No way STC would start something like that. Rabble-rousing is the opposite of their style.Both RMB and TrekMovie have tried to imply on Twitter that it's actually STC that's behind the petition, but it appears it's a fan that's organized it.
No way STC would start something like that. Rabble-rousing is the opposite of their style.Both RMB and TrekMovie have tried to imply on Twitter that it's actually STC that's behind the petition, but it appears it's a fan that's organized it.
It's a damned shame Vic isn't the public face of fan productions.Here's TrekZone's interview with Vic Mignogna, covering his career, STC, and the Axanar lawsuit:
having now seen him speak on Axanr, its a crying shame this guy is not the public face of the Star Trek fan films, speaks very well, speaks with a passion, his history with Star Trek is great, how he funds the series is great.
He may not be able to go on a Late Night show, but he could discuss things on the likes of Collider or Screen Junkies
It's a damned shame Vic isn't the public face of fan productions.
they may well, but at that stage they are right back where they start, with a fan film community who for the most part is well behaved, and one bad apple, those guidelines have come to nothing, other than to shut down the bad apple, which they could do anyways, without these guidelines.
I think the very best case we can expect is for Continues to be allowed to release Embrace the Winds, Vic says its finished in the video (even if its not totally finished), I think CBS / Paramount would benefit from letting any productions that are either finished or very late in the process be released, so as not to cause further upset amongst fans towards them.It makes it easier to shut down bad apple's in the future, with a legal precedent. Just because they choose not to go after other's, is entirely their perogatory. Its a slim chance, but its a chance.
Why should Continues get special treatment while others suffer? Very un-Roddenberry
They at least went through the trouble of becoming an IRS-approved charity, which means if nothing else it's significantly harder for the people to involved to make any profit off it. (Not that I think Vic & Co. would have tried to anyways).
Why should Continues get special treatment while others suffer? Very un-Roddenberry
this is a very well written "At this time, I have no comment".Given all the hand wringing Vic's composure gives me a sliver of hope.
CBS said "If you follow these guidelines, we promise not to sue you." They said nothing about applying those guidelines to current series... they said nothing about applying those guidelines to everyone at all, frankly.
This whole thing is absurd.
CBS said "If you follow these guidelines, we promise not to sue you." They said nothing about applying those guidelines to current series... they said nothing about applying those guidelines to everyone at all, frankly. There is nothing - ZERO, NADA - that CBS said which even remotely implies that current fan series in production WILL be shut down if they don't follow all the guidelines.
As for the nonsensical theories about how "CBS has to apply their rules equally to all fan films or Axanar will use it as a defense", please see the case law established in Paramount Pictures v. Carol Publishing, 25 F. Supp. 2d 372 S.D.N.Y. 1998.
(Summary: Copyright holders can pick and chose where, and with whom, they enforce their copyrights. They can give "special treatment" to anyone they choose, and it can't be used against them in court. It's their intellectual property.)
Even Buzzed reported a couple days ago, when asked whether the guidelines would apply to current ongoing fan series in production, CBS wouldn't comment.
Read between the lines, people. I think reports of fan films' deaths are greatly exaggerated.
Time will tell if any longtime Trek fan film producers are interested in testing your legal theories regarding these new guidelines.
Which could be happening quietly behind-the-scenes or some discussions to that effect.When the lawsuit first came down on Axanar a lot of us predicted that all the major shows that had taken in big crowdfunding would also get lawsuits or at least a C&D. Now some fans are interpreting that non-action amounts to silent consent? Well, it's much harder to view it that way in lieu of the guidelines. They are living on borrowed time and the only way I'd proceed if I were in their shoes is if I got some sort of official reassurance from CBS/P.
Copyright or trademark law hasn't changed in any way after CBS/P released their guidelines . . . Cautious producers of other fan films had either known or listened carefully before when being contacted by CBS/P what can or can't be done. They won't just have to vanish into thin air by the strong will of the IP holders. Those rightful IP holders still reserve their right of what can continue and what can not. No more, no less.
Let's wait for the real outcome instead of the outcry.
(But that wouldn't fill our threads, would it? ;-) )
I'm seeing a common misconception among various people that the guidelines are various things that they are not. They are not a threat to sue if a filmmaker does not comply with them. They are not a threat to sue if a filmmaker affirmatively does anything that is prohibited by the guidelines. Finally, they are not even "rules" to which there is any stated consequence if they are broken.
They are, merely, exactly what they say they are: guidelines which, if a filmmaker follows all of them, he or she can consider himself or herself free from the threat of a lawsuit by the studio. However, there is no corresponding statement – express or implied – in the guidelines that there is automatically any punitive consequence to not following the guidelines. The Studio may object or it may not. The only clear consequence from not following any of the guidelines is that the studio has not affirmatively told you that they will not object to your production. That's it.
The guidelines simply provide a safe harbor if you follow all of them – but they do not in any way constitue a threat of - or grounds for - liability if you do not. It is strictly the choice of the filmmaker as to whether it wants to follow the stated conditions and avail itself of the safe harbor that is being offered.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.