I feel like a producer somewhere is saying "Damn" in awe somewhere. Lol.But that's 48 frames to obsess over at standard HD resolution.![]()
I feel like a producer somewhere is saying "Damn" in awe somewhere. Lol.But that's 48 frames to obsess over at standard HD resolution.![]()
No, but they could have had some expository dialogue that would have covered the same beats.The footage from ‘The Cage’ was used because there was no reason for them to mimic-reshoot those scenes with the production values they currently had, because the original footage made the point they wanted to make. There was no larger meaning to it than that.
Star Trek ship
![]()
No, but they could have had some expository dialogue that would have covered the same beats.
They chose to use the The Cage footage because it was a sequel to that episode.
Those aren't Star Trek ships then...That doesn’t look like the Reliant. Or the Defiant. Or the Nebula. Or the Akira. Or the Saber. Or the Steamrunner. Or the Constellation. Or the Sagan. Or the Prometheus. Or the Dauntless. Or the…
![]()
They did a lot of vfx work and fan films. The prequels were hard and the Clone Wars was too far for them.
Star Trek was similarly treated.
I'll give you the Defiant. The others are spear carriers.That doesn’t look like the Reliant. Or the Defiant. Or the Nebula. Or the Akira. Or the Saber. Or the Steamrunner. Or the Constellation. Or the Sagan. Or the Prometheus. Or the Dauntless. Or the…
![]()
Yeah things are exaggered and stylised in different ways to suit the animation, the proportions are stretched, details are simplified, but the designs underneath are basically the same. They're drawing from the same imaginary reality. Each is an impression of the same Platonic ideal forms.Clone Wars and Rebels really don't.
The lightsabers are super skinny, Vader is angular and thinner, troopers...just weirder. It is all very quaint. Now, it is all an homage to the original concept art of Ralph Macquarrie but it is actually very different. And Resistance went full strange 80s cel shading with heavy borders. So no. And it has created quite the kerfuffle over skinny and pointed versus "regular" sabers. But no one says one is replacing the other.
It implies nothingSo now that both designs have shown up in shiny modern live-action series Star Trek: Picard, it implies that the SNW ship gets a refit to become the TOS ship. Either way TOS leads to TNG leads to Voyager leads to Picard. In story, in design, in visuals. SNW can go be off in its own little universe for all I care, as long as it doesn't suggest that the visuals I'm seeing in my TOS and TNG DVDs are wrong. Well aside from the horrible colours and NTSC artefacts and man I should've gotten the Blurays instead...
Oh look, it's those idiots again.TrekYards boys talks about the differences between the New Jersey and the TOS Connie.
TrekYards boys talks...
Nope. Right now It's just a different artistic interpretation.it implies that the SNW ship gets a refit to become the TOS ship.
Nothing ever suggested that.as long as it doesn't suggest that the visuals I'm seeing in my TOS and TNG DVDs are wrong.
Give it time.Except for the guy who hates the thin lightsabers, I don't think they'll even know joy.
So now that both designs have shown up in shiny modern live-action series Star Trek: Picard, it implies that the SNW ship gets a refit to become the TOS ship.
If these two ships can be the same ship...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.