Spoilers Starship Design in Star Trek: Picard

Discussion in 'Star Trek: Picard' started by pst, Jan 9, 2020.

  1. KamenRiderBlade

    KamenRiderBlade Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    I see it as more of a reflection of the modern day Naval Ship design.

    BattleShips / BattleCruisers are obsolete.

    The Cruiser is the king of Ship Types and given the advantage of FirePower and Modern Weaponry, Cruisers offer that balance of Size, Power, Defense, and Quantity.
     
    fireproof78 likes this.
  2. Dukhat

    Dukhat Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    I never had Gul Dukat as my avatar. I had Dukhat from Babylon 5.

    And to my knowledge, there is no canon energy limitations for Transwarp anything.
     
  3. Arpy

    Arpy Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2001
    I think it prudent to remember the conceit of Star Trek. That it's navy ships on the Final Frontier. It may be a victim of its own imaginings here with us who keep track of them. It has more modes of propulsion and weapons and so on than it makes adequate use of. But maybe it does not make use of them because they're so far past the Final Frontier. Trek inspires us to get out there, but easy jumps here and there, and there and here not being all that bizarre, makes the overall pursuit less enticing than exploring inwardly the depths of cyberspace and other Earthly wonders we're more excited about today.

    Plus, we're well past the need for the kind of naval warfare Trek presents. Galactica is an aircraft carrier, and maybe the next big sci-fi figures out how to make drone-strikes interesting. By the time we get into real space, it's going to be AI probes doing the Trek stuff. Trek does cruisers and warp because it's good camp fun.
     
  4. Arpy

    Arpy Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2001
    On trans-warp beaming specifically, if it were possible for one guy to do it a century earlier, whole civilizations would pour surreal resources into making it [near] commonplace by the 24th-25th centuries. And it would be used more in the 23rd too. That's an arms-race if I ever heard of one. It's a game-changer. At least these other transwarp techs have the benefit of being from far off or opaque civilizations. Even for those I can imagine a series of novels about the great crusade by different local powers to acquire them.

    And I can see how a 25th/26th Century series could use, say, quantum coaxial slipstream transwarp (again, often shortened to "warp") to get to different parts of the galaxy that would have taken decades in the 23rd/24th centuries but still ultimately tell the same kinds of stories -- ships going into deep space, new worlds around every corner, etc. I feel like a galaxy-spanning Federation always has to be a century or three just ahead of us. Or until we discover warp in the real world and need a new "Final Frontier."
     
    Last edited: Apr 3, 2020
  5. Tarek71

    Tarek71 Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2007
    Location:
    Asgard
    Well JJ and his current and former people came in. For various reasons they decided on prequels. Simultaneously they wanted to introduce new tech. So rather than wait for 2399 to bring in time travel suits, interstellar beaming and instantaneous jump drive over 50,000 light years, they decided to say that the Federation of the 2250s can do these things.

    My rationalization was that the Borg bodies and Borg wreckage from ENT "Regeneration" are studied for decades after, and over time, radical breakthroughs occur thru reverse engineering and research. ST: FC and "Regernation" changed the timeline. And that is the changed timeline that JJTrek and Disco exist within. That would be an easy, breezy thing to establish if they wanted to.
     
  6. KamenRiderBlade

    KamenRiderBlade Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    Even better =D

    Not in TV/Movie cannon, but for Transwarp Beaming, it was limitations set in the Novel. And it's not a "Hard Limit" so much as the energy requirements for Transwarp Beaming "1 person" is ridiculous compared to just moving a StarShip and it's contents to the destination, and strain on existing reactors for one high energy burst for "Transwarp Beaming" is ridiculously high.

    That's the problem with Khan MacGyvering his solutions.
     
  7. Timo

    Timo Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    Then again, it's not just a matter of rationalizing why the Federation gets to develop its own high tech at timepoint T1 instead of T2. It's an uphill battle, up the slippery vertical face of Matterhorn without an ice pick no less, to rationalize why the Federation doesn't yet possess the godlike technology it could get from all the gods of Star Trek.

    Somebody else in the Trek universe has already invented everything and then some. And our heroes get to meet this somebody easily enough. Ever since the adventures of Kirk, they find fallen gods who could easily be robbed of their divine technology. They interact with their betters in many other ways, too, sometimes even merging with them. So what happens to all the tech they meet? Some they could just pilfer. Some they might reverse engineer. Some they might be inspired to develop on their own when they see it in action. But they just plain don't.

    An internal mechanism where high tech gets suppressed, more or less successfully, to protect the Federation from itself... Is surprisingly appealing. Call it S31 or whatever. But postulating that it exists is a pretty good idea in the end!

    Timo Saloniemi
     
  8. KamenRiderBlade

    KamenRiderBlade Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    The thing about the "Final Frontier" and space is that space is expanding constantly. and we need newer faster methods of FTL just to keep pace, if we intend to cross the vast cosmos, especially between galaxies, we're going to need it. There are also multiple dimensions / parallel universe, time travel to the past to learn from it, time travel to the future and setup structure to make sure the UFP stays around for as long as possible. Time Travel will help with that so that we ensure that the UFP lineage is intact for millenia to come.
     
  9. KamenRiderBlade

    KamenRiderBlade Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    I think it's more of budget / VFX issue / not pushing the timeline foreward past the 24th century.

    We know that by the 31st Century, Time Pod's can literally be like the TARDIS where it's bigger on the inside then on the outside.

    https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Earth_vessel_(31st_century)

    But that technology doesn't appear until way into the future.
     
  10. Arpy

    Arpy Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2001
    Section 31 is supposed to be secret...at least in some time periods -- I've lost track of when to care about that part. This would require a specific Technological Directive or something. Otherwise, there'd be too many questions. But even then, that's the Federation. Why haven't the Klingons made use of some forgotten Metron stronghold to conquer half the galaxy? Or even the Andorians? Absolute power having the tendency to corrupt, and all that. Even Section 31. This would be their Prime Directive: to seek out such technology for the Federation. Or to conquer it themselves. Because they care, of course.

    I guess I just think Trek is about more local space exploration to appeal to our real world yearning to get out there in a (somewhat) realistic way. Once we go Galactic Federation, I think it passes a certain threshold of real world general appeal. The tales you start to tell then are Star Wars or Asimov's Foundation. Right now, you can constantly re-stage Trek with a new century and a new frontier. I think at the next level you have to reinvent it to explore other galaxies and universe.

    Though, you know what? Maybe a Galactic Federation Trek wouldn't be so bad. If it flops or if you want to re-stage it on a smaller scale again in the following series, you could set it in a parallel universe. But maybe the way the world is now, with any country or destination easy enough to get to by the masses (via airplane or instagram), maybe a Trek series exploring different kinds of stories would be interesting in its own way. JJ basically did that with Khan transporting from Earth to Kronos and Kirk calling Scotty back on Earth in real time, anyway.
     
  11. Viper78

    Viper78 Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2013
    Location:
    Scotland
    I don't want to go off topic here but I don't agree with the F35 being the 2nd best dogfighter in the world. It is a jack of all trades which is why the Royal Navy have it as a replacement for the Harrier, the RAF have it as a Stealth Strike aircraft replacing the Tornado fighter bomber and not as an Air Superiority fighter, the truth is the Eurofighter Typhoon is a dedicated Dogfighter and the best in the world at it. That is why it is still being produced and upgraded with the latest tech. I think the F35 would struggle against a few of the worlds leading fighters in a dogfight, both the F22 and F35 have been designed for stealth rather than dedicated dogfighting.

    Back to Starships, I'd always thought of the Intrepid class as designed as Starfleets primary multi purpose vessel.
     
    Last edited: Apr 3, 2020
  12. Timo

    Timo Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    I'd think the exact opposite. Never tell the legislators. If they were let in on it, then there would be questions. You need to assassinate or mindwipe the inventors and discoverers in complete secrecy and always make it look like an accident.

    Automatic self-regulation? If you do adopt the supertech, you die. Give General Denning all the secrets of Quark's Treasure, and mankind eliminates itself in the sixties already. Allow Bruut, Son of B'loode, to make use of the Gripping Hand his ship confiscated from Goddess Athene, and the Empire strangles itself in no time flat. Or then the Cabal of Civilized Beings Everywhere intervenes, and the Klingon Empire is ground to pulp by the alliance of Feds, Romulans, Breen and Cardassians who think they are fighting for a different reason altogether.

    I don't really see the difference. Kirk already encountered the fantastic: gods, empires and weird phenomena that challenge some basic assumptions of ours. What more could a wider-ranging setting ever offer? Nothing about this "tighter" Trek has created the impression that the outer space wonders actually matter back home: they are far away and stay far away. Going multigalactic would just sustain that.

    Timo Saloniemi
     
  13. Arpy

    Arpy Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2001
    Wouldn't that mean killing nearly every hero ship we've had? And lots of others throughout the galaxy? I think 31 are too busy modeling their leather jackets in the mirror to reach that far.

    That works once or twice or a few times more, but not every time. We've come across a lot of advanced tech over the years, and those are only the stories we've seen.

    I dunno. I think you may dumb space down more going that way. Suddenly you're traveling 80 galaxies to the left and 900 south weekly, and, it's like, we haven't even set foot on the moon in fifty years and it turns out we're woefully unprepared for a pandemic that could take us out in the next decade or two. Galactic civilization? Come on. Plus, Trek is already pushing it with warp getting us to local stars fast as it has (and the times have gotten shorter as we've gotten more spoiled and impatient), and now we're transwarping across the known universe? I guess I wish that we could make its vastness seem more so somehow.
     
  14. KamenRiderBlade

    KamenRiderBlade Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    In my Head Cannon, I've already did the math for traveling to one of the closer Galaxies near by and start exploring.
    - 2,500,000 LY to the Andromeda Galaxy in a Non-Stop straight trip, realistically, it's not possible to perform in one straight line due to engine limitations for sustained output and needing breaks / cool down / various resource limitations / etc

    But if you use all my existing FTL tech that StarFleet has access to:
    Safest Method, but Slower
    ~ 4,171.9 days via Warp Drive @ WF 40 ~= 11.422 Gregorian Years
    ~ __225.4 days via TransWarp Drive @ WF 96
    ~ ___46.644 days via Quantum SlipStream Drive @ WF 154
    ~ ___10.629 days via CoAxial Warp Drive @ WF 240
    ~ ____2.297 days via Graviton Catapult @ WF 380
    ~ ____9.958 hours via DASH Drive @ WF 635
    ~ ____2.5 secs - 1 min via QUAHSSI-Driver System@ WF 11,214
    Riskiest, but Faster

    Realistically, we'll use one of the middle FTL options like CoAxial Warp Drive, since the Risk isn't nearly as high as some of the faster methods due to the Pros/Cons of each system, especially with resource / range issues.

    For those who are fans of the ST: Discovery, the DASH (Displacement-Activated Spore-Hub) Drive is the official term, the colloquiel term is "Spore Drive". Even then, that's a long time to spend within the "Mycelial Network" just to get to another Galaxy. And there are various limits as to why we can't just jump in a "Straight Line".
     
    Last edited: Apr 3, 2020
  15. Arpy

    Arpy Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2001
    ^ Semi off-topic, but did you ever watch B5? One of the things I liked about that show is how different alien techs are from one another, and how not so easily compatible. Many of them employ different types of engines and cores and they all use unknown ancient alien jump gate technology for their primary long-range travel.
     
  16. KamenRiderBlade

    KamenRiderBlade Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    Yeah, I've watched it several times over and watched it with friends. I own the entire collection on DVD.
     
    Arpy likes this.
  17. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    Pretty much sums up my feelings.
    I would agree with that though I think DSC and Kelvin Trek are branches within that branch.

    But, that's temporal mechanics. ;)
     
  18. Tuskin38

    Tuskin38 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    So Chabon apparently told Jörg Hillebrand (for use on Memory-Alpha) that there were three classes of ships approved for the battle. Though based on the descriptions he gave, only one, with some variations, made it in the final episode.

    https://twitter.com/gaghyogi49/status/1246552176975122438

    [​IMG]
     
    NCC-73515, Sci, Tim Thomason and 6 others like this.
  19. 137th Gebirg

    137th Gebirg Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2000
    Location:
    Eaten by Cannibals
    VERY cool - many times likes - bookmarking that one. Glad the class name kerfuffle has been straightened out. That can safely place the Ibn Majid back into the Curiosity class and call it a day.
     
    NCC-73515, Timo, DEWLine and 3 others like this.
  20. Dukhat

    Dukhat Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    He’s probably referring to these two ships, which again were also old designs Eaves made for some video game:

    https://i.imgur.com/E80dlXH_d.jpg?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium