The War Doctor was actually introduced in The Name Of The Doctor
That's splitting hairs. Yes, the War Doctor first appeared in Name of the Doctor, but it was in a scene which was specifically set-up for Day of the Doctor.
But the point is that it wasn't until The Name Of The Doctor that Moffat had decided how to end Smith's era, it wasn't planned out years in advance.
Hopefully Capaldi will stay on beyond Moffat, we still haven't had a Doctor cross over 2 showrunners and I think it'd be interesting.
Well, we haven't since 1980. Hartnell went through three producers (Verity Lambert, John Wiles, Innes Lloyd), Troughton through two, essentially (Lloyd and Peter Bryant, and briefly Derrick Sherwin), and Tom Baker through three, essentially (Philip Hinchcliffe, Graham Williams, and John Nathan-Turner -- four if you count Barry Letts on "Robot").
I can't really distinguish the styles of Hartnell's and Troughton's producers from each other (I'd welcome others' insights on that), but I recall a distinct difference in the approaches of Tom Baker's three producers. Hinchcliffe was, of course, behind the "Gothic horror" era; Williams took the show in a more comic and cheesy direction and indulged Baker's clownish side (and I consider his tenure the worst in the franchise's history); and JNT made it more serious and slick, reined Baker in, and started introducing more story and character arcs, which continued into the rest of his long tenure. So changing producers/showrunners can change the Doctor.
It's interesting that the only two Who episodes he's ever written were co-written with RTD and Moffat (although we still don't know how much work Moffat did on Into the Dalek.)
I would love to see Drax again (even if he won't be played by the late Barry Jackson), and even though it won't happen in a million years, I would love to see Narvin (from Big Finish) to pop up.Lets face it: The Time Lords are a crap species. I mean, besides Romana, is there any other reason to bring back the Time Lords?
I certainly agree it's unfair to say Graham Williams' tenure is the worst (I love The Key to Time) but I also think it's unfair to dismiss JNT completely out of hand because of the costume alone. He did a lot of great things during his tenure, but also a lot of rubbish. His tenure was so long, that you have to break it up into eras, too. I think mid-Sixth to mid-Seventh is the lowest point for the show.Yeah, and I am not sure Graham Williams is worse than JNT in the latter's collective contribution to the show. For insisting on Sixth's awful constume alone, I'd wager JNT is worse.
I can't really distinguish the styles of Hartnell's and Troughton's producers from each other (I'd welcome others' insights on that),
Yeah, thats more fair. Thanks for correcting me.I would love to see Drax again (if he won't be played by the late Barry Jackson), and even though it won't happen in a million years, I would love to see Narvin (from Big Finish) to pop up.Lets face it: The Time Lords are a crap species. I mean, besides Romana, is there any other reason to bring back the Time Lords?
That being said, I do agree that the Time Lords as a whole are difficult to work with (both in and out of universe), but I contend that they can work with the right kind of writing (see Big Finish's Gallifrey, for instance). I think it's a mistake to dismiss them out of hand simply because of past mistakes.
I certainly agree it's unfair to say Graham Williams' tenure is the worst (I love The Key to Time) but I also think it's unfair to dismiss JNT completely out of hand because of the costume alone. He did a lot of great things during his tenure, but also a lot of rubbish. His tenure was so long, that you have to break it up into eras, too. I think mid-Sixth to mid-Seventh is the lowest point for the show.Yeah, and I am not sure Graham Williams is worse than JNT in the latter's collective contribution to the show. For insisting on Sixth's awful constume alone, I'd wager JNT is worse.
I certainly agree it's unfair to say Graham Williams' tenure is the worst (I love The Key to Time) but I also think it's unfair to dismiss JNT completely out of hand because of the costume alone. He did a lot of great things during his tenure, but also a lot of rubbish. His tenure was so long, that you have to break it up into eras, too. I think mid-Sixth to mid-Seventh is the lowest point for the show.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.