Does this type of event enter into the series often? The lack of pinpoint accuracy, for a better reason, or was this one Rose's fault that they landed in 1860 Cardiff?they were intending to arrive in Naples, but got the wrong year and the wrong country.
Bob's yer uncle!Perhaps after I pick me up some chips.
It happens quite often. There's a fan theory that sometimes the TARDIS goes where The Doctor is needed, rather than where The Doctor tells it to.Does this type of event enter into the series often? The lack of pinpoint accuracy, for a better reason, or was this one Rose's fault that they landed in 1860 Cardiff?they were intending to arrive in Naples, but got the wrong year and the wrong country.
It's a plot device that I am totally onboard with.It happens quite often. There's a fan theory that sometimes the TARDIS goes where The Doctor is needed, rather than where The Doctor tells it to.Does this type of event enter into the series often? The lack of pinpoint accuracy, for a better reason, or was this one Rose's fault that they landed in 1860 Cardiff?they were intending to arrive in Naples, but got the wrong year and the wrong country.
Well you kinda have to be onboard with that sort of stuff to really enjoy WhoIt's a plot device that I am totally onboard with.It happens quite often. There's a fan theory that sometimes the TARDIS goes where The Doctor is needed, rather than where The Doctor tells it to.Does this type of event enter into the series often? The lack of pinpoint accuracy, for a better reason, or was this one Rose's fault that they landed in 1860 Cardiff?![]()
Eeeeeexactly.Well you kinda have to be onboard with that sort of stuff to really enjoy Who![]()
And we love it that way.The TARDIS is kind of like the Millenium Falcon or Serenity-it's sort of a beat-up, old and outdated ship that doesn't always work. The reason it's a police box is because of this; the "Chameleon circuit" (Which allows the TARDIS's shape to adapt to it's surroundigns) broke.
The Doctor has attempted to fix it twice in the classic series, but by the time of the new series he's really come to accept the shape.
Good analogies on those other two vehicles. When the Doctor was getting Rose to decide where/when she'd like to go, I got the impression that the TARDIS was indeed old tech. A sort of lovable old junker akin to those great, beat-up old ships we couldn't dream of ever being without. And this notion that he stole it.... now that's a sweet little appetizer!!The TARDIS is kind of like the Millenium Falcon or Serenity-it's sort of a beat-up, old and outdated ship that doesn't always work. The reason it's a police box is because of this; the "Chameleon circuit" (Which allows the TARDIS's shape to adapt to it's surroundigns) broke.
If Gwyneth died the moment she stepped under that arch, was it her actual spirit that was talking to Rose and the Doctor? Imploring them to let her finish her work?
Doctor Who, and especially the new series, is meant to be enjoyed by a wide audience, so no, in my opinion, there are no caveats, no initiation rituals, no special handshakes. There are a couple of episodes which are a bit controversial within fandom, but there's really no way to know if you'll enjoy them or not, so I don't think any warning is in order.Incidentally, I'd like to know if you all have any caveats for watching Doctor Who. For example, are there any particular episodes you feel are atypical in quality or some other such element? What about how to refer to any particular character?
RE: the comment on the special effects. I just could not find the right way to describe it. What I meant was that there wasn't an over-reliance on the "gee whiz" factor or scenes to imply "see what we can do with our new toys?" In fact, I rather liked it because I was aware of the original series reputation for low budget in areas like that. It seems to me to be a nice way to evoke the original show while still breaking new ground.
Incidentally, I'd like to know if you all have any caveats for watching Doctor Who. For example, are there any particular episodes you feel are atypical in quality or some other such element? What about how to refer to any particular character?
I do not mind spoilers, so no worries on that front. Well, unless there is something of special power and impact, that is so much more effective if you see it "first-hand".
Hm, could you refresh my memory? I definitely caught the ones in "The Shakespeare Code," but I'm drawing a blank with any references in this episode.The End Of The World [...] has two Harry Potter references in it...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.