• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

STID - Plum's Review :) [SPOILERS]

Plum

Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Hope I'm posting this in the right spot. :)



SPOILERS!


Shit!



Star Trek Into Darkness, or STID (and since the title of this flick is a grammatical fuck up that acronym will remain thus!), is the sort of flick that makes Roger Corman cry... because he didn't get a cheque! I mean that in the best possible way. I love Roger Corman movies and in the same way I loved STID. It was cheesy fun! The film felt like it took some of the worst and some of the best of Star Trek and mashed them together, and I have to say it works. The character dramas veered from hilarious to eye rolling to tearful to screaming with all the cohesion of a Hong Kong cop flick from 1975, this roller coaster doesn't look back. No to much in the way of deep thoughts except for a very sub sub-plot about militarism which amounts to about as much as Captain Kirk musing; Hey Bones, ever hear of a Doomsday Weapon?



From the get go this film is completely committed to going from one action set piece to the next. The pacing is relentless. The plot points a blur of exposition and clever quips that barely land onto the ground. Logic, out the air-lock. But it all holds together perfectly thanks to a tight script and earnest performances from the cast. Perhaps the best thing that holds the film together is the terrific characterizations of our iconic heros. Kirk, Spock, Bones, and the crew. Their interactions with each other really shine.



Action! Yep, this is definitely a summer action flick. No sooner does a point of dialog end when the movie suddenly remembers there hasn't been any action and too much talking for at least 3 minutes, then something goes boom! The opening sequence really demonstrates that this movie is about fun as Kirk and McCoy run from volcano worshiping primitives while shouting funny dialog. Oddly, the sequence has nothing to do with the plot of the film except to set up Kirks character arc. Trekkies know that Starfleet officers swear to give up their lives to protect the development of alien worlds. Kirk? Well, he says it's no big deal! Hey, he's the captain(?). There's an attack on Starfleet next, then a trip to the Klingon homeworld (you spell it, I give up) and then things really get wild. Each action scene is clever and big, really big! Perhaps the only sequence that underwhelms is the climactic fight with Spock and, as is revealed by this time, Khan. Special mention for the 'we've lost gravity' sequence, which I thought was especially clever. Though I still can't really remember if Chekov, whos trepidation at putting on a red shirt was too funny, is actually alive!



The story's not just a corny mashup of ST:TWoK and Space Seed (!), it incorporates a twisty plot involving Adm. Marcus militarizing Starfleet, his daughter, Carol, sneaking around his plans (which is about the only real plothole in the film as her presence on Enterprise hardly seems explained) and how Harrison, who's revealed as Khan not even mid-way through, manipulates around what everyone else thinks is going on. Well, I say that's one plot hole but there is, sorta, another. To figure out just who this Khan guy is, when Kirk and Khan are off fighting Adm. Marcus, Spock, well, calls Spock! The film makes a great case that, perhaps, Khan isn't such a bad guy. And with Adm. Marcus shooting at Enterprise with his giant, dark, starship of death the film seems to have a real villain. Spock tells Spock, yea, Khan is a psycho. Which is a cop-out way of having Spock learn the truth about Khan. For Kirk, Khan's true nature is revealed in a terrific and bloody reveal when Khan drops all pretense and goes full murdering bad ass.



The cast just rocks! Good performances all around. Stand outs are Simon Pegg, who steals every scene he's in, and Zack Quinto. Every time Scotty is on screen is solid gold. Quinto's Spock, in a very real way, steals the film from Chris Pine's Kirk. If you didn't think Quinto was a good Spock in the last film I guarantee he'll prove himself a very worthy successor here. He really seems to have become comfortable in the role. There are some big emotions in the film but they fall into melodrama, even finding laugh out load moments. KHAAAAANNN!!! Need I say more? Really, should be writing Roger Corman a cheque man.



Make no mistake, if you were to apply actual logic to this film you'd be disappointed. And as for high concepts such as, oh, having the Berlin Wall come down in space, forget it. Nothing so high minded is here. The story and plot points are all summer flick action, mushy character arcs, and bits of Trek nostalgia frappaed into a cheese fest that goes by so fast you wouldn't particularly remember the last act. Rather like the first film, this one only makes sense because a character will explain why the action in the scene before last happened. No matter, it was fun getting there!



This film really did feel like Star Trek in that it was cheesy fun with a bit of conscious and character behind it. It's THAT sort of episode, so to speak. It's lacking actual intelligence and logic because, well, the characters, rather like in a Roger Corman flick, needed to be that dumb so they could walk into the plot. Watching Spock remind Kirk this is all incredibly illegal and dangerous to the entire galaxy while they go ahead and do it anyway might make a trekkie phaser their ears off. This film is what it is. This is The Doomsday Machine, not Return of the Archons.



Number of times a character says 'shit'? I count three times. Every film is improved with a colourful metaphor, if you ask me.



Cheers and set your phasers to fun! :rommie:

---

Plum
 
Last edited:
Re: STID - Plum's Review :)

And as for high concepts such as, oh, having the Berlin Wall come down in space, forget it. Nothing so high minded is here.

Heh. I found taking a stand on the morally distorted ways we're choosing to "fight terror" a lot more high minded - and gutsier - than Meyer's tired filing of the serial numbers off of recent events and pretending that it Meant Something.

Gor-kon? Really? :rolleyes:
 
Re: STID - Plum's Review :)

lol, right Gorby (Gorbachev). I gets ya. Good point too. I'm thinking I was unfair in saying it was a sub sub-plot.
 
Re: STID - Plum's Review :)

I expected the action to be relentless, but it wasn't. I'm glad they took their time early in the movie to set things up for later.
 
Re: STID - Plum's Review :)

Yea true RAMA, after the opening sequence we get the scene introducing Harrison, with the drama of curing the little girl (and providing a terrific ambiguity as to his motives from the start) to Kirk's character arc, including great scenes between Kirk and Adm. Pike that make his demise certainly the most dramatic scene in the film hands down.
 
Re: STID - Plum's Review :)

And as for high concepts such as, oh, having the Berlin Wall come down in space, forget it. Nothing so high minded is here.
They spent the first third of the film condemning the US' current use of drone warfare, calling it immoral and illegal.
 
Re: STID - Plum's Review :)

^^^
They did? Missed that somehow. Good on them then, and yea that would be a brave thing to say these days.
 
Re: STID - Plum's Review :)

One thing I gotta say, speaking of how logic can take a back seat in this flick, that I didn't really grok the references to the 'War on Terror'TM. Why? Well, because what Harrison does isn't an act of terrorism. His using Mickey, er, I mean the starfleet fellow with the sick daughter, to blow up that building isn't an act of terror. It's just a diversion. Terrorism requires a political motive, Harrison's are all personal. The Vengence ship crashing into the city was just murderous glee on his part too.

I do agree the film made some great comments about our fearful world today, just like all great Trek should. It did feel like the good ole days. But, it felt a bit off to me logically. Call it a nit-pick if you like. Come to think of it, weren't all the terrorism accusations coming from Adm. Marcus? He certainly is motivated to paint what happened, the explosion, in it's worst light.
 
I agree. ST09 was a great origins film but STID is the big screen treatment of TOS I've been waiting my whole life for.
 
Well, near as I can tell, without the restraint of the Vulcans being around, Section 31 is off being a "state within a state" and preparing the Federation for a "Preemptive War" against the Klingon Empire, which is becoming adventurous on its own.

Remember, almost ten years of Next Generation conditioned Trek Fans to thinking of the Klingons as our "Allies" against the Romulans. A lot of Trek people forgot about the Cold War of the "Sixties" era of Prime Kirk, Spock, and McCoy.

Lastly, didn't Khan crash the Vengeance into Embarcadero Square because he was aiming at Starfleet Headquarters? I mean, it's not like he was aiming at Candlestick Park cause he was a Raiders' fan left over from the 21st Century now, was he?
 
Since Scotty resumed his position as chief engineer by the end of the film, Chekov will almost certainly be in gold again for the next one.
 
I still think this universe is amazing where cadets can become captains and ensigns from the bridge can surpass senior engineering staff to become chief.

Ahhh, what the hell. Film was a great ride. Chekov's fourth wall breaking was subtle but done well.

Just need more Karl Urban next time please.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top