Just as the only thing that really differentiated Enterprise from 24th century Star Trek was the terminology. "Phase cannons" instead of "phasers". "Polarize the hull plating" instead of "raise the shields".
News Starfleet Academy Coming to P+
- Thread starter Tuskin38
- Start date
Some people only feel alive when they dislike and fight against something else.
Which has not been expressed to those fans who like Discovery.
I am going to infiltrate the labyrinthine organization of Love Stupids disguised as a social media manager and janitor. With my shaolin skills and the power of my mind and gloved hands I will copy their plans and then hire even more social media managers of my own, and a wizard and form Stupiscorp International Conglomerataed, a registered Sealand Corporation in fact I already did, and no one can stop me from making sure that Space Acadamy gets made, but in the past where they can't stop it from happening, and anyway Doohan has agreed to star in it.
I have a few mission statements...
1. If you immediately know the candlelight is fire, then the meal was cooked a long time ago.
2. One man's ceiling is another man's floor.
3. Never run with... scissors?
4. When a father and son do not speak, it means... there is trouble between them.
How could that be? It would be a direct violation of the True Spirit of Star Trek as expressed in the core principles of Luve Stupis.
getting away from the lovedoofus stuff and on to something more serious,
Academy could do well to have someone that has experience both as an actor with a legacy in Star Trek, experience as an actual instructor, so bringing that to the mix, the knowledge of a stage director AND the omniscient powers of a being of pure energy. I really do hope they consider Brian Brophy for a role.
Academy could do well to have someone that has experience both as an actor with a legacy in Star Trek, experience as an actual instructor, so bringing that to the mix, the knowledge of a stage director AND the omniscient powers of a being of pure energy. I really do hope they consider Brian Brophy for a role.
It would be only fitting, as Robau is going to be the chancellor.
This is 2023. Sadly I just turn on the news and see things even stupider than this every day so it can be hard to tell sometimes.
Either 2025 or late 2024, it shoots next year.
I understand that the world can seem overwhelming and full of issues that might be more pressing than a campaign for a TV show. However, it's not fair to dismiss the "Stop Luve Stupis" campaign as "stupid" just because it doesn't align with your own priorities. Everyone has their passions and interests, and for some, Star Trek holds a special place in their hearts.
Starting a campaign is not an easy task, especially in a world where self-expression and personal projects are often met with ridicule and dismissal. It takes courage and determination to put oneself out there, knowing that others might not share the same enthusiasm or viewpoint. We're not asking everyone to agree with us, but we do hope for a bit of open-mindedness and understanding.
We're all entitled to our opinions and passions, and it's important to remember that what might seem trivial to you could hold great significance for others. So, instead of brushing off the campaign as "stupid," let's try to respect and appreciate the diversity of interests and ideas that make our world interesting.
You mean the diversity of complaints.
This is not a campaign. This is one person complaining.
Okay, maybe two.
And no, it's not a trickle before the flood. Don't even try that feint.
Understanding of what here? This is a claim to speak for what Star Trek means to all fans and to speak on behalf of everyone. That's the height of arrogance in terms of what the Academy show might be. It doesn't respect other possible points of view of what Trek can mean, nor does it explore what the 32nd century could offer in the terms of potential exploration.
In short, it creates a very small focused idea of Star Trek and says "This is the only right way," and couches it in religious and spiritual language to make that sound more right.
How is this being respectful of other points of view?
Beyond here I don't see this chatted about elsewhere.
I clearly understand. This is a waste of everybody's time.
How bored are you?!?
Either that or you have a bad trip...
You're right. What's another word for stupid?
Your campaign is dense, foolish, halfwitted, idiotic, imbecilic, doltish, dumb, thickheaded, daft, scatterbrained, nonsensical, unwise, absurd, ludicrous, asinine, cock-eyed, zany, and futile.
To name a few.
Last edited:
Wow, it's disheartening to see such a harsh and dismissive response. I put a lot of effort into the campaign, and to see it labeled with so many derogatory terms feels incredibly disheartening. I understand that not everyone will agree with the campaign's goals, but I had hoped for a more respectful and open-minded dialogue.
The "Stop Luve Stupis" campaign is meant to be inclusive and respectful of all opinions. We're not trying to exclude anyone or force our views on others. Instead, we aim to create a space where fans can come together and express their thoughts and concerns about the future of Star Trek, particularly the new Starfleet Academy show set in the 32nd century.
I wish you could see the campaign for what it truly is: a gathering of passionate fans who care deeply about the Star Trek franchise and want to ensure it remains true to its core values. It's disheartening that my efforts to unite fans and create a platform for discussion are met with such negativity.
I hope that, in the future, we can engage in more constructive conversations that foster understanding and empathy, rather than resorting to name-calling and dismissive language. We all have a right to express our opinions, but let's try to do so in a way that promotes dialogue and connection rather than division and hostility.
Similar threads
