that's it....
I'm sorry for being nitpicky but it's Beneath the Raptor's Wing, not Raptor's Wing. I understand that was wan any easy mistake to make, but nonetheless it was driving me crazy.
 
Well, we're allowed to disagree. :) I think for Travis this was the straw that broke the camel's back...and I also think we were shown so little of Travis throughout the course of the series overall that we don't necessarily have the information we'd need to make assumptions as to how he'd behave beyond knowing that during the series he was unlikely to die or suddenly leave because the actor wasn't going anywhere.

The point I was trying to make was that for Travis the KM may have represented a sort of Horizon by proxy. If Archer gave up on the KM, he'd give up on the Horizon. But again, I haven't read the books in awhile so I may be getting things a bit muddled.
 
It's the only Trek novel I've given up on. I didn't enjoy any of the prior post-ENT novels, either. I found the direction uninteresting and I hated the apologetic retconning aimed at the most anal of TOS (not Enterprise!) continuity freaks.

yeah i found it horribly distracting and really ground the story to a halt when ever it popped up. there is some good stuff scattered through the book..some of the battles and some of the political stuff but at times it felt padded.
but will still buy the next one.
 
There's some good storylines in The Romulan warnovel but they should've dumped the stuff with Gannett Brooks they spent way too much time on the rival news reporters storyarcs in the book. I liked some of the sidestories of the differnt creew and the political intrigue with the Vulcans and Trip and T'pol's storyarc.I hope after To Brave the storm comes out there will be more Enterrpise novels coming out in the future there an abundance of Tng books. I think it's time more Enterrpise books got a chance to be written and get published .
 
Last edited:
I hope the next novel will focus more on the Enterrpise crew and less on other characters like Ganett Brooks would be nice.Show the toll the Romulan war is having on Starfeleet and the coalition of planets.

Aren't those contradictory hopes? As someone mentioned above, it's unrealistic to expect NX-01 and its crew to be the only people involved in significant events during the war. Spreading the focus beyond the core cast is how the first book showed the toll of the war on Starfleet and the Coalition.
 
Does he have an author page? Or on his personal? Link?

As far as I can tell, he has a regular Facebook page (the MM from Portland, Oregan). If you're linked to any other ST authors, he'll probably be there as a Friend. MM doesn't seem to have started a separate FB fan page.
 
I wish there was a sample chapter released from To Brave the storm or some other type of book news or cover art like Zane Gray mentioned. in the past we at least had some kind of updates about the Enterrpise novels.I'd like to see a Enterprise story anthology all the other tv series had books published for their tenth anniversary.
 
Last edited:
Ok i just finished it. I don't know what to say, there is no real resolution. Not really sure about this. Part 1 of 2? Not what i was expecting at all. So i suppose thats why i'm disapointed. I hope that reporter chick dies, shes so damn whiny and annoying.
 
Ok i just finished it. I don't know what to say, there is no real resolution. Not really sure about this. Part 1 of 2? Not what i was expecting at all. So i suppose thats why i'm disapointed. I hope that reporter chick dies, shes so damn whiny and annoying.
I agree ganett Brooks is really annoying.
 
Ok i just finished it. I don't know what to say, there is no real resolution. Not really sure about this. Part 1 of 2? Not what i was expecting at all. So i suppose thats why i'm disapointed. I hope that reporter chick dies, shes so damn whiny and annoying.


The reporter sections just felt like the author was trying to make a statement about "freedom of the press" in a time of war. Although it is somewhat interesting (I guess) to read about the reactions of everyday citizens to the war - the actual war parts were somewhat boring. There was an opportunity to build in real set piece action sequences - and the book seems to focus more on Vulcan infighting that the actual titular war.
 
Nice costume! Where did you get it?

The official "It's a Wrap!" auction, held over about two years through eBay. I own the Andorian Ambassador, Tellarite Ambassador, and Stunt Tarah costumes from ENT, a pair of male Andorian boots, a beautiful casual raw silk Epsilon 9 shirt from TMP, and the Pakled captain's costume from TNG. Among other items.
http://therinofandor.blogspot.com/search?q=it%27s+a+wrap

The Tellarite costume is quite gorgeous. The jacket is double-layered, both layers encrusted with decoration:


Gral costume back by Therin of Andor, on Flickr
 
For me, I felt that the author put way too many anti-war statements in the book. I do agree its nice to see the home front side, but do we really need comments about young men throwing their lives away, such as that character from a colony planet who decided to enlist in the MACOs, and the author really don't get it about the reason why you don't report your side's movements or the reason for press blackouts during really bad times in a war. As evident by history, people on the home front know when a war is going bad or good, so it really shouldn't have been Brooks' mission to show the real face of the war and that the Earth government is bad by suppressing the news.

Oh, the little Mars trip and the Native Americans attitude is again another stereotype that Martin put in there that offends me, being a Native myself. So far in one book, he offended me as a Vet and in another as a Native, I wonder what's next?
 
As evident by history, people on the home front know when a war is going bad or good, so it really shouldn't have been Brooks' mission to show the real face of the war and that the Earth government is bad by suppressing the news.

Actually history shows the opposite. When the government is allowed to censor news from the front, it makes it easier for the military to get away with abuses and atrocities. I agree with Walter Cronkite's stance on the subject: that the people have a right and a responsibility to know what their military is doing in their name. Of course specific things like troop movements, stuff that would endanger lives, shouldn't be reported, but that principle is all too often abused as an excuse for censorship and whitewashing.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top