• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Starship Size Argument™ thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is an internet forum. Might I suggest it's not entirely unexpected people might raise old topics.
Star Trek is an old topic; Khan's Chest is an old topic; blue warp nacelles are an old topic. Captain Robau's badassery is an old topic.

There's "old topic", and then there's played out and busted. Bernd Schneider is the latter.
 
That length just sits well with me since I personally don't like the 725 or whatever measurement since its just to darn big for that era.. again, personal opinion, and I don't judge anybody for believing any differently.

But we really don't know if it's too big for the era, because we only ever saw one ship from that era.
 
Still talking about the size? Hmm..
My "Personal" opinion, and I honestly don't care about anybody else s, since.. It doesn't matter a whole lot.. I'm just adding my 2 cents!
I believe in the 345m length, and that the "Shuttle bay" is just like all most all the other shuttle bays in Star trek! There Magic! Like Voyagers and Defiants! Ha!! That length just sits well with me since I personally don't like the 725 or whatever measurement since its just to darn big for that era.. again, personal opinion, and I don't judge anybody for believing any differently.

Yeah, although I'm not too fussed either way, we have waved shuttlebays away before as magic shuttlebays, i.e. Voyager.

Anyway, let's wait for Beyond - it will probably give more evidence of a 725m ship I'm guessing, but you never know.
 
Still talking about the size? Hmm..
My "Personal" opinion, and I honestly don't care about anybody else s, since.. It doesn't matter a whole lot.. I'm just adding my 2 cents!
I believe in the 345m length, and that the "Shuttle bay" is just like all most all the other shuttle bays in Star trek! There Magic! Like Voyagers and Defiants! Ha!! That length just sits well with me since I personally don't like the 725 or whatever measurement since its just to darn big for that era.. again, personal opinion, and I don't judge anybody for believing any differently.
That's fair enough.

Unfortunately in this case it is not a question of belief or the need for justification, the ship is 725m long, not maybe, not perhaps but a few still seem to be in denial about it.

When the first film was released there was room for people believing what they wanted as it was not certain at the time and brand new, after 6 years of investigation and even more new evidence in the trailers that time has most definitely passed.

Some think if they whine enough or setup embarrassing Facebook pages it will somehow alter reality in the way they want.

It's all rather ridiculous to me.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Looks like the edge of the saucer is two decks tall in this latest teaser.

Looks like 3 or 4 to me. The windows are just on every other deck.
 
So there's no room for Jefferies tubes and such then?
I think there is, if by "Jefrries tubes" you mean this:
thefinalfrontier0726.jpg


There's room for a WHOLE DECK between those windows. Going by the xbox/ps3 game, though, I think that the deck structure of this Enterprise doesn't have the 3 meter layer cake concept we're used to; I actually think each "deck" is a habitable space about 6 or 7 meters high, containing corridors and rooms, air ducts and cable trunking in the floors and ceilings, high bays and low bays for some labs and machine spaces, water pumps, heating and cooling equipment, etc. IOW the main reason for the deck structure is probably the fact that THIS Enterprise does not have paper-thin floors and ceilings and that the space between one deck and the next is packed with equipment.
 
I think there is, if by "Jefrries tubes" you mean this:
thefinalfrontier0726.jpg


There's room for a WHOLE DECK between those windows. Going by the xbox/ps3 game, though, I think that the deck structure of this Enterprise doesn't have the 3 meter layer cake concept we're used to; I actually think each "deck" is a habitable space about 6 or 7 meters high, containing corridors and rooms, air ducts and cable trunking in the floors and ceilings, high bays and low bays for some labs and machine spaces, water pumps, heating and cooling equipment, etc. IOW the main reason for the deck structure is probably the fact that THIS Enterprise does not have paper-thin floors and ceilings and that the space between one deck and the next is packed with equipment.
I was going to respond with the same but decided to wait until the film was released as someone will bring it up again next week as if they have had some sort of revelation and found the holy grail.

Confirmation bias is alive and well once again.

All they have to do is look at the depth of the saucer at the edge and the teeny tiny people in the windows as King Daniel already pointed out.
 
We saw the size of the deck thickness in STID, when they walk through the centre atrium set. It was not more than a couple of feet
 
When is the NuEnt not huge?

All it takes is to have some decks without windows, which are hardly a neccessity.
 
All it takes is to have some decks without windows, which are hardly a neccessity.

But we've seen a "cutaway" of the saucer on screen; there is no room for full decks without windows (see below). They'd have to be crawl spaces, e.g. TNG style Jefferies' Tubes.

The image we see of "tiny" people in the windows in the Beyond preview is not the same scale as the ship below, if those really are "tiny" people....

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top