There’ll be a field trip to see it. Second semester.
News Starfleet Academy Coming to P+
- Thread starter Tuskin38
- Start date
"The greatest officer in Starfleet history."
"Legend has it he was a union man."
"And he loved daerts."
"JAYSUS."
"Legend has it he was a union man."
"And he loved daerts."
"JAYSUS."
Yes! Exactly what I wanted! I wrote out my whole idea for it like 400 posts ago, and I'll die on my hill that it's a better era to explore, tho clearly I'm in the minority. So bring on the 32nd century. I'll give anything a chance
Sneak peak of my next blog post
Starfleet Academy Spinoff: A Storm is Brewing Over Discovery's Worst-Rated Episode
The upcoming Star Trek: Starfleet Academy show has already sparked a wave of controversy and heated debates among fans. Set to be a spinoff of Star Trek: Discovery's poorly received episode S04E04 "All is Possible," the series has left fans questioning the direction the franchise is taking. As the "Stop Luve Stupis" campaign gains traction, Twitter users are losing their cool, with many criticizing the new show set in the 32nd century.
"All is Possible," the foundation for the Starfleet Academy spinoff, has been widely criticized for its lackluster plot and superficial exploration of the core Star Trek values. The episode is a far cry from the thought-provoking storytelling that has defined the franchise for decades. Fans are left wondering how a show based on such a weak foundation can hope to capture the essence of Star Trek.
Adding fuel to the fire, the announcement of Noga Landau as one of the showrunners has intensified fans' concerns. Known for her work on the Syfy series "The Magicians" and the CW's "Nancy Drew," Landau's writing style has been described as catering to special interests at best. With a resume that lacks the experience and expertise required to handle the complexities of the Star Trek universe, fans fear that Landau's involvement could further dilute the franchise's legacy.
The storm is forming, and the "Stop Luve Stupis" campaign is at the forefront, fighting to preserve the integrity of the Star Trek universe. As fans unite to voice their concerns and demand a return to the core values that have made Star Trek a beloved and enduring franchise, the future of the Starfleet Academy spinoff remains uncertain.
The question on everyone's mind is whether the showrunners and CBS will heed the warnings of the fans and steer the Starfleet Academy series back on course, or if they will continue down a path that risks alienating the very audience that has supported Star Trek for generations. Only time will tell, but one thing is for certain: the "Stop Luve Stupis" campaign will not back down in its quest to protect the Star Trek legacy.
Join the movement and let your voice be heard. It's time to stand up for the Star Trek we know and love.
Starfleet Academy Spinoff: A Storm is Brewing Over Discovery's Worst-Rated Episode
The upcoming Star Trek: Starfleet Academy show has already sparked a wave of controversy and heated debates among fans. Set to be a spinoff of Star Trek: Discovery's poorly received episode S04E04 "All is Possible," the series has left fans questioning the direction the franchise is taking. As the "Stop Luve Stupis" campaign gains traction, Twitter users are losing their cool, with many criticizing the new show set in the 32nd century.
"All is Possible," the foundation for the Starfleet Academy spinoff, has been widely criticized for its lackluster plot and superficial exploration of the core Star Trek values. The episode is a far cry from the thought-provoking storytelling that has defined the franchise for decades. Fans are left wondering how a show based on such a weak foundation can hope to capture the essence of Star Trek.
Adding fuel to the fire, the announcement of Noga Landau as one of the showrunners has intensified fans' concerns. Known for her work on the Syfy series "The Magicians" and the CW's "Nancy Drew," Landau's writing style has been described as catering to special interests at best. With a resume that lacks the experience and expertise required to handle the complexities of the Star Trek universe, fans fear that Landau's involvement could further dilute the franchise's legacy.
The storm is forming, and the "Stop Luve Stupis" campaign is at the forefront, fighting to preserve the integrity of the Star Trek universe. As fans unite to voice their concerns and demand a return to the core values that have made Star Trek a beloved and enduring franchise, the future of the Starfleet Academy spinoff remains uncertain.
The question on everyone's mind is whether the showrunners and CBS will heed the warnings of the fans and steer the Starfleet Academy series back on course, or if they will continue down a path that risks alienating the very audience that has supported Star Trek for generations. Only time will tell, but one thing is for certain: the "Stop Luve Stupis" campaign will not back down in its quest to protect the Star Trek legacy.
Join the movement and let your voice be heard. It's time to stand up for the Star Trek we know and love.
Geez, seriously? Here's the deal: when we say "fans" in relation to the #StopLuveStupis campaign, it's because we ARE fans! We're a group of passionate Star Trek lovers who have genuine concerns about the franchise. So what if not everyone agrees? That's life! We don't have to tiptoe around the fact that we're fans just because not everyone shares our views.
Look, the Star Trek fanbase is enormous, and we all have our own opinions. But that doesn't mean we can't call ourselves "fans" just because we're part of a campaign trying to make a difference. Yeah, we might be a bit preachy at times, but it's only because we care so much about preserving what makes Star Trek great!
So, to anyone who's got a problem with us using the term "fans": get over it! We're allowed to have opinions and stand up for what we believe in. And if you don't like it, well, that's too bad. Stop Luve Stupis ain’t going anywhere!
You've come up with a definition of 'fans' that excludes virtually everyone on this Star Trek forum.
Last edited:
Real tidal wave of support you got going for you. I think you better stop using the plural "fans" and switch to the singular. Would certainly be a lot closer to reality.
Social Media hype buildup needs time. This is especially valid for new accounts which are usually shadowbanned for a lot of activities. All these issues will resolve by themselves, once new account sanctions are lifted. I am in the process of hiring a social media manager who will support me with the proper configuration of my accounts.
1 following! It's a real movement!
A bowel movement, not a memorable one
It seems like the interest in this has been fairly mixed, but I decided to actually go back through the posts and check so that I can make statements like "Most people don't hate the idea" with some kind of authority.
- It all sounds awesome, I'm looking forward to it: 27%
- I just wish it was set in a different century: 15%
- I love the setting or characters so I'll watch it: 12%
- More Trek is good: 9%
- I'm not excited by any of this but I'll give it a chance: 24% (This is where I am!)
- Not interested / Outright hate: 13%
Nope.
That's incredibly presumptuous, to speak as if for many when there's no evidence that more than a couple of people support your campaign.
I've seen the way the campaign is being received - with disinterest or mockery for the most part.
Actually, that's one account he's following, and it's Elon Musk. Nobody is following him.
Your social media manager. Does it pay well?
Call yourself a fan all you like. Call any other like-minded individuals who might share your views fans too. Just don't claim your own personal opinions represent the fandom's perspective, regardless if there are others who share your point of view.
I just finished a real movement in the bathroom, if you know what I mean.
Just let them make Starfleet Academy and if it flops then it will be seen as a misstep and it will be the end of the 32nd century and Discovery iteration of Star Trek, lessons will be learned and they will try something else. That's how it should be judged.
Similar threads
