Man that outer hull around the bridge looks paper thin. You'd think there would be some extra armor plating or at least a double hull for some protection on such a critical part of the ship.
I thought the bridge was fine; it was the forwardmost sections of the saucer that were breached.Wasn't there also a bridge blowout in Nemesis?
How often has a bridge actually taken direct damage (not exploding consoles - something that breached the hull)?Here I thought this was going to be a thread about why the most important part of the ship is exposed like a hood ornament.
"Year of Hell" and the Abrams movie are the only examples that I can think of off the top of my head. 99% of the time, the shields and hull (and plot armor) do a good enough job of protecting the bridge from damage. Burying it deeper in the hull would be pointless from a design perspective, and detrimental from a dramatic one.
(And if you're a believer in replaceable bridge modules, burying it would complicate or prevent those.)
[Bridge]
KIRK: Lieutenant Palmer.
PALMER: I can't raise the Constellation, sir. I'm still getting the distress beacon, but there's heavy subspace interference. It's almost blocking the signal.
KIRK: Keep trying. Mister Spock, full evaluation of the damage to the Constellation.
SPOCK: All power plants dead, reserve energy banks operative at a very low power level.
KIRK: Life support systems?
SPOCK: Also operative at a low power level. The entire Bridge is damaged and uninhabitable. The rest of the ship seems able to sustain life.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.